Recent content by JesusFan

She is indeed kooky, as she holds to word of faith theology

Would see it as being a legit administered ordinance if was done in and by a duly authorized spiritual local assemble , and that was done by a legit NT Church.

The alleged affair is what should be addressed and get her removed if true

Both

Accepted as long as was done when adult

We would respect the immersion by the PC, as would see them as being a legit NT church , but if they had infant baptism, would not see that as a legit one

The thorny issue in that case would be reformed churches, as they do uphold trinity, Gospel, just differ on view of water baptism mode and when to use it

All of them teach and hold to heresy, so cannot be 'anointed of and by the Holy Ghost"

Think he is one of the lessor wannabes, as main heretics would be likes of a Hagin Copeland and Hinn

Those who are into modern day prophets and Apostles and "revelations" coming to them from God would take to heart"touch not the Lords anointed" as mandate to allow their leaders to do some gross sinning

Which highlights difference between reformed Baptist and other reformed, as we see the New Covenant only instituted and valid with those who are actually in the NC, based upon them having received Jesus as savior and lord thru faith in him , and thus qualified for water Baptism

We would notdoubt their salvation, but in order to be a member, would require adult baptism

Mine is wading thru A Puritan Theology: Doctrine for Life Dr Joel beeke

one of my pastors stated that whenever a pastor or teacher really makes an issue out of certain sinning in bible, that just might be the one area they are having hardest time dealing with themselves

You see this a lot in circles such as word of faith, as they have elevated their leadership to being modern day apostles and prophets, and pretty much what they do is excused under "touch not the Lords annoited"