Search results

It's pretty basic stupidity. You're telling me mistakes can't happen during school hours. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

How does the time the strike took place prove it intentionally targeted civilians? Once again, you fail basic reason. You moron.

You fool. No one disputes the school was bombed. You accused the US military of bombing civilians on purpose, without evidence.

You fool. No one disputes the school was bombed. You accused the US military of bombing civilians on purpose, without evidence.

Duh's evidence: "Is too!" :ROFLMAO:

You said someone deliberately told the military to go and murder schoolchildren. If that was true, someone is guilty of war crimes. If you can't produce evidence of it--and if you could, you would--then why should I believe you?

So you don't know. Quelle surprise. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

That's another evasion. Answer the question I asked. Who instructed military men to kill innocent civilians, and what, exactly, was that order?

Who instructed military men to kill innocent civilians, and what, exactly, was that order?

If your wife murdered your children and you divorced her a year later, what is the appropriate length of time to wait before remarrying? If we can say it seems too soon, that implies there's some kind of objective standard that people ought to wait, where it wouldn't be too soon.

Not strictly unconstitutional, I seem to recall. The 1st Amendment protects the press's freedom to report, not necessarily its access to information. Also, didn't Obama do the same at one point with Fox News? But it's not a good look banning mainstream news gatherers. Edit: Apparently what...

When have they never blown up one of our schools?

It amazes me how oblivious you are to the fact you're being made fun of for not bothering to read the thread before commenting. Either that, or you have a memory span of about 30 seconds. Your contribution to this thread has gone something like this: You: When did Iran ever attack us? Someone...

[reads the headline of the article in the OP] Lichtenstein. Duh!

Do you have sarcasm where you're from? Duh! :ROFLMAO:

You're proving you didn't read the OP, in addition to knowing nothing about history over the last 50 years. It's really not worth educating you if you won't do it yourself. Go listen to your Nazis and enjoy your obliviousness.

All you've done is prove you didn't read the thread. Stop advertising your ignorance.

Nick Fuentes's, to be precise.

OK HaMessiah.

I don't take normal lessons from Terror Towel Jesus, sorry.