Search results

KJV-only advocates have presented no positive, clear, consistent, sound, true, scriptural case for their human KJV-only reasoning/teaching. It has not been demonstrated that modern KJV-only teaching is sound Bible doctrine clearly taught in the Scriptures. It has been demonstrated that human...

Early, Joe, Jr. The Life and Writings of Thomas Helwys. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2009. This book is part of a projected series entitled Early English Baptist Texts. It has a brief biography of the life of Thomas Helwys (pp. 3-50), and it includes a reprint of his known writings...

Anyway, the 1560 Geneva Bible was already the widely accepted, read, loved, believed, tried and true English version before 1611 so critiquing the ladder [the KJV] against the one that came before it should be acceptable reasoning according to your own stated reasoning, UGC. The Scriptures had...

Seeming to imply that she could not possibly be wrong in any of her claims, Gail Riplinger wrote: "Even simple statements in New Age Bible Versions were not made without years of study behind them" (Blind Guides, p. 51). Riplinger asserted: “This book will provoke grave silence, as none can...

Lantz, Charles. Why I am Not a King James Only Advocate: An Apologetic for the Faith. Ovid, MI: Sophia's House Publications, 2019. On the back cover, the following is the first sentence: "This book provides answers to those who claim that the King James Version is the only legitimate word...

Baxter, Daniel J. Isn't the KJV Perfect? Lulu, 2012. 229 pages www.lulu.com The author of this book stated: "I was raised in an independent, fundamental, Bible believing, hell fire and brimstone preaching, bible thumping, King James Version only Baptist Church" (p. 11). On the back...

Peter Ruckman asserted that “this edition [referring to the 1769 Oxford edition by Blayney] has been regarded as the standard copy for 200 years” (Bible Believers’ Bulletin, July, 1981, p. 4). Ruckman wrote: “The standard edition was proofread further in 1806, and in 1813 it was published by...

Hyles, Jack. The Need for An Every-Word Bible. A Layman's Guide to Understanding the King James Bible Issue.    Hammond, IN:  Hyles Publications, 2003. 168 pages Second printing, August, 2015.      Price $15.00 This book is said to be transcribed from Hyles's Wednesday night series on "the...

The Bible: 1769 Revised Standard Oxford Edition, 1st Edition, 1st Printing. Copyright 2017 The Bible Museum. There is a reprint of the 1769 Oxford KJV edition available. It is a large size--15 inches in length, 10 inches in width, and 3 inches in thickness. It includes the 1611 preface The...

Does the name "the Holy Bible" always refer to only or solely the KJV? Does the KJV have sole and exclusive rights to this general name "the Holy Bible"? Was the name "the Holy Bible" used for any other English translation before 1611? The 1611 KJV was both a revision of earlier English...

One of the leading arguments for a KJV-only view in several books by KJV-only authors is a two-streams-of-Bibles argument. One stream is identified as the pure stream of Bibles by KJV-only authors and the other stream is claimed to be a corrupt stream of Bibles. One of the Bibles placed on the...

This link has a quiz about the meaning of some words in the KJV, and it may have information about a new book about how some words were used in the KJV. https://kjvquiz.com/

KJV defender Laurence Vance acknowledged that ?the engraved title page depicts the Trinity in the upper panel in the form of the Divine Name, a dove, and a lamb? (King James, His Bible, p. 55).  Gordon Campbell maintained that ?the godhead is represented by symbols rather than pictorial...

Could these three English Bibles be considered basically the same or are they very different?  KJV-only authors have described the Geneva Bible and the KJV as being "practically identical" or "basically the same" Bibles?  Do these three English Bibles belong to the same line or family of Bibles...

Concerning manuscript 1’ [min. 2814], Robert Waltz wrote: “Noteworthy primarily as the single Greek manuscript used by Erasmus to prepare the Apocalypse of his 1516 New Testament” (Encyclopedia of NT Textual Criticism, p. 1037). Isbon Beckwith wrote: “Cursive no. 1, of the 12th or...

The 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV may have some editing or printing inconsistencies concerning the case of pronouns.  In an article entitled “Ye and You in the King James Version,” John S. Kenyon claimed:  “In three cases [Gen. 9:7, Gen. 45:8, Job 12:3] nominative you in the text...

The 1560 Geneva Bible and the 1611 KJV along with other pre-1611 English Bibles are placed on the KJV-only view's "pure" stream of Bibles or good tree of Bibles. The fact of actual textual differences on the KJV-only view's "pure" stream would be a serious problem for their...

On page 13 of the thread entitled "Inspired Translations" The Scriptures had been translated into English many years before 1611.   According to a consistent application of Mitex's own arguments or claims, a consensus pre-1611 English Bible would have to have been given by inspiration of God...

On page 4 in another thread entitled "inspired translations",  Where is my own direct statement where I supposedly said that "bishop" is an "erroneous" rendering? Are you perhaps improperly twisting, distorting, and misrepresenting what I have actually stated or wrote since you did not...

In another thread, Genesis 23:6 prince of God (1534 Tyndale's, 1539 Great, 1560 Geneva, 1568 Bishops') mighty prince (1611 KJV) Exodus 23:17 Lord Jehovah (1534 Tyndale's, 1537 Matthew's, 1560 Geneva) Lord GOD (KJV) Leviticus 11:30 hedgehog (1534 Tyndale's, 1535 Coverdale's, 1537 Matthew's)...