The insidious dangers of Muslim immigration

[biscuit1953]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8sWK2fp3DM

http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/u-s-town-bans-residents-from-criticizing-mosque/

Many well meaning Christians justify bringing large numbers of Muslim refugees into this country with the idea of "evangelizing" them.  They have taken the Great Commission and completely reversed it to instead of "go" into all the world to "bring" all the world to this country so they can be evangelized.  Because some may convert to Christianity which is great what is really taking place is the spread of Sharia Law one place at a time.  It has already happened in Europe on a mass scale in countries like Sweden, Germany and others but is now catching on in various parts of the United States. 

There is no place for immigration of any group of people who wish to overthrow the constitution with laws made outside of congress and that is exactly what is happening.  We will continue to lose the freedoms we have enjoyed for generations by encouraging more Muslims to come here as refugees because some Christians are too lazy to go to where they are for evangelization. 

 

[fishinnut]

Received the following yesterday in an email.

Court: Residents Can?t Mention ?Islam? or ?Muslim? At Public Hearing on Mosque Construction; Thomas More Law Center Files Federal Lawsuit
ANN ARBOR, MI ? In a settlement agreement, which reads more like an instrument of surrender, Bernards Township (?Township?), New Jersey officials agreed that, in addition to a $3.5 million payment to Islamic Society of Basking Ridge (?ISBR?), residents and citizens of the Township are prohibited from commenting on ?Islam? or ?Muslims? at the upcoming public hearing to approve the settlement.  Astonishingly, a federal judge approved the prohibition as a fully enforceable Order of the Court.

As a result of this suppression of speech, the Thomas More Law Center (?TMLC?), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, yesterday, filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Federal District Court on behalf of Christopher and Loretta Quick.  The lawsuit was filed by TMLC affiliated New Jersey attorney, Michael Hrycak. Mr. Hrycak was assisted by TMLC staff attorney, Tyler Brooks. The TMLC is representing the Quicks without charge.

TMLC?s lawsuit alleges that Bernards Township?s settlement agreement constitutes a prior restraint on speech based on content, as well as, a violation of the Establishment Clause because it prefers Islam over other religions.  The lawsuit asks the court to: declare that the settlement agreement is unconstitutional; and to enter a preliminary and permanent injunction against its enforcement.

The Quicks reside within 200 feet of the proposed mosque construction in a zoned residential area.  Yet, the settlement agreement prohibits them from describing the many unique features of Islamic worship which will impact design of the building, traffic density, water and sewage, traffic control problems, road construction, and parking arrangements.  According to the settlement agreement, ISBR is permitted to make statements concerning Christians and Jews and their places of worship, but in contrast, the Agreement prohibits commentary relating to Islam or Muslims. In fact, ISBR has previously discussed the Christian and Jewish religions and their places of worship. 


Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented: ?As we have previously documented, ISBR has taken the extraordinary step of concealing significant links on their website to a radical group named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in America history, the Islamic Society of North America (?ISNA?).  ISNA is claimed by the Muslim Brotherhood as one of ?our organizations.? According to internal documents seized by the FBI, the Muslim Brotherhood?s strategy is to engage in a ?grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within . . .?

Thompson continued, ?While claiming that the Township had a religious animus against Muslims, ISBR hid from the public view its animus toward Christians and Jews, by not only hiding anti-Christian and anti-Semitic verses published on its website, but also hiding its significant ties to ISNA. Instead of standing up to defend its citizens against ISBR?s hate-filled anti-Semitic and anti-Christian bias, the Township colluded with ISBR?s ?Civilization Jihad? by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR, allowing the construction of the new mosque and Islamic center in violation of zoning codes, and now even suppressing speech concerning Islam or Muslims at a public meeting.?

In March 2016, ISBR filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Federal District Court alleging that Bernards Township had discriminated against the Islamic Society when it declined to approve the construction of a large mosque on a lot that was far too small to handle the contemplated structure.  And in November 2016, the United States represented by the U. S. Justice Department filed a second lawsuit against the Township on similar grounds. The settlement agreement covers both lawsuits.

Read the entire Settlement Agreement and Court Order....https://www.thomasmore.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Quick-Complaint_File-Stamped.pdf

 

[LongGone]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church. 

 

[fishinnut]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church.

Strange viewpoint you have there, but not so surprising for a liberal.

It is not about religious freedom........it is all about their modus operandi. It's their plan for world dominance and their plan to institute their own religion in every culture around the world and shut down all other religions.

