How do YOU know this? I bet some people on this very forum can refute your statement.The Baptist Churches though do NOT hide those pastors away, keep moving them around, and refuse to disclose on them for law purposes
How do YOU know this? I bet some people on this very forum can refute your statement.The Baptist Churches though do NOT hide those pastors away, keep moving them around, and refuse to disclose on them for law purposes
The Baptist Churches though do NOT hide those pastors away, keep moving them around, and refuse to disclose on them for law purposes
Who?*cough"davehyles*cough*bobgrayjax*cough*
They are no doubt those allowed to do grievous things, but not to the extent that entire groups had decided to just look the other way and allow sinning to just keep on happening, Rome has let this fester for a very ;long time, and much of the blame comes back to their non biblical stance that priests must be celibate and singleHow do YOU know this? I bet some people on this very forum can refute your statement.
Exactly. Relative unknowns. Exceptions that prove the rule.Who?
There are approximately 1.4 billion Catholics in the world. There are approximately 50 to 100 million Baptists in the world. Catholics are essentially monolithic, whereas Baptists are by nature the opposite. I’m not saying that Rome hasn’t been involved in coverups, but you’re really comparing apples and oranges here.They are no doubt those allowed to do grievous things, but not to the extent that entire groups had decided to just look the other way and allow sinning to just keep on happening, Rome has let this fester for a very ;long time, and much of the blame comes back to their non biblical stance that priests must be celibate and single
I get everything you said, and I believe nearly every person would feel the same way, but I think that it’s a shame if a single (never married) man is automatically unconsidered for ministry just because he chose to be celibate and dedicated his life to service for God. This is not a dealbreaker according to Scriptures. There are other dealbreakers, but celibacy isn’t one of them.Probably not someone I would consider for the role of a Senior Pastor though. And this would be for the reasons I mentioned above.
No. Just like being female wasn't a deal breaker for Deborah, but it's not the rule. In the absence of one's family dynamics, an express qualification for one desiring the office of bishop, what would be an equivalent substitute?There are other dealbreakers, but celibacy isn’t one of them.
I suppose that depends on the denominational rules. Nowadays, it seems anything goes for the majority of them. Not long ago, the Presbyterian church (USA) allowed gay ministers to lead churches with the promise that they remain celibate while in office. That rule came and went pretty quickly.No. Just like being female wasn't a deal breaker for Deborah, but it's not the rule. In the absence of one's family dynamics, an express qualification for one desiring the office of bishop, what would be an equivalent substitute?
Who?
You're not thinking biblically about this.I suppose that depends on the denominational rules. Nowadays, it seems anything goes for the majority of them. Not long ago, the Presbyterian church (USA) allowed gay ministers to lead churches with the promise that they remain celibate while in office. That rule came and went pretty quickly.
What would you consider the biblical meaning?You're not thinking biblically about this.
I don’t believe a man must be married and have children to be qualified as a pastor. Is that what you’re suggesting?You aren't thinking biblically about what qualifies as pastor.
Is a righteous family dynamic, i.e. a wife and children, optional?
So it's optional.I don’t believe a man must be married and have children to be qualified as a pastor. Is that what you’re suggesting?
OK, so how is my view not biblical if I suggested that a never-married man should be allowed to pastor just as a married man should be? Before you change the topic to wine, how about point out my error.So it's optional.
Is "not given to much wine" optional?
If a man is married, he must maintain a good marriage and have obedient children, which is an indicator of good leadership. But a man is not required to be married, as Paul wasn’t married either. My seems to mesh with Got Questions anyway: https://www.gotquestions.org/qualif...He must be a person,a good husband and father.I'm not changing the subject. We're talking about the qualifications for ministry.
You seem to be saying we can forego one because someone feels devout.
So, what is being measured or checked by the family dynamic?
Are you free to disregard it?
Is there another indicator?
So it's optional.
Is "not given to much wine" optional?
The right kind of leadership. Can you expound on that?If a man is married, he must maintain a good marriage and have obedient children, which is an indicator of good leadership.
Which takes us back to the first question I posed.But a man is not required to be married, as Paul wasn’t married either.
And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office... - 1 Timothy 3:10 KJVMy seems to mesh with Got Questions anyway: https://www.gotquestions.org/qualifications-of-a-pastor.html#:~:text=He must be a person,a good husband and father.