As we can see, even Chafer, probably the most highly regarded follower of Scofield's, did not agree with him in every place:
"The tight bond between the two men being established, a comparison between Scofield's view of sanctification in Plain Papers on the Holy Spirit, from 1899 and that in Chafer's He That is Spiritual in 1918 will uncover
a wide chasm between the two on the essential matter of praxis. For both men, the central issue in living the Christian way of life was the power of the Holy Spirit in the specific ministry of filling, as opposed to indwelling or baptizing. This Chafer saw as strictly distinct from American Keswick of Trumbull's persuasion because the enablement is all of the Spirit, instead of mystical union with Christ. Both Scofield and Chafer list and elaborate upon the criteria for the filling of the Holy Spirit. Chafer's threefold criteria are especially distinct from Scofield's five requirements.
Chafer had two negative requirements and one positive, based on clear injunctions in the Epistles. On the negative side, a believer must not quench (1 Thes 5:19) or grieve (Eph 4:30) the Holy Spirit. The positive requirement is dependence upon the Spirit, which Chafer understood to be the meaning of "walk by means of the Spirit" in Galatians 5:16. This is direct activity on the part of the believer regarding the Third Person of the Trinity. In contrast, Scofield was still very Keswick-sounding in his criteria to be filled with the Spirit. Chafer had obviously affirmed Scofield's two negative criteria, for they are common to both men. But the positive requirements Scofield put forth are "yielding," "faith," and "prayer." Scofield was specific about what these things meant. Yielding was, as with Chafer, a dedication of self to the will of God per Romans 6:13 and 12:1. Neither writer describes a "second blessing" or "crisis," but Scofield was explicit that we are to yield to Christ through the power of the Spirit, with our responsible portion of the transaction being assent. Both writers say that re-consecration (Scofield) and rededication (Chafer) are unnecessary. When Scofield said faith was necessary to the filling of the Spirit, he meant very specifically that we are to "trust in [Christ] as the alone bestower of the Spirit."
Then Scofield's correlations are with the Lord's promises to send the Spirit in John 7:37-39. One might imagine Chafer asking, "What about the indwelling of the Spirit we have already received upon faith in Christ for our salvation?" This idea of faith in Christ for the filling of the Spirit is certainly Keswick but not at all Chaferian. The third of Scofield's criteria was prayer. Chafer would say that all Christian prayer is to be directed to the Father in the name of the Son in the power of the Spirit. Scofield's criterion is prayer to the Son for the Filling of the Spirit. Chafer is helpfully clear on this doctrine: "Prayer for the Spirit’s filling is an error of great proportions and indicates a misunderstanding of the conditions which now obtain. The Spirit’s filling does not await the influence of prayer. God is not withholding this blessing until He is prevailed upon or some reluctance on His part is broken down. He awaits the requisite human adjustments. In other words, He is waiting for the believer to yield all to Him."
Source:
https://www.deanbibleministries.org/dbmfiles/notes/2011-ChaferConf-Roseland-paper.pdf