 

[Ransom]

It is not about religious freedom........it is all about their modus operandi. It's their plan for world dominance and their plan to institute their own religion in every culture around the world and shut down all other religions.

@#$% Freemasons.

 

[fishinnut]

It is not about religious freedom........it is all about their modus operandi. It's their plan for world dominance and their plan to institute their own religion in every culture around the world and shut down all other religions.

@#$% Freemasons.

NOT me & have no idea what they think nor would I trust it.

 

[biscuit1953]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church.

Even when the fruits of Islam are manifested in stark reality such as in Europe and what has taken place in Dearborn and other places where Muslims have become a significant population liberals will always defend it somehow or other.  Why is that?  Ben Shapiro explains very simply why the left loves Islam.  It is a political movement that aligns with those who hate Western Civilization.  End of story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbnXjvZ05SM

Another example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MQccS2Lswk

 

[LongGone]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church.

Even when the fruits of Islam are manifested in stark reality such as in Europe and what has taken place in Dearborn and other places where Muslims have become a significant population liberals will always defend it somehow or other.  Why is that?  Ben Shapiro explains very simply why the left loves Islam.  It is a political movement that aligns with those who hate Western Civilization.  End of story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbnXjvZ05SM

Another example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MQccS2Lswk

I know Ben Shapiro is an intellectually smart guy but anyone with ties to Breitbart is not going to influence me. He believes Sesame Street is left wing propaganda. There is also the "Friends of Hamas" story regarding Chuck Hagel. Turns out there was no source and "Friends of Hamas" did not exist.

Fear of people that are different than us has a long history.  Though the Civil War ended slavery laws were created that kept black people separate because white people were afraid of intermingling with black people. We know those laws were foolish and wrong now but sadly there were churches that were part of the last to integrate.

Asians were feared in the 19th century. They were despised because they took the jobs of whites for cheaper pay and the demise of Western Civilization was predicted due to Chinese immigration. In 1907 the US entered into the Gentlemen's agreement with Japan to stop issuing passports to stop Japanese from coming to the US. Then during World War II we interned Japanese Americans out of fear.

At different times people feared Catholics, Germans, Irish, Italians, Polish, Jews and Russians.

Some Protestants feared JFK as President because he was Catholic.

The KKK continues to exist built on the fear of people who are different.

How do people of different faiths view Evangelicals when they talk about winning the world for Christ?

Muslims come to the United States. They appear very different and they don't always understand us and we don't always understand them. The generations growing up here will become Americanized. It happens with every immigrant population.

 

[biscuit1953]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church.

Even when the fruits of Islam are manifested in stark reality such as in Europe and what has taken place in Dearborn and other places where Muslims have become a significant population liberals will always defend it somehow or other.  Why is that?  Ben Shapiro explains very simply why the left loves Islam.  It is a political movement that aligns with those who hate Western Civilization.  End of story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbnXjvZ05SM

Another example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MQccS2Lswk

I know Ben Shapiro is an intellectually smart guy but anyone with ties to Breitbart is not going to influence me. He believes Sesame Street is left wing propaganda. There is also the "Friends of Hamas" story regarding Chuck Hagel. Turns out there was no source and "Friends of Hamas" did not exist.

Fear of people that are different than us has a long history.  Though the Civil War ended slavery laws were created that kept black people separate because white people were afraid of intermingling with black people. We know those laws were foolish and wrong now but sadly there were churches that were part of the last to integrate.

Asians were feared in the 19th century. They were despised because they took the jobs of whites for cheaper pay and the demise of Western Civilization was predicted due to Chinese immigration. In 1907 the US entered into the Gentlemen's agreement with Japan to stop issuing passports to stop Japanese from coming to the US. Then during World War II we interned Japanese Americans out of fear.

At different times people feared Catholics, Germans, Irish, Italians, Polish, Jews and Russians.

Some Protestants feared JFK as President because he was Catholic.

The KKK continues to exist built on the fear of people who are different.

How do people of different faiths view Evangelicals when they talk about winning the world for Christ?

Muslims come to the United States. They appear very different and they don't always understand us and we don't always understand them. The generations growing up here will become Americanized. It happens with every immigrant population.

Quit your lying about them being just another religious group and comparing them to immigrants of the past that actually wanted to become Americans!  Islam is much more than a "religion" for they are a political group with clear plans to destroy what is left of Western Civilization. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxNPvns7nU

 

[HeDied4U]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church.

