Recent content by SC1

  1. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    You're pretty good at goading Ransom. And I have been known to be persuaded from time to time. But not over the King James. I'll come back at my own time when I'm not too busy and we will pick up where we left off. I'll promise that. I'll leave you with a thought however. The texts that you so...
  2. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    Just chat on. It's best to just leave a fool in his folly!
  3. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    My friend, if you are using books translated from the WH texts, your most certainly are dealing with Origens work. Neither here nor there. though. And I don't consider what they are asserting as lies. Thanks for your time. I'm done.
  4. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    It is a fact that 99% of the manuscripts used agreed. Or at least it was a fact. And we could go round and round all day on this particular road. I don't intend to So then, let me ask you a question... Where did Origen get his material from to create the Alexandrian text?
  5. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    The manuscripts supplied by Erasmus, who published and noted the Received Text and in no means created it, simply passed on the traditional and received text. Even Westcott and Hort admitted this. That text, known at the time of the translation as the Byzantine text (also known as the “Syrian”...
  6. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    To what end? There are only Received Text sources in the King James.
  7. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    Get behind me Satan... I've always wanted to use that statement!!!🤣
  8. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    Sorry... I was quoting tmjbog
  9. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    Saying that the scholars called on by the King weren't actually qualified. That's utter nonsense.
  10. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    And for the record, I'm not a "fundamentalist". I'm a historic Baptist, and I am very willing to defend the mindset of my fundy brethren. It's to be admired, not scorned.
  11. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    The criticism in it's self would then have to be in the Received texts, and not Origens twisted work, which are actually a re-translation of the Antioch texts. I don't know where you get your revisionist history from, but it's unbecoming to rewrite the past.
  12. SC1

    Modern, unsound, nonscriptural doctrine of KJV-onlyism

    The lot of you sound like those that believe scholarship should always come before spirituality. And you call yourselves fundamentalists? For real? There's a big difference in the texts from Antioch, and Origens corrupted texts from Alexandria. And to go even further, these new translations...
Top