Search results

Do KJV-only advocates only have invalid questions based on their unproven KJV-only premises behind which they try to hide? You are not entitled to assume your unproven KJV-only premises by the use of fallacies such as begging the question and special pleading, and then demand that others...

UCG could be considered the broken record with his "loser" carnal smear tactics and bogus distortions [where he improperly puts words in the mouths of others that they do not state] since he is unable or unwilling to present any positive, clear, consistent, sound, true, scriptural case for...

You do not practice what you preach when it comes the KJV-only issue. You seem to engage in one-way discussion where you try to smear and bear false witness against believers who disagree with KJV-only reasoning. You do not display patience and do not seem to make any serious effort to...

You describe you yourself. It is clear that you do not think soundly and scripturally concerning human, non-scriptural KJV-only teaching.

Yet non-Calvinist KJV-only advocates such as you seem to attempt to deny any pressure of Calvinism on the majority of the Church of England makers of the KJV who were Calvinists. Why would you attempt to deny what you claim is undeniable? Under the heading "questionable concepts carried over...

KJV-only advocates demonstrate that they in effect reject commandments or instructions of God in order to keep their own non-scriptural KJV-only tradition. KJV-only advocates will follow the opinions of a man whether Peter Ruckman or some other KJV-only teacher instead of what the Scriptures state.

KJV-only advocates are the ones avoiding reality as they selectively misuse some information while refusing to apply the same exact measures/standards to the process for the making of the KJV and while avoiding a large amount of facts. KJV-only advocates seem to stick their heads in the...

A consistent application of Gail Riplinger’s very broad-sweeping, generalized accusation that all lexicons and all Hebrew and Greek study tools “are corrupt” would also seem to include or apply to the actual Hebrew and Greek lexicons used by the KJV translators (Hazardous Materials, pp. 29, 37...

Is it amazing that KJV-only advocates will attack or condemn in effect the same aim, mark, or goal as was stated by the KJV translators themselves in their 1611 preface? The word of God had been translated into English many years before 1611, and English-speaking believers read, loved, and...

KJV-only advocates vainly imagine that their unscriptural, illogical use of unjust divers measures/standards [an abomination to the LORD] is evidence. KJV-only posters keep displaying evidence of their own erroneous, human KJV-only reasoning.

UGC, your reusing the same bogus tactic of trying to put words in my mouth that I did not say failed.

Are you describing you yourself since you do not seem to realize that your use of the same non-edifying, carnal tactics over and over does not convince any doctrinally-sound believers of your false allegations? You have not demonstrated that you learn and grow spiritually as you refuse to...

Perhaps this is merely another example of KJV-only double standards. The fact that you may subjectively choose to believe a claim in agreement with your own biased, human KJV-only reasoning does not actually prove the claim to be accurate or true. KJV-only advocates often will not accept the...

One truth starring KJV-only advocates in the face is the fact that they using their human KJV-only reasoning attempt to apply different measures/standards to the word of God translated into present-day English than they are willing to apply to the word of God translated in English in 1611...

Perhaps you are mixed up and refer to UGC who often hurls attempted insults or smears in multiple threads. At least it is clear that you do not apply the same standard to UGC that you suggest in your own assertion.

You make broad-sweeping, unproven allegations and claims in several of your posts, and most readers likely do not take your unproven claims seriously. In contrast, my accurate observations about the posts of a couple KJV-only advocates can be proven to be true by any objective reading of your...

On her cassette entitled "Detailed Update," Gail Riplinger had claimed the following concerning the NKJV: "Every time they change from the King James to something different they follow the New World Translation of Jehovah Witnesses." Riplinger did not prove that the NKJV translators even...

Bogus, false allegations, carnal smear tactics, or immature, improper attempts to mock or ridicule appear to be almost all that some KJV-only advocates can post in supposed support for their non-scriptural KJV-only teaching. Perhaps they are unable to make any positive, sound case for what...

Do KJV-only advocates reveal that they consider the misleading claims, misrepresentations, double standards, falsehoods, and use of fallacies evident in Riplinger's erroneous human KJV-only reasoning to be superior to scriptural truths and verifiable facts?

Are you in effect claiming that Gail Riplinger, who is quoted in this thread, is one of the "dumbest scholars in existence"? Is that your "objective" assessment of the scholarship of Gail Riplinger, perhaps your favorite woman "Bible" teacher? Does a consistent, just application of your own...