Even when the fruits of Islam are manifested in stark reality such as in Europe and what has taken place in Dearborn and other places where Muslims have become a significant population liberals will always defend it somehow or other.  Why is that?  Ben Shapiro explains very simply why the left loves Islam.  It is a political movement that aligns with those who hate Western Civilization.  End of story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbnXjvZ05SM

Another example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MQccS2Lswk

I know Ben Shapiro is an intellectually smart guy but anyone with ties to Breitbart is not going to influence me. He believes Sesame Street is left wing propaganda. There is also the "Friends of Hamas" story regarding Chuck Hagel. Turns out there was no source and "Friends of Hamas" did not exist.

Fear of people that are different than us has a long history.  Though the Civil War ended slavery laws were created that kept black people separate because white people were afraid of intermingling with black people. We know those laws were foolish and wrong now but sadly there were churches that were part of the last to integrate.

Asians were feared in the 19th century. They were despised because they took the jobs of whites for cheaper pay and the demise of Western Civilization was predicted due to Chinese immigration. In 1907 the US entered into the Gentlemen's agreement with Japan to stop issuing passports to stop Japanese from coming to the US. Then during World War II we interned Japanese Americans out of fear.

At different times people feared Catholics, Germans, Irish, Italians, Polish, Jews and Russians.

Some Protestants feared JFK as President because he was Catholic.

The KKK continues to exist built on the fear of people who are different.

How do people of different faiths view Evangelicals when they talk about winning the world for Christ?

Muslims come to the United States. They appear very different and they don't always understand us and we don't always understand them. The generations growing up here will become Americanized. It happens with every immigrant population.

Yeah, and I bet all the liberals over in those European countries that have been invaded overrun with taken in immigrant "refugees" thought the exact same way as you. "Oh yes, they'll assimilate. They'll integrate." And how's that working out?

 

[LongGone]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/bernards-township-mosque-case-settled/528492/

Gives a more balanced approach to the issue in my opinion. The only restriction on "criticizing Islam or Muslims" was that the faith or members themselves would not be discussed at zoning hearing. I always find it hard to understand when Evangelicals don't fall on the side of religious freedom. This whole discussion could have been about a mega-Evangelical church.

Even when the fruits of Islam are manifested in stark reality such as in Europe and what has taken place in Dearborn and other places where Muslims have become a significant population liberals will always defend it somehow or other.  Why is that?  Ben Shapiro explains very simply why the left loves Islam.  It is a political movement that aligns with those who hate Western Civilization.  End of story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbnXjvZ05SM

Another example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MQccS2Lswk

I know Ben Shapiro is an intellectually smart guy but anyone with ties to Breitbart is not going to influence me. He believes Sesame Street is left wing propaganda. There is also the "Friends of Hamas" story regarding Chuck Hagel. Turns out there was no source and "Friends of Hamas" did not exist.

Fear of people that are different than us has a long history.  Though the Civil War ended slavery laws were created that kept black people separate because white people were afraid of intermingling with black people. We know those laws were foolish and wrong now but sadly there were churches that were part of the last to integrate.

Asians were feared in the 19th century. They were despised because they took the jobs of whites for cheaper pay and the demise of Western Civilization was predicted due to Chinese immigration. In 1907 the US entered into the Gentlemen's agreement with Japan to stop issuing passports to stop Japanese from coming to the US. Then during World War II we interned Japanese Americans out of fear.

At different times people feared Catholics, Germans, Irish, Italians, Polish, Jews and Russians.

Some Protestants feared JFK as President because he was Catholic.

The KKK continues to exist built on the fear of people who are different.

How do people of different faiths view Evangelicals when they talk about winning the world for Christ?

Muslims come to the United States. They appear very different and they don't always understand us and we don't always understand them. The generations growing up here will become Americanized. It happens with every immigrant population.

Yeah, and I bet all the liberals over in those European countries that have been invaded overrun with taken in immigrant "refugees" thought the exact same way as you. "Oh yes, they'll assimilate. They'll integrate." And how's that working out?

You can take whatever stories you want and then claim they were invaded. The first generation always has the most difficult time assimilating. Change is difficult but that doesn't mean it isn't right. 20 years from now there will be a new group that people are afraid of having come to the United States.

I worked with a fair number of immigrants from Muslim countries and none of them were the radicals people are talking about. I know the acquaintances of anyone is a small proportion of the total.  I think it is a Christian responsibility to welcome the stranger when that stranger hasn't done anything to cause me to think ill of them.

