... does not include the word "fish" in Luke 24:42
Just ONE.
Just ONE.
Hooper, show us a translation or a manuscript that...
- Thread starter FSSL
- Start date
FSSL said:
The "Gospel of the Holy Twelve"
http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_intro.htm
And who's to say that your original manuscript wasn't altered to fit a false narrative? You can't. All you have is speculation. Your "truth" is proved accurate by your peers. You doubt the power of the Holy Spirit and demand some non existent written proof of Gods laws. You lack the ability to see truth in what you read and instead ridicule those who claim His power.
You complain that I think all 66 books belong in the canon.
I have established that you don't have a clue about ANY book.
I have established that you don't have a clue about ANY book.
Hooper said:
Let's play your silly game...
Did you know that in "The Gospel of the Holy Twelve" it talks about people eating fish that Jesus served?!
http://reluctant-messenger.com/aquarian_gospel_123_129.htm
And Andrew said, We have no bread, but we have found a lad who has five barley loaves and two small fish; but this would not be food enough for one in ten. 13 But Jesus said, Command these people all to sit upon the grass in companies of twelve; and they all sat down in companies of twelve. 14 Then Jesus took the loaves and fish, and looking up to heaven he spoke the sacred Word. 15 And then he broke the bread and gave it to the twelve; he also gave the fish unto the twelve, and said, Go to and feed the multitudes. 16 And all the people ate and were refreshed.
FSSL said:
Lection 17:7
Anoint and heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils, freely ye have received, freely give. Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses. Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves; for the workman is worthy of his food; and eat that which is set before you, but of that which is gotten by taking of life, touch not, for it is not lawful to you.
8. He also said, I am come to end the sacrifices and feasts of blood, and if ye cease not offering and eating of flesh and blood, the wrath of God shall not cease from you, even as it came to your fathers in the wilderness, who lusted for flesh, and they eat to their content, and were filled with rottenness, and the plague consumed them.
1. IESUS was teaching his disciples in the outer court of the Temple and one of them said unto him: Master, it is said by the priests that without shedding of blood there is no remission. Can then the blood offering of the law take away sin?
2. And Iesus answered: No blood offering, of beast or bird, or man, can take away sin, for how can the conscience be purged from sin by the shedding of innocent blood? Nay, it will increase the condemnation.
3. The priests indeed receive such offering as a reconciliation of the worshippers for the trespasses against the law of Moses, but for sins against the Law of God there can be no remission, save by repentance and amendment.
4. Is it not written in the prophets, Put your blood sacrifices to your burnt offerings, and away with them, and cease ye from the eating of flesh, for I spake not to your fathers nor commanded them, when I brought them out of Egypt, concerning these things?
So, your answer is ?My Scripture contradicts itself.?
The ?gospel? I quoted has Jesus feeding fish!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The ?gospel? I quoted has Jesus feeding fish!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You recommended it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You willingly toss Scripture and make all sorts of wild accusations against it without proof...
... and you want us to believe the contradictory false gospels of the Twelve.
You reject IFBism and continue to use IFB styled argumentation
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
... and you want us to believe the contradictory false gospels of the Twelve.
You reject IFBism and continue to use IFB styled argumentation
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Intelligence is marked by the ability to use source material before making sweeping statements.
You provide zero source material. When you want us to look at your false scriptures, they still fail you.
Forum silence typically indicates that they are bored by your dead ends
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You provide zero source material. When you want us to look at your false scriptures, they still fail you.
Forum silence typically indicates that they are bored by your dead ends
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hooper said:
Shhh... people might peek above and realize that your own arguments failed you two posts earlier.
FSSL said:
You just love to make up this stuff as you go? Not sure why you even claim to follow Christ. What written proof could He have given you! Your just sad that the book you claim validates your false salvation has no more proof than the gospel of the holy twelve. You are not permitted to eat meat. And you are not saved by a prayer or faith or any other machination of your liking. You are saved by living the way Christ instructed. There is NO church age. It's all the same from Adam to the return of Christ.
Oh stop... I cannot stand reading stuff that doesn't pertain to the discussion.
Try again... show us ONE mss that eliminates "fish" and you can make your point in Luke 24:42.
And when you have successfully completed that, run upstairs and tell your momma that you stumped the FFF admin!
Try again... show us ONE mss that eliminates "fish" and you can make your point in Luke 24:42.
And when you have successfully completed that, run upstairs and tell your momma that you stumped the FFF admin!
Your unsupported opinion is the joke.
If there is mss tampering with the addition of "fish," we would certainly have at least a fragment showing that.
Whenever Luke 24 is found in a ... papyrus, majuscule, minuscule, or lectionary, from as early as the 3rd century, from the Byzantine, Alexandrian, Cesearan and all the other various regions, the text ALL consistently contains the word: "fish."
I even gave you a chance to prove otherwise from your silly Twelve gospels and I proved that Jesus fed people FISH!
If there is mss tampering with the addition of "fish," we would certainly have at least a fragment showing that.
Whenever Luke 24 is found in a ... papyrus, majuscule, minuscule, or lectionary, from as early as the 3rd century, from the Byzantine, Alexandrian, Cesearan and all the other various regions, the text ALL consistently contains the word: "fish."
I even gave you a chance to prove otherwise from your silly Twelve gospels and I proved that Jesus fed people FISH!
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 15,057
- Reaction score
- 1,069
- Points
- 113
FSSL said:
Proverbs 22:10 Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
Proverbs 24:9 The thought of foolishness is sin: and the scorner is an abomination to men.