Search results

The KJV is the word of God translated into English in the same way that the pre-1611 English Bibles such as the Geneva Bible are and in the same way that post-1611 English Bibles such as the NKJV are. The KJV is not the word of God directly given by inspiration of God to the prophets and...

Your posts do not demonstrate that you have actually submitted yourself soundly beneath the word of God when you try to defend the human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching that is in effect placed above what the word of God actually states and teaches. If KJV-only advocates feared God...

You have not demonstrated that your arrogant boast is true. Your claimed great doctrinal knowledge is not on display in your vain attempts to defend erroneous KJV-only reasoning/teaching. I am not a Calvinist. I am a Bible believer who reads the KJV and accepts it as what it actually is...

UGC, did you consider the title and subject of this thread before you went off-topic?

My first post in this thread directly related to the subject of this thread--replacement theology. My other posts have directly responded to what you have posted in this thread so evidently you were spamming off topic. You are guilty of what you accuse others. Your use of double standards is...

You need to look in a mirror. You are guilty of what you inconsistently and unjustly accuse others. Perhaps you merely project your own broad-sweeping generalizations on to others. You fail to prove that I project anything upon KJV-only advocates which I cannot document from their own words...

You make overly-broad, over-generalized accusations against all New Versions and their translators, which you do not prove to be true. Where are the actual documented specifics for your broad-sweeping smear? You have presented no specific, clear standards and measures for doctrinal...

You do not practice what you preach as you have not addressed nor answered my specific scripturally-based points nor the verifiable facts that I have presented. Are you in effect saying that no one should give your unsound attempts to defend KJV-only teaching any weight? In contrast to the...

You do not practice what you preach since you fail to weigh soundly your own faulty arguments. You also continue to make false accusations. It has already been soundly pointed out that disagreeing with and exposing erroneous human KJV-only reasoning is not attacking the KJV as you try to...

This thread concerned the history of replacement theology so perhaps you seek to avoid that it was taught in the chapter headings in many editions of the KJV beginning with the 1611 for well over 100 years. You try to tie replacement theology to Luther, but you avoid its ties to the Church of...

You do not demonstrate that you shift modern, human, non-scriptural KJV-only doctrine though the lens of a thorough comparative analysis against Scripture. You have made no positive, sound, true, scriptural case for your efforts to defend human KJV-only doctrine. In several of your posts...

Do you demonstrate how that many KJV-only advocates may be uninformed and sometimes misinformed about editions of the KJV? Perhaps ignoring or avoiding the first three hundred years of KJV editions, many KJV-only advocates may jump to their opinions about editions of the KJV based on post-1900...

Your incorrect allegation would demonstrate that you choose unwisely to disobey the Scriptures as you bear false witness and as you make an unrighteous judgment. Do you perhaps attempt to take the role of God as you seem to suggest that you are supposedly able to read my mind and know my...

Do some of the chapter headings in the 1611 edition of the KJV teach replacement theology? KJV-only author Douglas Stauffer asserted: “Contrary to the [KJV] translators’ biased headings, Isaiah is not primarily about or addressed to the Church” (One Book One Authority, p. 45). Stauffer added...

UGC, are you in effect promoting and admiring Roman Catholics with the video you found and posted as you waste time trying to attack and accuse falsely a Bible-believing, independent Baptist believer? Modern, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning uses some of the same warmed-over, incorrect...

You demonstrate that you do not know what you incorrectly allege against me. You may assume, speculate, suppose, and jump to wrong conclusions, but you do not demonstrate that you know the truth. I have carefully studied this issue. I have completely read over 150 books written by...

I don't. Your question is invalid since it assume as true allegations that you have not proven to be true. I make points based on clear scriptural truths such as the clear command in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 "Prove all things, hold fast that which is good."

It is true. I have clearly noted that I have read the KJV over 50 years. I do prefer the Geneva Bible, the KJV, and post-1611 English Bibles based on the same traditional texts on which the Geneva Bible and the KJV were based. All of the New Versions have not been proven to incorporate...

You have been poorly attempting to defend a modern, human KJV-only theory, which is not at all the same thing as defending the Bible. I have no been attacking the Bible as you falsely allege. By your bearing false witness against me in disobedience to the Bible, you are clearly not defending...

Your allegation is false. You disobey the Scriptures by bearing false witness in your false allegations against me. Exposing and answering erroneous KJV-only reasoning is not attacking the KJV. I defend the KJV as what it actually is. The KJV is the word of God translated into English...