 

[biscuit1953]

David Horowitz was a communist raised by communist parents who later rejected that ideology and has a good understanding of how that system works to undermine American democracy and freedom.  On his webside he warns of how Islam and other groups are being used to destroy the freedoms we as a country have fought and died for.  LongGone is a mouthpiece and apologist for every left wing cause the Democrats stand for even though he says he is a "moderate."  The idea of bringing in thousands of Muslims into this country and justifying it by claiming to know a few Muslims personally who aren't radicals is nuts.  Here is a portion of an article by Daniel Greenfield on "HOW ISLAM IN AMERICA BECAME A PRIVILEGED RELIGION."

?Islam is a theocracy. When it leaves the territories conquered by Islam, it seeks to replicate that theocracy through violence and by adapting the legal codes of the host society to suit its purposes.?

?Religions in America traded theocracy for religious freedom. They gave up being able to impose their practices on others in exchange for being able to freely practice their own religions. Islam rejects religious freedom. It exploits it to remove the freedom of belief and practice of others. When it cannot do so through religious protection laws, it does so through claims of bigotry.?
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/257819/how-islam-america-became-privileged-religion-daniel-greenfield

 

[HeDied4U]

And their liberal lapdogs.

 

[LongGone]

David Horowitz was a communist raised by communist parents who later rejected that ideology and has a good understanding of how that system works to undermine American democracy and freedom.  On his webside he warns of how Islam and other groups are being used to destroy the freedoms we as a country have fought and died for.  LongGone is a mouthpiece and apologist for every left wing cause the Democrats stand for even though he says he is a "moderate."  The idea of bringing in thousands of Muslims into this country and justifying it by claiming to know a few Muslims personally who aren't radicals is nuts.  Here is a portion of an article by Daniel Greenfield on "HOW ISLAM IN AMERICA BECAME A PRIVILEGED RELIGION."

?Islam is a theocracy. When it leaves the territories conquered by Islam, it seeks to replicate that theocracy through violence and by adapting the legal codes of the host society to suit its purposes.?

?Religions in America traded theocracy for religious freedom. They gave up being able to impose their practices on others in exchange for being able to freely practice their own religions. Islam rejects religious freedom. It exploits it to remove the freedom of belief and practice of others. When it cannot do so through religious protection laws, it does so through claims of bigotry.?
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/257819/how-islam-america-became-privileged-religion-daniel-greenfield

Interesting enough I have had Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses and Evangelicals at my door trying to win me to their faith. Never had a Muslim try to convert me. Worked with quite a few Muslims and they never tried to convert me either. It is about 1% of the population. I grew up IFB and remember the preaching on how the Communists were going to take over by 1976. We would never see the Bi-Centennial. Just like this is was a case of misplaced fear.

You claim that I am a mouthpiece for the left. On the forum you sound like a right wing bigot that fears everything different from him. It is not hard to believe that if you lived in another era that you would be afraid of freeing slaves, Chinese immigrants, Japanese-Americans during WW II, the end of segregation and a Catholic POTUS.

Horowitz has his own bias also. His parents actually left the Communist Party USA when he was 17. He has made false accusations against the University of Northern Colorado. He claimed a student received a failing grade fore refusing to write an essay arguing that Bush was a war criminal. It turned out that there was not an essay and the said student received a passing but poor grade for not doing well on the test. The professor (Robert Dunkley) he claimed was so liberal was a Republican.

He also claimed a biology teacher at Penn State showed a movie just before the 2004 election to influence the election. He had to retract that claim.

There is a fifty page report from Free Exchange showing Horowitz's books contain factual errors,unsubstantiated assertions and quotations which appear to be either misquoted or taken out of context.

I can see where you and Horowitz would be on the same page of fear when it came to Muslims. Horowitz accused the Muslim Students Association  of supporting a second Holocaust of the Jews. In reality the Muslim Students Association had been involved in interfaith activities with Jewish student groups and in charity work or national disaster relief.

Biscuit just keep the fear mongering going. It so Christ like :

 

[LongGone]

And their liberal lapdogs.

I have no idea who the guy in the picture actually is but I am sure if there was a Muslim conspiracy to take over the United States they would be giving away the plan on a piece on card board with a sharpie ???

 

[biscuit1953]

David Horowitz was a communist raised by communist parents who later rejected that ideology and has a good understanding of how that system works to undermine American democracy and freedom.  On his webside he warns of how Islam and other groups are being used to destroy the freedoms we as a country have fought and died for.  LongGone is a mouthpiece and apologist for every left wing cause the Democrats stand for even though he says he is a "moderate."  The idea of bringing in thousands of Muslims into this country and justifying it by claiming to know a few Muslims personally who aren't radicals is nuts.  Here is a portion of an article by Daniel Greenfield on "HOW ISLAM IN AMERICA BECAME A PRIVILEGED RELIGION."

