Christian College Student Prevails in Court

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Huk-N-Duck
  • Start date Start date
It was a settlement. So technically, DeJong didn't prevail in court. The school blinked.

Either way, though, good for her.

Makes me wonder, incidentally: how would a situation like this go down if the political tables were turned? Suppose a student at an IFB toy college like HAC expressed a liberal view on some social issue in class.
 
It was a settlement. So technically, DeJong didn't prevail in court.
It’s a victory because the school knew it’d likely lose in court.
Suppose a student at an IFB toy college like HAC expressed a liberal view on some social issue in class.
Private colleges aren’t bound by the same restrictions as state schools. Apples and oranges.
 
It’s a victory because the school knew it’d likely lose in court.

Granted. As I said, either way, good for her.

Private colleges aren’t bound by the same restrictions as state schools. Apples and oranges.

That thought had crossed my mind for a fleeting moment.

Suppose the student made statements supporting a liberal cause while not on campus (e.g. home for a long weekend or something). Same thing? Put another way, given that the First Amendment restricts government agencies, not private institutions, is there any law that protects citizens from being censored by those institutions?
 
Suppose the student made statements supporting a liberal cause while not on campus (e.g. home for a long weekend or something). Same thing? Put another way, given that the First Amendment restricts government agencies, not private institutions, is there any law that protects citizens from being censored by those institutions?
Yes and no. Private schools can legally restrict behaviors in a very broad capacity, including off campus and off semester (e.g., a currently enrolled student who is on summer break) *if the student has the mutual expectation of returning as a student.* However, there are some areas of the law that even private schools cannot necessarily break, both state and federal, such as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Now, all that being said, there are still some loopholes that some schools can swim through, famously (or infamously) introduced by Bob Jones University v. The United States, which is a case every 1L student learns about in law school.
 
Bob Jones University v. The United States, which is a case every 1L student learns about in law school.

[looks up the executive summary on Wikipedia]

Hm. So the government believes it has a "fundamental, overriding interest" in eradicating racism, such as bans on interracial relationships. That would appear to me to fall perhaps under the rubric of the First Amendment (i.e. freedom of association).

So it seems to me the state ought to have a similar "fundamental, overriding interest" in protecting the First Amendment right of students to express contrary opinions in class.
 
[looks up the executive summary on Wikipedia]

Hm. So the government believes it has a "fundamental, overriding interest" in eradicating racism, such as bans on interracial relationships. That would appear to me to fall perhaps under the rubric of the First Amendment (i.e. freedom of association).

So it seems to me the state ought to have a similar "fundamental, overriding interest" in protecting the First Amendment right of students to express contrary opinions in class.
Here’s a seemingly different example that actually might help drive home the point. During the time of Covid restrictions, even after some local governments (counties) lifted mask mandates, some private businesses (such as clothing or grocery stores) still mandated a corporate policy of masks within the store. Unfortunately, some members of the public were unaware of private vs public policies and became aggressive in their right to not wear a mask due to the county’s lack of mask mandate. Some learned the hard way (jail) that they could stand on the sidewalk all day without a mask, but once they cross the threshold of that business’ door, they have to abide by the corporation’s rules.
 
Back
Top