My sister in law was not allowed to teach Sunday school or sing in the choir because she wore pants to milk the cow and muck the barn. This was in the early 2000s.
Stupid? Yes. Cult? I don't know. 🤷
I'm sure that they are. Most people will gladly explain the meanings of their ink. The point is that a person's motivation for a tattoo today is no more obvious than the motivation to wear one's hair long was back in the day.
Absolutely. At one time men wore hats. Styles change. Things change.
The idea that everyone who wore this article of clothing or combed their hair one way or another was proof of anything about the individual is silly in itself. What it does show is that Christians aren't immune from "looking...
It was a firm statement because a musician said it was. Therefore everyone else with long hair or a beard or wire rimmed glasses or... well they agreed with said musician by wearing the style of the day, thereby confirming their guilt by association.
You are believing your own misreading of my position. And misquoting me. Not a problem. I'm used to it.
You did say that you were able to tell how a person thinks by how they wear their hair etc. Interesting gift you have there. I don't recall it on the list of spiritual gifts but it's...
Association with people with poor standards or being confused for someone with poor standards? That seems to be your argument.
FWIW the same era that you speak of was six decades ago. During that time facial hair was considered a problem. I was denied entry to a local bible school because I...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.