?Islam is a theocracy. When it leaves the territories conquered by Islam, it seeks to replicate that theocracy through violence and by adapting the legal codes of the host society to suit its purposes.?

?Religions in America traded theocracy for religious freedom. They gave up being able to impose their practices on others in exchange for being able to freely practice their own religions. Islam rejects religious freedom. It exploits it to remove the freedom of belief and practice of others. When it cannot do so through religious protection laws, it does so through claims of bigotry.?
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/257819/how-islam-america-became-privileged-religion-daniel-greenfield

Interesting enough I have had Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses and Evangelicals at my door trying to win me to their faith. Never had a Muslim try to convert me. Worked with quite a few Muslims and they never tried to convert me either. It is about 1% of the population. I grew up IFB and remember the preaching on how the Communists were going to take over by 1976. We would never see the Bi-Centennial. Just like this is was a case of misplaced fear.

You claim that I am a mouthpiece for the left. On the forum you sound like a right wing bigot that fears everything different from him. It is not hard to believe that if you lived in another era that you would be afraid of freeing slaves, Chinese immigrants, Japanese-Americans during WW II, the end of segregation and a Catholic POTUS.

Horowitz has his own bias also. His parents actually left the Communist Party USA when he was 17. He has made false accusations against the University of Northern Colorado. He claimed a student received a failing grade fore refusing to write an essay arguing that Bush was a war criminal. It turned out that there was not an essay and the said student received a passing but poor grade for not doing well on the test. The professor (Robert Dunkley) he claimed was so liberal was a Republican.

He also claimed a biology teacher at Penn State showed a movie just before the 2004 election to influence the election. He had to retract that claim.

There is a fifty page report from Free Exchange showing Horowitz's books contain factual errors,unsubstantiated assertions and quotations which appear to be either misquoted or taken out of context.

I can see where you and Horowitz would be on the same page of fear when it came to Muslims. Horowitz accused the Muslim Students Association  of supporting a second Holocaust of the Jews. In reality the Muslim Students Association had been involved in interfaith activities with Jewish student groups and in charity work or national disaster relief.

Biscuit just keep the fear mongering going. It so Christ like :

You dare talk about David Horowitz by claiming he has made a couple of mistakes in the past while at the same time defending CNN?  The fact is Islam rejects religious freedom (deal with that) and the fruit of massive immigration to Dearborn, Minneapolis, Sweden, Germany, Italy, and every other place in the world that has turned into a hellhole is evident before all the world.

You claim to be a Christian and a moderate while at the same time defending the mutilation of one's body whether children or adults because they believe they are the opposite sex from which they were born.  You defend Planned Parenthood which sells body parts of dead infants for profit,  you defend men walking into the same restroom and shower rooms my wife and daughter use and you actively defend sex acts between men with other men.  You aren't a "radical" you are a moderate Democrat.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

The fact is Islam rejects religious freedom (deal with that) and the fruit of massive immigration to Dearborn, Minneapolis, Sweden, Germany, Italy, and every other place in the world that has turned into a hellhole is evident before all the world.

Yet YOU are the one wanting to restrict the practice of Islam in the US. Seems you are supporting  the restriction of religious freedom yourself.

Besides, radical Islam is the extremist fringe of Islam. Here is their belief about freedom of religion:

The Holy Quran altogether excludes compulsion from the sphere of religion. It lays down in the clearest words:

    ?There is no compulsion in religion ? the right way is indeed clearly distinct from error.?? 2:256

In fact, the Holy Quran is full of statements showing that belief in this or that religion is a person?s own concern, and that he is given the choice of adopting one way or another. If he accepts the truth, it is for his own good, and that, if he sticks to error, it is to his own detriment. Some quotations to this effect are given below:

    ?The Truth is from your Lord; so let him who please believe and let him who please disbelieve.? ? 18:29

    ?We have truly shown him the way; he may be thankful or unthankful.? ? 76:3

    ?Clear proofs have indeed come to you from your Lord: so whoever sees, it is for his own good; and whoever is blind, it is to his own harm. And I am not a keeper over you.? ? 6:104

    ?If you do good, you do good for your own souls. And if you do evil, it is for them.? ? 17:7

The duty of the Messenger of Allah, and, following him, the duty of every Muslim is only to deliver the message of truth and no more. This is indicated in the Holy Quran in passages of the following kind:

    ?If they accept Islam, then indeed they follow the right way; and if they turn back, your duty (O Prophet) is only to deliver the message.? ? 3:20

