If you're investigated and there is not enough evidence to bring charges your name is not released. So it's entirely possible that the prosecutors chose to not file charges. Doing so doesn't mean they weren't investigated. In fact it means they were and the investigation didn't reveal enough...
Apparently mocking God's image bearers is its own reward. I hope you enjoy it.
BTW this thread is a perfect example of what scripture means by worldly.
IF it is an event put on by a Muslim group that has rented the facility for that time period it should not bother anyone. IF it is put on by the city and the Muslim rules are enforced by the city then it is way out of bounds.
Every redacted name is a guilty party? You really don't understand the how or why of redactions do you? Witnesses and victims are two that immediately come to mind.
I don't want to know any names. That was pretty much my point
Bruh kept going on about the "network" and I was saying that those who were trafficked were not part of a network. If they were part of the network, they would not be victims but willing participants.
Wouldn't it seem logical that a network of sex traffickers would have to have persons who are being trafficked for sex? One could say that they are a group as well. Is it possible that they are the ones being protected? If they are/were victims of the network would they not possess the necessary...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.