Search results

I asked you what? Dude, put the bong down.

Okay, then you must understand the irrelevance of the implication in your question to me about tagging a molester in public places like Walmart, right?

You probably need to define “Hollywood”, because there are plenty of production agencies like Pure Flix, Angel, Up Faith & Family, etc that make stuff that doesn’t fit what is probably your definition. Even more, within the art of cinema I would argue there are movies that don’t fit the...

Hawaii is possibly going to be severely impacted by Hurricane Lala. Praying for our FFF friend and those in its way.

Do you believe that your attitude and opinion on him now is because of the tainted ministry issues that follow him since his death? I only ask because I know men who were shaped by the course of his ministry who “ate the meat and spit out the bones” who still respect him.

If someone asks “what should I say” then I might agree with you otherwise our “help” is to plant and water by preaching the gospel.

Bringing issues of legality (the state) into how the church implements their morals and ethics is blurring lines (obfuscation). The state believes it’s ok to murder a baby in the womb. Should the church follow suit in its preaching about abortion?

Ok, for a serious answer. Yes, as Ransom pointed out, when these “scruples” or standards are used in an ecclesiastical setting to bind the conscience of individuals in areas of adiaphora it becomes legalistic. However, let’s take the example of Deuteronomy 22:5 and “pants on women”. I...

You continue to blur the lines between church and state. But to answer your obfuscation, if the law of the land were to mandate they must publicly identify by some sort of physical sign while in public I would not object.

Please elaborate as to your experience and rationale.

There’s a difference in prudence in safety/accountability and intentional perpetual efforts to shame .

Is this a Freebird thread? 😁

We are providing a balance of security, accountability, and restoration. That’s not even remotely close to the contemptuous attitude you’re advocating.

Do you wanna hear something really ironic? I just got back from running around all day in Cincinnati and turned on my local news broadcast. Literally at the same time I read your response about the Scarlet letter, I mean literally the same time, I heard a lady on the news talking about Flock...

I prefer mine be NIST traceable.

Apples to football bat comparison in my opinion. There is a significant difference in considering a person for ordination or leadership who has subscribed to doctrinal heresy or abused their high office for carnal gain and that of a situation where a person is being restored to basic fellowship...

A normal symptom of TDS. 😁

2 Thes 2:3 😉

If this vigilante scenario you seem to advocate for and align with were to actually play out, would that be the Christlike response?

So should the former (presumably repentant) molester have to wear some external identification so everyone is aware of their former crime? Should we keep them from Walmart and public places where children might be present?