Search results

LOL. It must be true, someone made a video on YouTube. Even if that someone is so ignorant, he thinks that the FBI has any say over how a university manages its private property after releasing control of the crime scene. Or even funnier, being ignorant enough to believe him. Remember, you...

"Someone like this." Again with the vagueposting. Who isn't able to make good decisions? The entire law enforcement community that released the crime scene? The administration of a university? Come on, Duh, stop playing coy. You're not at all sexy.

LOL. You're really bad at sarcasm. It's not a matter of believing Kash Patel or not. If the crime scene was released, it was the university's to do with as they pleased. Law enforcement can't hold private property indefinitely, and the owners are not obliged to keep it untouched indefinitely...

And the United States is defending itself against Iran defending itself. Is the US just supposed to let hostile nations drone-strike their airbases?

And this has what to do with the Charlie Kirk crime scene? Covering for one irrelevant assertion by making another doesn't work, at least not when you're surrounded by smarter people. :ROFLMAO:

OK, so then they called in the contractors. So what?

And?

If you meant "I don't know that the crime scene wasn't released back to the college; in fact, I actually know nothing at all about the situation, and I was just talking out of my rear" ... that actually would have saved you a lot of unnecessary writing.

Your mastery of the English language is rivalled only by your mastery of facts and logic. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

In other words, asked "how do you know this," you admit you don't know this. You simply make an assumption based on your other assumptions. You automatically distrust government figures based on your presuppositions. I neither trust nor distrust government automatically. And I'll bet you...

Proving what? Are you asserting that the crime scene investigators had not processed and released the site by that time? If so, how do you know this?

I've been trying to punish the Liberals for years. Unfortunately, I live in a safe Liberal riding.

... then I'd ask you to tell us who gives him stand-down orders, rather than just let the assertion pass uncritically. That's usually what happens to people who speculate on conspiracies, such as heads of government receiving "orders" from unspecified figures. Or people who try to connect...

But but but Iran is not attacking America.

No one's mentioned Iran in this thread prior to you, so your question is irrelevant.

Suspicion of what? (Let me guess ... you don't know. :ROFLMAO:) The crime scene was processed and released. At which point, the school was free to use it again as they wished. They were under no obligation to maintain it as a shrine.

Have you considered alternative activities? For example, exercise, personal hygiene, and girls?

Joooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos! I wonder how many times Ekk has to grope for that Jooish commission money before the word wraps?

Your opinions/assumptions are not anyone else's facts, though you do seem to enjoy deluding yourself into believing them to be real.

You have to realize, Ekklesian gets paid $7000 by Netanyahu personally every time he posts about Israel. He's living high off the hog on that sweet Joooo gold.