Search results

Anybody who knows the history of the forum, particularly the relationship of Ransom and I, sees this post for the uber rich irony in it and another example of how full beans you really are.

By the way, this ain’t true. I’ve witnessed it, for good and for ill. In addition to that, lowering the level of conversation to the level of the least common denominator rather than robust intellectual give and take is not only boring but also a poor reflection of Christian stewardship of...

It was a bit of snark. I used to be a KJVonly guy, so I was making fun of the parody box that ekklesian was trying to force me into with his characterization of me.

I didn’t buy any bitcoin nor special Bibles. Not a sucker, and not particularly jealous of other people’s wealth.

Wrong. I don’t read books, just the KJB for me. And your bromance is duly noted. <cue the Hitler gay videos>

“Sir, I do not recall.” 🫣

Jesus to Judas when asked who was to betray Him…

Ahem, “lose”. Carry on.

Hey, you asked to be blamed on the fighting fundamentalist forum. That’s like waving crack bags in the hood, bruh. 😁

The more you post brother, the more you demonstrate that you can’t string together a connected logical ability to reason and argue. You frequently connect dots that don’t have any connection. I don’t say this to try to embarrass you, but rather to try to help you to understand that your ability...

You do realize that with this kind of response you are actually demonstrating my very point about you turning every thread into the same one trick pony? The OP had nothing to do with Republicans not deserving our vote.

He’s trying to use satire to relate every thread that he responds to back to his obsession with Nick Fuentes, Republicans, and burning it down.

Oh you definitely see things clearly

Love them.

I have used many of the basics: Bringing other visitors. Memorization of scripture. General attendance. Etc But I give extra credit if they carry the KJB, don’t wear pants (if they’re a woman of course, no dresses on men, especially kilts), and if they’re display 100% Hyles paraphernalia.

Gothard‘s philosophy and theology on authority was trash, on that, I think we can all agree. Having said that, is there any basis in biblical truth to say that one Christian can be a stumbling block for another, and if so, can the issue of sexuality and modesty play any factor in this stumbling?

And Bill Buckner missed the ball, oops.😁

What do you mean? And for the record, that article was closer to being fair and balanced about the problem inherent to the bias of both political sides of the equation.

I’d put Al Mohler in the circle, even if it is at the perimeter. He’s not a lightweight, his Thinking In Public features erudite meaty discussions of various contemporary intellectual issues.