Search results

If his children are lying, then yes, they need to repent. If his children are being truthful, he is the one who needs to repent. Based on his history, I'm inclined to believe he's the one in the wrong in this situation.

The translation is given in the scripture. That is not the same as the entirety of the manuscripts being translated into other languages after the originals were written.

So why include the LXX at all in your argument? You try to support your conclusion that translations can be inerrant by making an appeal to Jesus reading from the LXX proving translations can be inerrant. If you don't believe the LXX is real or authentic, then don't make a case using it.

So LXX is an inerrant translation & 1769 AV1611 is also inerrant, but no other than the 1769 AV1611 is inerrant?

Now he wants his children to repent or die. https://protestia.com/2026/07/06/nifb-pastor-steven-anderson-asks-god-to-destroy-his-four-wicked-children-in-wild-sermon/

That's terrible! Think of all the data centers they could have kept cool with that water!

The rabid KJV-onlyists refuse to use KJV because "V" stands for version and they don't have just another version, they have the one true "B" Bible. * Alayman was being facetious. He is not a rabid KJVO.

Living Unoffended by Brant Hansen.

Only if a cat doesn't hop onto that table.

I wonder if he had any sockpuppets.

Happy Anniversary! Keep 'em coming.