    ?And obey Allah and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away, the duty of Our Messenger is only to deliver the message clearly.? ? 64:12; see also 5:92

    ?Say (to people): Obey Allah and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away, he is responsible for the duty imposed on him, and you are responsible for the duty imposed on you. And if you obey him, you go aright. And the Messenger?s duty is only to deliver (the message) plainly.? ? 24:54

    ?O people, the truth has indeed come to you from your Lord; so whoever goes aright, goes aright only for the good of his own soul; and whoever errs, errs only to its detriment. And I am not a custodian over you.? ? 10:108

    ?Surely We have revealed to you (O Prophet) the Book with truth for people. So whoever follows the right way, it is for his own soul, and whoever errs, he errs only to its detriment. And you are not a custodian over them.? ? 39:41

    ?We have not appointed you (O Prophet) a keeper over them, and you are not placed in charge of them.? ? 6:107

    ?Your duty (O Prophet) is only the delivery of the message, and Ours (God?s) is to call (people) to account.? ? 13:40

The Quran tells us that it is in the natural order of things that while some people believe others do not, and no human being can or should apply compulsion to others in this regard. The Holy Prophet Muhammad is told:

    ?And if your Lord had pleased, all those who are in the earth would have believed, all of them. Will you then force people till they are believers?? ? 10:99

All nations are addressed as follows:

    ?For everyone of you We appointed a law and a way. And if Allah had pleased He would have made you a single people (or one religious community), but that He might try you in what He gave you. So vie one with another in virtuous deeds. To Allah you will all return, so He will inform you of that wherein you differed.? ? 5:48

Source

Oh, considering there are 3.3 million Muslims in the US, when was the last time a Muslim bombed a church in the US? When was the last time a Muslim mosque was bombed in the US? Hmmm....

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

The fact is Islam rejects religious freedom (deal with that) and the fruit of massive immigration to Dearborn, Minneapolis, Sweden, Germany, Italy, and every other place in the world that has turned into a hellhole is evident before all the world.

Yet YOU are the one wanting to restrict the practice of Islam in the US. Seems you are supporting  the restriction of religious freedom yourself.

Besides, radical Islam is the extremist fringe of Islam. Here is their belief about freedom of religion:

The Holy Quran altogether excludes compulsion from the sphere of religion. It lays down in the clearest words:

    ?There is no compulsion in religion ? the right way is indeed clearly distinct from error.?? 2:256

In fact, the Holy Quran is full of statements showing that belief in this or that religion is a person?s own concern, and that he is given the choice of adopting one way or another. If he accepts the truth, it is for his own good, and that, if he sticks to error, it is to his own detriment. Some quotations to this effect are given below:

    ?The Truth is from your Lord; so let him who please believe and let him who please disbelieve.? ? 18:29

    ?We have truly shown him the way; he may be thankful or unthankful.? ? 76:3

    ?Clear proofs have indeed come to you from your Lord: so whoever sees, it is for his own good; and whoever is blind, it is to his own harm. And I am not a keeper over you.? ? 6:104

    ?If you do good, you do good for your own souls. And if you do evil, it is for them.? ? 17:7

The duty of the Messenger of Allah, and, following him, the duty of every Muslim is only to deliver the message of truth and no more. This is indicated in the Holy Quran in passages of the following kind:

    ?If they accept Islam, then indeed they follow the right way; and if they turn back, your duty (O Prophet) is only to deliver the message.? ? 3:20

    ?And obey Allah and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away, the duty of Our Messenger is only to deliver the message clearly.? ? 64:12; see also 5:92

    ?Say (to people): Obey Allah and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away, he is responsible for the duty imposed on him, and you are responsible for the duty imposed on you. And if you obey him, you go aright. And the Messenger?s duty is only to deliver (the message) plainly.? ? 24:54

    ?O people, the truth has indeed come to you from your Lord; so whoever goes aright, goes aright only for the good of his own soul; and whoever errs, errs only to its detriment. And I am not a custodian over you.? ? 10:108

    ?Surely We have revealed to you (O Prophet) the Book with truth for people. So whoever follows the right way, it is for his own soul, and whoever errs, he errs only to its detriment. And you are not a custodian over them.? ? 39:41

    ?We have not appointed you (O Prophet) a keeper over them, and you are not placed in charge of them.? ? 6:107

    ?Your duty (O Prophet) is only the delivery of the message, and Ours (God?s) is to call (people) to account.? ? 13:40

The Quran tells us that it is in the natural order of things that while some people believe others do not, and no human being can or should apply compulsion to others in this regard. The Holy Prophet Muhammad is told:

    ?And if your Lord had pleased, all those who are in the earth would have believed, all of them. Will you then force people till they are believers?? ? 10:99

All nations are addressed as follows:

    ?For everyone of you We appointed a law and a way. And if Allah had pleased He would have made you a single people (or one religious community), but that He might try you in what He gave you. So vie one with another in virtuous deeds. To Allah you will all return, so He will inform you of that wherein you differed.? ? 5:48

Source

Oh, considering there are 3.3 million Muslims in the US, when was the last time a Muslim bombed a church in the US? When was the last time a Muslim mosque was bombed in the US? Hmmm....

