Epic Fail
- Thread starter Ekklesian
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 7,793
- Reaction score
- 609
- Points
- 113
He looks like a doctor. Someone told him that it was him as a doctor. Yeah, that's what happened.
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,730
- Reaction score
- 2,334
- Points
- 113
Maybe he’s honoring Pride Month! 
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,730
- Reaction score
- 2,334
- Points
- 113
It is indeed a fake…but I still like my pride month take.
He is not the Savior.
Merely a distraction while the Commies regroup.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 7,793
- Reaction score
- 609
- Points
- 113
So why is he helping the commies by posting crap like that?
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,745
- Reaction score
- 270
- Points
- 83
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sent a letter to Congressman Marlin Stutzman thanking him for supporting what Netanyahu described as "my plan" to transform U.S.-Israel military relations from an aid-based relationship into a long-term strategic partnership.
In the letter, Netanyahu praised a proposed congressional resolution that would gradually reduce direct U.S. military assistance and replace it with expanded joint defense cooperation, co-development, co-production, and mutual investment in areas such as missile defense, artificial intelligence, unmanned systems, cybersecurity, and next-generation military plattorms.
While Netanyahu explicitly referred to the initiative as
"my plan," Israel supporters will still call Netanyahu's control over the United States a "conspiracy."
He clearly sees himself as a Messianic figure, puffed up by the hot air blown by the Zionist Triad, White, Huckabee and Cruz, and by the flattery of Israel™ who posted grand, oversized banners, declaring him to be the reincarnation of Cyrus.
Not to mention the host of Zionist rabbis saying as much:
That's why he posted the image. It's gone to his head. But now, with the new war, because that's what alliance with Israel™ means, and Israel™'s recent behavior sabotaging his peace efforts...the bubble may be ready to burst.
No...you're fooling youself thinking Trump had an ulterior motive in posting himself as a messiah. He really thinks it.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,504
- Reaction score
- 3,692
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
So you're saying that Israel's head of government wrote to the American government to negotiate a defence deal?
Nefarious! What does he think his job is, anyway?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,504
- Reaction score
- 3,692
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!
Well, what's the alternative? He really thought he was pictured as a doctor?If you say so.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,487
- Reaction score
- 651
- Points
- 113
For anyone wondering what Bibi was talking about, with regard to "his plan" for Israeli/American defense partnership, in his letter of June 1 to Rep. Stutzman, he was talking about Section 224 of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA):
"This section of the 2027 NDAA, for all intents and purposes, will make the U.S. and Israeli militaries ONE.
"This law would make Article 5 of NATO look like a Stratego game by comparison. Can you imagine Benjamin Netanyahu, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Yoel Smotrich having the authority to plan and command U.S. military actions? Yes, I realize that U.S. forces already act as a de facto mercenary army for Netanyahu, but this is subject to the accommodations of the U.S. president. The NDAA Act would REQUIRE joint U.S./Israel military cooperation by law of Congress."
"This section of the 2027 NDAA, for all intents and purposes, will make the U.S. and Israeli militaries ONE.
"This law would make Article 5 of NATO look like a Stratego game by comparison. Can you imagine Benjamin Netanyahu, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Yoel Smotrich having the authority to plan and command U.S. military actions? Yes, I realize that U.S. forces already act as a de facto mercenary army for Netanyahu, but this is subject to the accommodations of the U.S. president. The NDAA Act would REQUIRE joint U.S./Israel military cooperation by law of Congress."
NDAA Will Give Israel Co-Command Of U.S. Military Forces
Download free computerized mp3 audio file of this column (To subscribe to my columns at no cost, click here.) Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6,000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the C
chuckbaldwinlive.com
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,504
- Reaction score
- 3,692
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Section 224 of the NDAA in full:
This section would require the Secretary of Defense to designate an executive agent responsible for synchronizing cooperative efforts between the United States and Israel, including bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation. (H.R. 8800, s. 224)
In other words, it requires the DoD to appoint a liaison between the U.S. and Israel for defence technology sharing. I fail to see where it authorizes Netanyahu to become a de facto commander-in-chief of the U.S. military (or, for that matter, Donald Trump to command the IDF).
Is technology sharing of this sort a valid criticism of Israeli policy? Sure. But Baldwin appears to be trying to prove too much. (I'm sure Duh will look at me funny like I'm not seeing the very obvious, nonetheless.
)
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,730
- Reaction score
- 2,334
- Points
- 113
Trummmmmmmmmpppppppppppppp!
The text you cited is clearly, and on its face, much more comprehensive than mere technology sharing.Section 224 of the NDAA in full:
This section would require the Secretary of Defense to designate an executive agent responsible for synchronizing cooperative efforts between the United States and Israel, including bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation. (H.R. 8800, s. 224)
In other words, it requires the DoD to appoint a liaison between the U.S. and Israel for defence technology sharing. I fail to see where it authorizes Netanyahu to become a de facto commander-in-chief of the U.S. military (or, for that matter, Donald Trump to command the IDF).
Is technology sharing of this sort a valid criticism of Israeli policy? Sure. But Baldwin appears to be trying to prove too much. (I'm sure Duh will look at me funny like I'm not seeing the very obvious, nonetheless.