There is a pastor in Iowa who raped his oldest daughter for 4 years. The mom doesn't want her daughter to testify because they have 8 kids to take care of. Now the man is looking for a new church to take him on. He should be in prison, right??
He should be in prison, right??
Where in Iowa? He HAD a church? So was this reported? Of course he belongs in prison. Here goes the same old same old behavior. Cover up. If this is true why the heck has it not been reported...assuming it hasn't since I've searched and searched to find nothing.There is a pastor in Iowa who raped his oldest daughter for 4 years. The mom doesn't want her daughter to testify because they have 8 kids to take care of. Now the man is looking for a new church to take him on. He should be in prison, right??
There is a pastor in Iowa who raped his oldest daughter for 4 years.
Yes, he should be in prison...with the lifers. They will welcome him with open arms.There is a pastor in Iowa who raped his oldest daughter for 4 years. The mom doesn't want her daughter to testify because they have 8 kids to take care of. Now the man is looking for a new church to take him on. He should be in prison, right??
Check again. You’re wrong. AND if it is true...so? What’s that mean? Someone needs to know how to deal with such an insane situation?Is it odd that most of the people responding on this thread just joined and their only posts are in this thread?
Check again. You’re wrong. AND if it is true...so? What’s that mean? Someone needs to know how to deal with such an insane situation?
The reply was to your statement that the new posters ONLY commented on this one issue. You are wrong. Point being SO what if this was the only thread that they posted on. Is there some unspoken requirement that you MUST post on more than one of the topics.I'm more concerned about the "so?" if it's not true.
In which case the OP is either telling tall tales, or trying to destroy someone's reputation.
As far as being so concerned the story is not true and someone may be wanting to taint someone's reputation...don't you think specifics would have been given instead of just Iowa?
I understand people being prudent. My point is there have been no names given or any other specifics aside from Iowa. So jumping to the point of being suspicious...suspicious of what? There are pastors in Iowa raping their daughters? That's pretty vague.Ransom is right to be suspicious of believing a post from a new poster, especially on such a subject. And why weren't specifics given?
I've asked for a link to the story and received zilch.
No one here is interested in false allegations or hearsay.
We're not being nasty, but just being prudent.
I understand people being prudent. My point is there have been no names given or any other specifics aside from Iowa. So jumping to the point of being suspicious...suspicious of what? There are pastors in Iowa raping their daughters? That's pretty vague.
Sounds right to me.What Ransom said.
If you have information and are really concerned, go to the police - not a semi-anonymous forum.
The reply was to your statement that the new posters ONLY commented on this one issue. You are wrong.
Point being SO what if this was the only thread that they posted on. Is there some unspoken requirement that you MUST post on more than one of the topics.