The Kraken Caves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Huk-N-Duck
  • Start date Start date
www.americanthinker.com

What happened to Sidney Powell?

Sidney Powell is a tall, dignified-looking attorney who became something of a cult figure among Trumpsters. Shortly after the election, Powell unleashed her “Kraken” in four legal cases aimed at overturning or at least modifyin...
www.americanthinker.com www.americanthinker.com

However, it seems that she has not recanted her views regarding election fraud. Her guilty plea concerns only a misguided effort to test an election machine in Coffee County. It is barely a crime at all, since there was no criminal intent. The so-called Powell conspirators made pictures of ballots after getting permission from Misty Hampton, the Coffee County elections administrator. No one was trying to destroy records, change votes, or damage equipment.​
​
...​
​
The MSM want to portray this as a serious crime involving the fraudulent election claims of Donald J. Trump. That sells copy in left-wing media. In a rewriting of history, a slew of media outlets now describe Sidney Powell as a Trump consigliere, who is now trying to distance herself from the crimes of Donald Trump.​
​
...​
​
However, the story is bogus.​
 
Ekklesian said:
Her guilty plea concerns only a misguided effort to test an election machine in Coffee County. It is barely a crime at all, since there was no criminal intent.
Click to expand...
No, it’s called a plea deal. 😉
 
www.theepochtimes.com

Sidney Powell Handed Win After Judges Dismiss Disciplinary Effort by Texas State Bar

An appeals court issued a ruling on the matter Wednesday.
www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com

Sidney Powell, a lawyer who filed lawsuits after the 2020 election, got a win in Texas after an appeals court ruled that the Texas bar did not prove that she engaged in misconduct or fraud.​
​
A panel of judges on the Fifth District of Texas Court of Appeals in Dallas ruled Wednesday that the state bar’s arguments lacked merit and evidence. They found that state bar prosecutors “employed a ’scattershot' approach to the case” that had alleged Ms. Powell did not have a reasonable basis to file lawsuits that challenged the 2020 election’s outcome in battleground states.​
​
“The Bar employed a ‘scattershot’ approach to the case, which left this court and the trial court ‘with the task of sorting through the argument to determine what issue ha[d] actually been raised,'” Justice Dennise Garcia wrote in the court’s ruling. “Having done so, the absence of competent summary judgment compels our conclusion that the Bar failed to meet its summary judgment burden.”​
​
A separate court had sided with Ms. Powell in the case last year, finding “numerous defects” in the evidence presented by the State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline. The court also found that the bar couldn’t provide evidence that she filed frivolous lawsuits.​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top