Because murder of innocents only counts if they're in a church when it happens! 

 

[Smellin Coffee]

The fact is Islam rejects religious freedom (deal with that) and the fruit of massive immigration to Dearborn, Minneapolis, Sweden, Germany, Italy, and every other place in the world that has turned into a hellhole is evident before all the world.

Yet YOU are the one wanting to restrict the practice of Islam in the US. Seems you are supporting  the restriction of religious freedom yourself.

Besides, radical Islam is the extremist fringe of Islam. Here is their belief about freedom of religion:

The Holy Quran altogether excludes compulsion from the sphere of religion. It lays down in the clearest words:

    ?There is no compulsion in religion ? the right way is indeed clearly distinct from error.?? 2:256

In fact, the Holy Quran is full of statements showing that belief in this or that religion is a person?s own concern, and that he is given the choice of adopting one way or another. If he accepts the truth, it is for his own good, and that, if he sticks to error, it is to his own detriment. Some quotations to this effect are given below:

    ?The Truth is from your Lord; so let him who please believe and let him who please disbelieve.? ? 18:29

    ?We have truly shown him the way; he may be thankful or unthankful.? ? 76:3

    ?Clear proofs have indeed come to you from your Lord: so whoever sees, it is for his own good; and whoever is blind, it is to his own harm. And I am not a keeper over you.? ? 6:104

    ?If you do good, you do good for your own souls. And if you do evil, it is for them.? ? 17:7

The duty of the Messenger of Allah, and, following him, the duty of every Muslim is only to deliver the message of truth and no more. This is indicated in the Holy Quran in passages of the following kind:

    ?If they accept Islam, then indeed they follow the right way; and if they turn back, your duty (O Prophet) is only to deliver the message.? ? 3:20

    ?And obey Allah and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away, the duty of Our Messenger is only to deliver the message clearly.? ? 64:12; see also 5:92

    ?Say (to people): Obey Allah and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away, he is responsible for the duty imposed on him, and you are responsible for the duty imposed on you. And if you obey him, you go aright. And the Messenger?s duty is only to deliver (the message) plainly.? ? 24:54

    ?O people, the truth has indeed come to you from your Lord; so whoever goes aright, goes aright only for the good of his own soul; and whoever errs, errs only to its detriment. And I am not a custodian over you.? ? 10:108

    ?Surely We have revealed to you (O Prophet) the Book with truth for people. So whoever follows the right way, it is for his own soul, and whoever errs, he errs only to its detriment. And you are not a custodian over them.? ? 39:41

    ?We have not appointed you (O Prophet) a keeper over them, and you are not placed in charge of them.? ? 6:107

    ?Your duty (O Prophet) is only the delivery of the message, and Ours (God?s) is to call (people) to account.? ? 13:40

The Quran tells us that it is in the natural order of things that while some people believe others do not, and no human being can or should apply compulsion to others in this regard. The Holy Prophet Muhammad is told:

    ?And if your Lord had pleased, all those who are in the earth would have believed, all of them. Will you then force people till they are believers?? ? 10:99

All nations are addressed as follows:

    ?For everyone of you We appointed a law and a way. And if Allah had pleased He would have made you a single people (or one religious community), but that He might try you in what He gave you. So vie one with another in virtuous deeds. To Allah you will all return, so He will inform you of that wherein you differed.? ? 5:48

Source

Oh, considering there are 3.3 million Muslims in the US, when was the last time a Muslim bombed a church in the US? When was the last time a Muslim mosque was bombed in the US? Hmmm....

Because murder of innocents only counts if they're in a church when it happens! 

So you are suggesting Muslims are murderers?

Good thing I don't label Christians by the actions of the LRA.

 

[biscuit1953]

The fact is Islam rejects religious freedom (deal with that) and the fruit of massive immigration to Dearborn, Minneapolis, Sweden, Germany, Italy, and every other place in the world that has turned into a hellhole is evident before all the world.

