Search results

Do you mean like what you do against believers who disagree with non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning?

Most of the time you do not address or discuss what I have actually stated. At times you have tried to misrepresent and distort what I soundly state, and you have made bogus false allegations that bear false witness. For one example, you have falsely alleged that I attack the Bible. Now...

UGC, you again throw out a completely bogus and false allegation that tries to suggest that disagreeing with and reproving incorrect, non-scriptural, human KJV-only reasoning is supposedly somehow "attacking the Bible." You expose your own erroneous reasoning by making such false allegations...

I have studied up on what Orthodoxy is within Baptist churches, including on what is orthodox, scriptural doctrine concerning inspiration, preservation, and translation of the Scriptures. You have carelessly and improperly thrown out bogus, false allegations against me, a believer who accepts...

Perhaps your statement may describe you yourself. You may be guilty of what you accuse others. According to some of your posts, you may hold some views that are considered non-orthodox or false teaching [at least you try to defend false KJV-only teaching], and you definitely keep defending...

Perhaps repeating a claim from Gail Riplinger, Doug Stauffer alleged that the NKJV has "51 omissions of God", but he does not compare these places in both the KJV and the NKJV to the Hebrew Masoretic text and Textus Receptus from which the KJV is translated (One Book Stands Alone, p. 150). In...

Are you suggesting that you in effect spam this thread with off-topic comments that do not relate to its subject? Are you in effect admitting that you try to avoid the actual subject of this thread?

Using double standards [unjust divers measures], some unsoundly try to claim that inaccurate renderings in present-day English Bible translations are "corruptions," but they do not likewise assert that inaccurate renderings in the KJV are "corruptions." By not showing themselves to be...

"acceptable" comparison of the changes that the KJV made to the widely-accepted 1560 Geneva Bible in the first fourteen chapters of Acts Acts 1:3 that he had suffered (1560 Geneva Bible) his passion (1611 KJV) Acts 1:20 charge (1560 Geneva Bible) bishopric (1611 KJV) Acts 1:22 be made...

Is the 1560 Geneva Bible no less perfect, pure, and true than the KJV as Gail Riplinger suggested? Is the 1560 Geneva Bible "practically identical" to the KJV in all its renderings? Gail Riplinger maintained that the earlier English Bibles such as Tyndale's and the Geneva are "practically...

Anyway, the 1560 Geneva Bible was already the widely accepted, read, loved, believed, tried and true English version before 1611 so critiquing the ladder [the KJV] against the one that came before it should be acceptable reasoning according to your own stated reasoning, UGC. The Scriptures had...

Perhaps you are trying to dodge the subject of this thread--unorthodox teachings of Peter Ruckman. Some seem to suggest that they do not always agree with Ruckman, but yet they repeatedly defend him and his views. Instead of sticking to the subject, some posters try to divert and avoid the...

You are wrong even if you close your eyes to seeing it. This thread is about erroneous KJV-only teaching.

The 1560 Geneva Bible was already the widely accepted, loved, believed, tried and true English version before 1611 so critiquing the ladder [the KJV] against the one that came before it should be acceptable reasoning according to your own stated reasoning. Nevertheless, KJV-only advocates will...

The accurate term KJV-only is not at all misleading. Perhaps you may try to smear and attack the accurate term in order to try to rationalize your attempts to defend KJV-only reasoning. The KJV is an English Bible translation so clearly and soundly the term KJV-only would apply only to...

I am a Bible-believing, fundamental, independent Baptist believer. I graduated from a fundamentalist, independent Baptist college in 1975 and from a fundamentalist, independent Baptist seminary in 1977. Would you agree that KJV-onlyism is also an extra fundamental that some have tried to add?

It would be more accurate to state that you will chant the same false allegations over and over like you think that you are some superior, super-spiritual superhero who can correct everyone else while refusing to correct your own false allegations and your own incorrect opinions. Your false...

Instead of apologizing for your bogus, false allegation, you continue literally to bear false witness and disobey commands of God. Perhaps you are too proud to admit and correct your false allegations. Are you trying to demonstrate that you are a false teacher? You choose to oppose the...

You disobey the Scriptures with your completely bogus, false allegation that bears false witness. Your loser smear tactics and your improper attempts to put words in the mouths of others that they do not say fail to prove anything. You show that you do not know the truth and instead state...

You do not practice what you preach since you will assert your own private interpretations and speculations. KJV-onlyism could be considered an example of how far some will twist or read their own subjective opinions into some verses and will avoid other scriptural truths to fit their personal...