Search results

Chuck Baldwin, apparently. And your reply to what I posted was still beside the point.

That's nice. Where does it authorize Netanyahu to command U.S. troops?

Section 224 of the NDAA in full: This section would require the Secretary of Defense to designate an executive agent responsible for synchronizing cooperative efforts between the United States and Israel, including bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation...

Apropos to this thread, a side note to JimKnox: This is what fatalism looks like, you illiterate. :ROFLMAO:

A great example of what's recently been called "toxic empathy." She could, reasonably, downplay her daughter's victimhood by saying it could have been worse, or something along those lines, without denying that she was, indeed, a victim. Instead, she virtue signals her moral superiority by...

Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!

So you're saying that Israel's head of government wrote to the American government to negotiate a defence deal? Nefarious! What does he think his job is, anyway? :ROFLMAO:

Homosexuals, abortionists, and feminists (per Jerry Falwell). Maybe Tinky Winky, too.

Sucks to be you, then.

Thank you again for the reminder that you are a fool who isn't worth my trouble.

What kind of illiterate thinks those are all the same thing? :ROFLMAO:

Asked and answered. And back you go into the irrelevant pile.

What is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

You forgot "Calvanists" [sic].

Now apparently they devolve into an argument about coffee brands. :) I used to live practically across the street from a Dunkin Donuts, which had a pretty big presence in Canada until they pulled out in the early 2000s. Apparently they're coming back. Feh. I didn't like their coffee, and if I...

If someone simultaneously declares many of a forum's members to be heretics, and gets hurt that "certain fellows of the baser sort chose discord instead," he is the very model of a double-minded man. You gotta laugh.

Prov. 26:4 I take it you have abandoned your argument in the original post, whatever it was supposed to be. Shall I lock the thread, since it serves no further purpose?

Prov. 26:4

Is not. By your own logic, you are refuted. Bye.

And you still haven't responded even though it would only take half the effort, all of which you've put into griping, instead. And since it's clear you have nothing of value to say, I'm going to stop paying attention to you now. Nighty-night.