Search results

But your school obviously had a lifetime subscription to "Making Assertions Without Evidence Is Fun." :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

And how is he involved in the investigation and/or trial?

Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!

Why? Because he agrees with your own opinions already? Lots of people seem well-informed, until they speak.

Who is Scott DePalme and why does his opinion matter?

Of course not. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Not nearly as proud as an arrogant KJV-onlyist who doesn't think his assertions require any sort of actual support from real logic or evidence. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Too bad this didn't help him manage his anger:

The above assertion, presented without a shred of support, brought to you by the geniuses who brought you KJV-onlyism. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

The fact that you fail to present any is not mine.

We're doin it for the dirty Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!

The de facto standard Benjamin Blayney edition of 1769 says in 2 Sam. 23:20 that Benaiah the son of Jehoiada "slew two lionlike men of Moab." However, an earlier printing, a London edition of 1638, said he "slew two lions like men." This is not just an accidental typo: there are two different...

Got mine right here, boobala. Any way I can help you relieve your ignorance?

Also coming soon: JimKnox whining that I didn't consider any of his arguments. I reviewed the thread. It took about 30 seconds. He hasn't made any. You get the septupling down for free: :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

You can always tell a card-carrying member of the KJV cult. It takes them about five seconds to question your "spiritual deficiency" for the mortal sin of questioning their evidence-free assertions rather than just taking their word for it. Credulity is Christ-likeness, right? Can't wait for...

The above assertion, again presented without supporting evidence, is the best "argument" KJV-onlyism has to offer. That's quintuple. For the KJV-onlyists reading this, quintuple means five (5). Five is this many: :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

The above insinuations, that I am mentally and spiritually deficient, are presented without evidence, courtesy of KJV-onlyism. That's quadruple. Hope that helps. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

The above was brought to you by the geniuses at KJV-only, Inc., where they don't have evidence in favour of their assertions, but at least they have whining. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

The above rebuttal, free of supporting evidence, brought to you by the intellectual bright lights of KJV-onlyism. :ROFLMAO:

The above evidence-free assertion brought to you by none other than KJV-onlyism. For all the phony blather about "final authority," it's clear that the KJVers consider themselves their own final authority, which is why this knox-knox joke expects us to just take his word for it always.