Widespread Damage at US Bases.

I’m not changing the subject. I’m only giving you our governments track record.

Iraq is a different subject from Iran. People more intelligent than you can tell when you're lying, so don't bother.
 
You realize this is a prophecy concerning the son of the bondwoman, right? Who does the bondwoman and her son represent? Galatians 4:21-31.

It has nothing to do with what's going on in the Middle East except where Jews are persecuting Christians.

Anyway...it's because of U.S. support for Israel™, the largest by far enabler of Zionism and Israeli aggression.
Because the Arabs are known to be a lot peace-loving Jihadist people throughout history, especially before 1947, right?
 
Sooooo, this gives the US the right to murder innocent people???
It was a statement (from Scripture) that many (even non-disoensatioalists) have observed about those folk. They seem to like to fight, a lot.
 
Iraq is a different subject from Iran. People more intelligent than you can tell when you're lying, so don't bother.
😂 I’m not lying. Is this not our track record. Can you admit that this is literally our track record?
 
It’s my understanding that before Iran is what it is today, that leadership was going to nationalize oil. America would not allow that. Therefore, our CIA helped in the regime change and we have what we have today.

The hostage situation took place due to the fact that the young people were retaliating against America for doing what we did.

I’ll throw this in here only to be criticized more. 😂

The Shah believed that the Jews had too much power in those days.
You didn’t read the link, did you?
 
It was a statement (from Scripture) that many (even non-disoensatioalists) have observed about those folk. They seem to like to fight, a lot.
So we’re wasting our time, money and lives.
 
So we’re wasting our time, money and lives.
Well, that’s what you believe. Many will not believe the gospel when we present it, so does that mean we quit doing that? Your fatalistic/deterministic logic/philosophy is unpersuasive.
 
Yes, if you are talking about the you put in our exchange? And I gave you my answer about imperialism.
Then you failed to comprehend how overly simplistic and reductionist your argument about 1979 (or 1953) being the singular cause for their prolonged hatred of the West.
 
Well, that’s what you believe. Many will not believe the gospel when we present it, so does that mean we quit doing that? Your fatalistic/deterministic logic/philosophy is unpersuasive.
The Bible says his word will not return void. The Bible says nothing about murdering innocent men, women and children that live in Iran.
 
Then you failed to comprehend how overly simplistic and reductionist your argument about 1979 (or 1953) being the singular cause for their prolonged hatred of the West.
Right. It’s pretty simplistic. If a country murders innocent men, women and children for no legitimate reason, that might cause hatred. 🤷 Well, oil, oil, for you is a great reason. But it’s not your innocent family members being murdered for power.

And we are commanded by God to continue to give the gospel till his return. The Bible says nothing about bombing Iran till his return.
 
😂 I’m not lying. Is this not our track record. Can you admit that this is literally our track record?

Yes, your literal track record, when you don't know something, is to treat your assumptions as facts. In other words, you make it up. In other other words, you lie.
 
Yes, your literal track record, when you don't know something, is to treat your assumptions as facts. In other words, you make it up. In other other words, you lie.
😂 what am I gonna do with you?
 
Because the Arabs are known to be a lot peace-loving Jihadist people throughout history, especially before 1947, right?
You are right. Even John Gill, a Reformed Baptist observed how even in his time their behavior had not changed ever since Moses penned Genesis 16:12.

“his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; signifying, that he would be of a quarrelsome temper and warlike disposition, continually engaged in fighting with his neighbours, and they with him in their own defence; and such the Arabs his posterity always have been, and still are, given to rapine and plunder, harassing their neighbours by continual excursions and robberies, and pillaging passengers of all nations, which they think they have a right to do; their father Ishmael being turned out into the plains and deserts, which were given him as his patrimony, and as they suppose a permission from God to take whatever he could get. And a late traveller into those parts observes (w), that they are not to be accused of plundering strangers only, or whomsoever they may find unarmed or defenceless; but for those many implacable and hereditary animosities which continually subsist among themselves, literally fulfilling to this day the prophecy of the angel to Hagar, Gen_16:12; the greatest as well as the smallest tribes are perpetually at variance with one another, frequently occasioned upon the most trivial account, as if they were from the very days of their first ancestor naturally prone to discord and contention.” John Gill (1697-1771)
 
Last edited:
You are right. Even John Gill, a Reformed Baptist observed how even in his time their behavior had not changed ever since Moses penned Genesis 16:12.

“his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; signifying, that he would be of a quarrelsome temper and warlike disposition, continually engaged in fighting with his neighbours, and they with him in their own defence; and such the Arabs his posterity always have been, and still are, given to rapine and plunder, harassing their neighbours by continual excursions and robberies, and pillaging passengers of all nations, which they think they have a right to do; their father Ishmael being turned out into the plains and deserts, which were given him as his patrimony, and as they suppose a permission from God to take whatever he could get. And a late traveller into those parts observes (w), that they are not to be accused of plundering strangers only, or whomsoever they may find unarmed or defenceless; but for those many implacable and hereditary animosities which continually subsist among themselves, literally fulfilling to this day the prophecy of the angel to Hagar, Gen_16:12; the greatest as well as the smallest tribes are perpetually at variance with one another, frequently occasioned upon the most trivial account, as if they were from the very days of their first ancestor naturally prone to discord and contention.” John Gill (1697-1771)
Yeah, but Gill was just a shill Zionist Jew lover dontchaknow? 😂
 
Yes, your literal track record, when you don't know something, is to treat your assumptions as facts. In other words, you make it up. In other other words, you lie.
Answer the question….is this not our track record?
 
Back
Top