Search results

Nor airplanes either.

More education is available.

Haha. Cute line. Trust me when I say I’ve been around this forum for over 25 years and lines like that aren’t going to earn you any respect or further the conversation in any purposeful, respectful, or meaningful way. Chill on that sort of stuff. Again, you did not address what I was talking...

I think you are a reasonable guy, and I am willing to take the time needed to hash this out if you want. But first, do you really believe that if I ran obtained nuclear weapons that they would not use them?

I take exception with the implication that the deals were similar. That aside, we aren’t talking about the deal to end the conflict. We were talking about whether there was justification to stop them from acquiring ability to put together a nuclear weapon that could be delivered to our allies...

My “snark” was because you used death (in war) as satire. Your laughing emoji at such was either insensitive and crass or nonsensical. It deserved “snark”.

I think some of that is reasonable, but there’s some of it that lacks nuance. Trump didn’t want war, but Iran needed dealt with on the nuke issue and was glossed over by MANY administrations before his. Trump may have underestimated how determined the Iranians would be after being thoroughly...

Welcome!

Just keep them away from the trash cans!

I’m a lifelong Reds fan so it pains me to say that about the Dodgers but it’s hard to argue with what they’ve built (and bought 😁) there under Roberts leadership the last half decade. By the way, there is a welcome forum here that you can introduce yourself and let people know what your...

Well, I guess that settles it. Thanks for the convincing argument.

Dodgers over Yankees in 6. Welcome Pierre. Were you on this forum years ago under this same name?

What does Matthew Henry’s opinion have to do with John Gill? And if you compare the historical proof that the trouble Arabs have caused to western society to Judaism, you’re absolutely goofy. But I’m all ears, make your case and show your work.

If it is just that simple, as you say, what was the meaning and purpose of inserting the 😆 after that simple statement?

I think you have a hard time following trains of thought and conversational context. But the first thing I would say is notice how you didn’t answer my question. Speaking of intellectual honesty, that is a common tactic of yours that has been observed by many people. I had simply asked you what...

Ok, let’s keep it simple. In the context of our conversation, what did “All I said was at least no one died this time” mean?

I really do try to understand how you think and string arguments together, but sometimes it is almost impossible to make your word salads make sense.

I told him the same here in the Trump thread.

You apparently play fast and loose with the word “murder”. Here’s some more opportunity to educate yourself.