The review is tempting me to read the book myself.
Big surprise.
Mr. Edelstein rejects the commonly held view that the modern revolutionary tradition emerged from Christianity.
No way!
Christians, this argument holds, replaced the ancient pattern of cyclical time with a linear, progressive history, running from creation to Christ’s second coming.
Hence our BC/AD reckoning of world history...er, I mean BCE/CE
But to Mr. Edelstein, Enlightenment historical progressivism had “little in common with earlier religious cosmologies.” His insistence on this point can be a tad stubborn, and he ignores some monumental events such as the Reformation, which Voltaire himself understood as the seedbed of modernity. Certainly soul- and God-centered Christians could never understand the cities of men as the culmination of history.
Yet Mr. Edelstein does not fully consider the possibility of modern Revolutions as antireligious, rivaled rather than inspired by Christianity. They unleashed terrific violence on churches, priests and “old believers” of various stripes. They devised “catechisms” and “martyrs” of their own. If Christianity did not beget the revolutions of the modern age, perhaps secularization, or godlessness, did.
...
The American Revolution was of a different quality. It emerged from the British tradition of mixed constitutionalism and what Mr. Edelstein calls “radical conservatism.” “Rather than transforming their world,” he writes, Americans “wished above all to preserve the state.”
It seems fitting that you would seek insight on the American Revolution and populist movements from a secular historical revisionist.