Search results

Switched to Xenforo - new url. Sinaiticus - authentic antiquity or modern? https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?forums/sinaiticus-authentic-antiquity-or-modern.65/

Just a little correction. Burgon did not examine the ms., afaik he only had the book from Tischendorf.

Agreed, the proposed Christological interpretations are way overdone. There  is even good evidence that Eusebius considered the verse a bit too Sabellian, or oneness, in his epistle contra Marcellum.

Actually, I do not remember you ever discussing any citations.  Do you have an example? Thanks. You never gave any arguments to bother with. You would pull out one quote from AV Preface, and then go quiet.

What are you accusing of being a lie? Showing that Ken Penner is a respected scholar?  You are weird. Steven

The case presented by Ken Penner was extremely strong, and nobody has really tried to refute it afaik. "Assistant Professor, Religious Studies - St. Francis Xavier University ... PhD in Religious Studies at McMaster University with a major in Second Temple Judaism, and a minor in Early...

Check the thread.  I gave you the url to the main superb article by Ken Penner.  And at least the readers know that we have opposite positions, I say that Hebraisti in the NT means the Hebrew language, you say it refers to Aramaic. And I was simply giving good references and information, and...

Discovering the Language of Jesus: Hebrew Or Aramaic? (2005) Douglas Hamp https://books.google.com/books?id=12KTD95EhQcC Douglas Hamp uses a lot of the Ken Penner material.  He may also have a YouTube. Steven

Here is the one that I really like: Ancient names for Hebrew and Aramaic: A Case for Lexical Revision Ken Penner https://www.academia.edu/1669907/Ancient_names_for_Hebrew_and_Aramaic_A_Case_for_Lexical_Revision And  my wife and I were in Israel for a month, now that I am back home in...

Two different languages.  The Spanish-Portuguese analogy is ok, but I am pretty sure that Hebrew and Aramaic natives have more difficulty with the other language than the Span-Port situation.  In my experience they really cannot converse easily, and are likely to look for English as a common...

The reason the studies are informative is that the "textbook case" homoeotelueton is an amazing find. Maybe some day you will actually look at the pictures of the manuscripts and understand the evidence. Steven

  To a large extent there is no such thing as being bias-free in any matters involving faith and God.  Atheists have biases, textual critics have presuppositions, pure Bible believers tend to understand through the lens of the Bible. Hard evidence,  in this case the homoeoteleutons, speaks for...

An incredibly informative study: Codex Sinaiticus Authenticity Research Homeoteleuton - Text Omitted Because Of Similar Endings http://www.sinaiticus.net/homeoteleuton.html homoeoteleuton textbook case ? W. R. Meyer https://app.box.com/s/jnbxtg8et442xtsobklq8k830bwpyvnw homoeoteleuton?s...

Thanks for your thoughts. Now, any solid thinkers here who have seen  the video and want to share their response. Thanks! Steven

Sinaiticus Coincidences? - David W. Daniels - Feb, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_4WdDG-smU 17 minutes. Watch and enjoy. Your feedback welcome.

Actually we have had an excellent response to the two web sites. Codex Sinaiticus Authenticiy Research http://www.sinaiticus.net/ Sinaiticus - authentic antiquity or modern? http://www.purebibleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65 Which give the urls to other discussion points, such as the ...

Just to be clear, I wrote in support of Sinaiticus authenticity as late as 2013, until the studies of the new evidences, especially what became available through the Codex Sinaiticus Project. And I grant that if a person has not looked at the evidences, it is easy to call it just speculation, etc.

When eyewitness testimony gives testimony that could only be given by people involved in the situation,  that testimony is extremely relevant.  Even if the reputation of the person is checkered. Here is an example.  Tischendorf lied repeatedly about his Sinaiticus finding.  (Pathological liar...

We know the Sinaiticus text is corrupted, whatever the date.  And worthless for textual studies. That is not the issue that we are studying.  Authentic antiquity refers to the date of production.  Clearly it is a hack job and scribally and textually corrupt, whenever created.  However, if it...