Recent content by bibleprotector

I do not hold the 1762 to be relatively "significant". I refer merely to the information which identifies Thomas Paris as the editor of 1762 edition. I do not dispute the possibility that F. S. Parris worked editorially on the 1743.

There are no errors, obvious or otherwise. The problem is your set of assumptions and methodology by which you detect supposed errors. Instead of believing what the Scripture says about itself, you are following a view influenced by modern infidelity which sees errors. It is reason versus...

That's what rationalists call Bible believers, and falsely. Except that you are allowing a rationalistic or Enlightenment view as colouring or informing your views. That's not faith. Faith is reasonable. Your view is not faith. Since you are taking a view which takes in rationalistic or...

I do not know that it is at all, and it is not referred to as such. So you say, but then there are ignoramuses who claim that today's Cambridge Edition is the 1762. The problem with your position is that it calls the reasonable faith position "fideist", and makes your rationalist position...

He doesn't need to, he just says "spirit". Verbatim, he didn't, he said, "of my Spirit". You are, with your narrow definitions and imperfect meanings. Joel was speaking of the Holy Ghost, so you are wrong to accuse otherwise, after all, even you knew this was not the case, because you...

Your second option falsely implies that the Person of the Spirit is actually really limitedly meant in those places, and that the person who accepts the greater amount of accurate information as communicated by the KJB apparently is a Holy Ghost-underminer.

This is incorrect. A proper view of God, a truly full view, is based on understanding His exact written revelation known as the Holy Scriptures.

Here is the third way: 3) There is no issue, the King James Bible deliberately contains the word "spirit" with a lowercase "s", which in certain usages refers to the working and effects of the Holy Ghost.

The fact is that the electronic file that I have supplied matches exactly what is witnessed to in the printed Bibles means that I have done a proper job in copy editing. As for the separate issue of which Edition of the King James Bible is correct, it is the Pure Cambridge Edition. There is no...

The spirit of God is the operation, working, nature and condition of the Spirit as related to the hearts of men (e.g. spiritual knowledge). You are simply trying to read in "the person of the Holy Ghost" without understanding the exactness of meaning of words used. It is you who does not...

Joel specifically was referring to the working and nature called spirit, which is of the Holy Ghost. Those who approach Scripture with their own a priori ideas or Hebrew interdiction are potentially straying from the proper sense. This example is a classic one of where someone's zeal for one...

The KJBO view says you can be like a person in the Reformation and have the Bible in your own language, meaning you can forget manuscripts now.

Yes. Every space, every letter, every punctuation mark. No, providence means what is provided. Windows was provided, other systems who knows where they are. The PCE has so called minority editings too, like "Geba" in Ezra 2:26. No, I merged copies, and multiple times independently, but...

Plenty of false accusations there. Not only do I accept the Holy Ghost, but I didn't invent the Pure Cambridge Edition. It seems hypocritical of you to complain, who claims to zealously uphold the Holy Ghost. Would you wish that Jesus was led of the spirit into the wilderness instead of the...

You are incorrectly dividing the Word of God. At times, the word "Spirit" should be capitalised when referring to the Holy Ghost. At other times it is properly in lower case "spirit" because it has other meanings. One of the issues is that modern folks presume that a passage like 1 John 5:8 or...