Yet YOU are the one wanting to restrict the practice of Islam in the US. Seems you are supporting  the restriction of religious freedom yourself.

Besides, radical Islam is the extremist fringe of Islam. Here is their belief about freedom of religion:

The Holy Quran altogether excludes compulsion from the sphere of religion. It lays down in the clearest words:

    ?There is no compulsion in religion ? the right way is indeed clearly distinct from error.?? 2:256

In fact, the Holy Quran is full of statements showing that belief in this or that religion is a person?s own concern, and that he is given the choice of adopting one way or another. If he accepts the truth, it is for his own good, and that, if he sticks to error, it is to his own detriment. Some quotations to this effect are given below:

    ?The Truth is from your Lord; so let him who please believe and let him who please disbelieve.? ? 18:29

    ?We have truly shown him the way; he may be thankful or unthankful.? ? 76:3

    ?Clear proofs have indeed come to you from your Lord: so whoever sees, it is for his own good; and whoever is blind, it is to his own harm. And I am not a keeper over you.? ? 6:104

    ?If you do good, you do good for your own souls. And if you do evil, it is for them.? ? 17:7

The duty of the Messenger of Allah, and, following him, the duty of every Muslim is only to deliver the message of truth and no more. This is indicated in the Holy Quran in passages of the following kind:

    ?If they accept Islam, then indeed they follow the right way; and if they turn back, your duty (O Prophet) is only to deliver the message.? ? 3:20

    ?And obey Allah and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away, the duty of Our Messenger is only to deliver the message clearly.? ? 64:12; see also 5:92

    ?Say (to people): Obey Allah and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away, he is responsible for the duty imposed on him, and you are responsible for the duty imposed on you. And if you obey him, you go aright. And the Messenger?s duty is only to deliver (the message) plainly.? ? 24:54

    ?O people, the truth has indeed come to you from your Lord; so whoever goes aright, goes aright only for the good of his own soul; and whoever errs, errs only to its detriment. And I am not a custodian over you.? ? 10:108

    ?Surely We have revealed to you (O Prophet) the Book with truth for people. So whoever follows the right way, it is for his own soul, and whoever errs, he errs only to its detriment. And you are not a custodian over them.? ? 39:41

    ?We have not appointed you (O Prophet) a keeper over them, and you are not placed in charge of them.? ? 6:107

    ?Your duty (O Prophet) is only the delivery of the message, and Ours (God?s) is to call (people) to account.? ? 13:40

The Quran tells us that it is in the natural order of things that while some people believe others do not, and no human being can or should apply compulsion to others in this regard. The Holy Prophet Muhammad is told:

    ?And if your Lord had pleased, all those who are in the earth would have believed, all of them. Will you then force people till they are believers?? ? 10:99

All nations are addressed as follows:

    ?For everyone of you We appointed a law and a way. And if Allah had pleased He would have made you a single people (or one religious community), but that He might try you in what He gave you. So vie one with another in virtuous deeds. To Allah you will all return, so He will inform you of that wherein you differed.? ? 5:48

Source

Oh, considering there are 3.3 million Muslims in the US, when was the last time a Muslim bombed a church in the US? When was the last time a Muslim mosque was bombed in the US? Hmmm....

Because murder of innocents only counts if they're in a church when it happens! 

So you are suggesting Muslims are murderers?

Good thing I don't label Christians by the actions of the LRA.

You're delusional.  Every place on earth where mass migration of Muslims take place results in the society breaking down.  Just study places like Sweden, Germany, Italy, Greece, Dearborn etc. etc.

The number of hand grenade attacks in Sweden has risen by 550 per cent in just three years.  According to Peter Hejdstr?m, head of police investigation in Halmstad, the explosives  ? which are typically thrown by hand  ? are not a problem that is restricted to the big cities, as the widespread availability of grenades in Sweden means even rural areas have been affected.  In September, Breitbart London reported on how a migrant who fled the Somali Civil War 20 years ago said he was considering moving back to his homeland because Sweden has become a ?war zone?.

Interviewed at a secret location, Dame said he and his family are on the run from criminal gangs that now rule the Gothenburg suburbs, telling Norwegian public broadcaster NRK: ?It?s like a war zone. We do not know who gets shot. Bullets can hit you anywhere.?

And former soldiers now working in the police bomb disposal unit of Malm?, where 43 per cent of inhabitants have foreign backgrounds, have said the constant grenade attacks in Sweden?s third largest city remind them of the years they served in war-torn regions of Iraq.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/08/06/hand-grenade-attacks-sevenfold-sweden/

View image on Twitter