- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,099
- Reaction score
- 182
- Points
- 63
I missed that. I thought you meant that 25 year olds are entitled.I was referring more to the age. You said 25 years old. I’m pretty sure you know that already.
I missed that. I thought you meant that 25 year olds are entitled.I was referring more to the age. You said 25 years old. I’m pretty sure you know that already.
NoI’m not privy to national security reports, but since we’ve had both a Democratic and now Republican administration giving aid to Ukraine, maybe there’s something to it.
How does this benefit the American people?i don;t have time to retype everything i wrote about this before.... ...but many of the reports and official documents surrounding the agreements made between east and west at the end of the cold war were declassified a few years ago...... since then they have all disappeared from the internet - - i don;t know why but it;s not unusual in this new age of censorship and micromanaged freedoms..... .
but here is the gist........ and all the documents still posted on the thread i made about the war in ukraine are here in this quoted post....... when obama came to power he started tossing out careless statements to the effect that nato would be epanded to the east and eventually include ukraine....this was a clear violation of the agreement made in budapest when the soviet union disolved and east germany reunited with the west.... . putin had already made it clear eastward expansion of nato was not acceptable and that he would go to war to stop it............ obama kept running his mouth and the rest is history........
after putins attack on ukraine the fear became he would get the taste for blood and continue marching across europe into other countries as well....... both left and right in american politics agreed he had to be stopped.... the only question remaining was how to do it.....
oh ......i don;t know..... . stopping putin from making an unchecked march across europe? ....and eventually occupying all lands the nazis held during world war 2?.......How does this benefit the American people?
Just wondering what I am missing. For instance, the Hindenburg fire was a great tragedy. Nothing in the use of great in that sentence is making a positive statement yet it is a perfectly valid use of the word.
Putin isn’t going to take over Europe.oh ......i don;t know..... . stopping putin from making an unchecked march across europe? ....and eventually occupying all lands the nazis held during world war 2?..........nah .....preventing a thing like that couldn;t benefit americans at all could it?....
...
..... could you really be this dense?.... or are you just trolling and being intentionally obtuse again?........
You’re correct. It’s making people like Nikki Haley money.I’m not privy to national security reports, but since we’ve had both a Democratic and now Republican administration giving aid to Ukraine, maybe there’s something to it.
That video is about as solid and balanced as any I have seen. Good post for this thread.During a committee meeting on Bill C9, Minister Miller in Canada questioned whether the good faith defense in section 319 subsection 3 of the criminal code should still protect someone who publicly reads or cites Bible passages he considers hateful and suggested prosecutors might have discretion to charge people for quoting them. Does anyone really believe that if Kamala Harris and the radical Democrats had taken control of the government that things similar to this would not have happened in the United States? This Minister claims to be a Christian just like Kamala Harris who is a Baptist. If Christians refuse to be salt and light in the world and stand for nothing then there will be no place to publicly proclaim the gospel except underground.
when you make someone like putin feel threatened in his own country there is no way to predict what he might do.......Putin isn’t going to take over Europe.
A little slow on the uptake there...During a committee meeting on Bill C9, Minister Miller in Canada questioned whether the good faith defense in section 319 subsection 3 of the criminal code should still protect someone who publicly reads or cites Bible passages he considers hateful and suggested prosecutors might have discretion to charge people for quoting them. Does anyone really believe that if Kamala Harris and the radical Democrats had taken control of the government that things similar to this would not have happened in the United States? This Minister claims to be a Christian just like Kamala Harris who is a Baptist. If Christians refuse to be salt and light in the world and stand for nothing then there will be no place to publicly proclaim the gospel except underground.
Jews have been harassed and attacked across college campuses and it has only increased since the massacre on October 7, 2023. If this were happening to Blacks or any other group of people the news media would be going crazy. You openly support the Jew hatred espoused by Luther in his book and used by Hitler to fuel the Holocaust. Just a reminder the hate you have in your heart here is a list:Could quoting the Bible become a Crime?
A little slow on the uptake there...
We'll officially indict the Gospel for being anti-semitic
![]()
House Passes Anti-Semitism Bill Amid Campus Unrest
The bill will establish ‘that if you are engaged in rhetoric and behavior that is anti-Semitic, there’s going to be consequences,’ says GOP Rep. Mike Lawler.www.theepochtimes.com
The legislation passed the lower chamber in a broadly bipartisan 320–91 vote. That included 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats who opposed the legislation, many of whom expressed concerns about a potential chilling effect that the bill could have on free speech because of some ambiguities in the way it’s written.The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, which will now go to the Senate for consideration, would apply...
www.wnd.com
Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick FuentesAnother home run from Nick Freitas. (I hope this doesn't stir up more yammering about that other Nick.)
I do not.You openly support the Jew hatred
Luther did not hate the Jewsespoused by Luther
As it is used to further the fuel the mendacious rhetoric and propaganda of the Zionists.in his book and used by Hitler to fuel the Holocaust.
Or the AnabaptistsAnd luther, (and likely the others whose quotes were undoubtedly cherry-picked by your sources), was not 'denigrating' the Jews any more than he was denigrating the Pope or Rome,
For the last time...get this through your thick skull...it wasn't antisemitism.You also have to remember, that in Luther's day, the civil government enforced Christian dogma and orthodoxy. And to whom was Luther writing?
Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes, Nick Fuentes
You take the same positions as Tucker Carlson a known anti-Semite. Do you refute Carlson?I do not.
Luther did not hate the Jews
As it is used to further the fuel the mendacious rhetoric and propaganda of the Zionists.
But as was explained to you more than once...
Or the Anabaptists
Or the Zwingli prophets
And neither did he recommend a harsher treatment of the Jews, than he did any other group that he thought that held to erroneous, heretical, or antichrist doctrines.
For the last time...get this through your thick skull...it wasn't antisemitism.
Just in case you missed my edit.You take the same positions as Tucker Carlson a known anti-Semite. Do you refute Carlson?
Now just because I cued the video to the verbatim, that it isn't antisemitism, is no reason to deprive yourself of the understanding gained from the entire lecture.
Educate yourself instead of simply regurgitating the Christian Zionist vomitus you so greedily lap up yourself.
Do you refute the Talmud?Do you refute Carlson?