Was Christ a Geocentrist?

Yes, but I also think God can use natural events for his purposes.
absolutely.... He can use anything He wants, or a combination of things together ..... faith doesn;t require an explanation.. ...but i always found it a lot of fun anyway to think these things through... and wonder how the various miracles played out.... ... but to me it;s not a matter of could God have done something.. but simply how did He choose to do it?....
 
Last edited:
It still doesn't make sense in the context of Joshua 10. How does an annular eclipse extend daylight for the length of an entire day? How can it be said that God did the bidding of a human being (v. 14) if the event described was a routine astronomical one?
Because you’re using literal language, not figurative. I’m not we’ll-versed in ancient Hebrew and Aramaic, but in just glancing over a few resources online, it became quickly apparent that the word “stop” doesn’t exactly mean what it does in today’s language. It was then used in the context of a “slowing down” than today’s version of a complete halt. Obviously you understand that Joshua wouldn’t have viewed ancient science through today’s lenses. I believe God used a natural event for a supernatural purpose in extending light through this eclipse. Perhaps I’m wrong, but this idea of an “extended day” can be found in the writings other ancient cultures as well. Modern day research seems to be lending proof to this idea based on what I’ve just done some light research on. Perhaps God did literally stop the rotation of the earth, but I believe the eclipse is a scientific explanation for an ancient phenomenon.
 
Because you’re using literal language, not figurative. I’m not we’ll-versed in ancient Hebrew and Aramaic, but in just glancing over a few resources online, it became quickly apparent that the word “stop” doesn’t exactly mean what it does in today’s language. It was then used in the context of a “slowing down” than today’s version of a complete halt. Obviously you understand that Joshua wouldn’t have viewed ancient science through today’s lenses. I believe God used a natural event for a supernatural purpose in extending light through this eclipse. Perhaps I’m wrong, but this idea of an “extended day” can be found in the writings other ancient cultures as well. Modern day research seems to be lending proof to this idea based on what I’ve just done some light research on. Perhaps God did literally stop the rotation of the earth, but I believe the eclipse is a scientific explanation for an ancient phenomenon.
You're using a lot of words but not saying very much.

What is Joshua 10 about if not a battle during which God miraculously lengthened the day? Saying "the context of a 'slowing down'" doesn't change the nature of the problem. Joshua's pre-scientific worldview isn't relevant to the question. How does an eclipse "extend light"? If anything, it dims light. It's clear that the story means more than "and then an eclipse happened."
 
You're using a lot of words but not saying very much.

What is Joshua 10 about if not a battle during which God miraculously lengthened the day? Saying "the context of a 'slowing down'" doesn't change the nature of the problem. Joshua's pre-scientific worldview isn't relevant to the question. How does an eclipse "extend light"? If anything, it dims light. It's clear that the story means more than "and then an eclipse happened."
I don’t understand why you aren’t getting this. The light wasn’t dimmed, it was extended. Here’s NASA’s definition: “An annular solar eclipse happens when the Moon passes between the Sun and Earth, but while the Moon is at its farthest point from Earth. Because the Moon is farther away from Earth, it appears smaller and does not block the entire face of the Sun.”
 
I don’t understand why you aren’t getting this. The light wasn’t dimmed, it was extended. Here’s NASA’s definition: “An annular solar eclipse happens when the Moon passes between the Sun and Earth, but while the Moon is at its farthest point from Earth. Because the Moon is farther away from Earth, it appears smaller and does not block the entire face of the Sun.”
He's got the same question I do on your position...you state it could have been an eclipse. Valid point is that an eclipse dims the light, it doesn't extend it.
 
He's got the same question I do on your position...you state it could have been an eclipse. Valid point is that an eclipse dims the light, it doesn't extend it.
An annular eclipse and an ordinary solar eclipse are not the same. One extends “daylight” while the other doesn’t.
 
I don’t understand why you aren’t getting this. The light wasn’t dimmed, it was extended.
But that's exactly what I don't understand: how is an eclipse supposed to extend the light? The sun and the moon continue in their normal, regular courses. It just so happens that a few times a year, they cross paths in the sky. A solar eclipse is just the moon's shadow on the earth. The day is still 24 hours long, and high tides still happen every 12 and a half hours.
 
But that's exactly what I don't understand: how is an eclipse supposed to extend the light? The sun and the moon continue in their normal, regular courses. It just so happens that a few times a year, they cross paths in the sky. A solar eclipse is just the moon's shadow on the earth. The day is still 24 hours long, and high tides still happen every 12 and a half hours.
I’ll explain with a picture because I’m obviously failing with words. Light (I won’t call it “daylight”) is extended for up to 12+ hours. 1661649736680.jpeg
 
I’ll explain with a picture because I’m obviously failing with words. Light (I won’t call it “daylight”) is extended for up to 12+ hours.

I know what an annular eclipse is. I was right under one on May 10, 1994, when it passed over Waterloo, Ontario. We're not questioning the nature of an annular eclipse. We don't understand what you mean when you say "light is extended for up to 12+ hours." Because I can assure you that day wasn't any longer than usual.
 
Last edited:
I know what an annular eclipse is. I was right under one on May 10, 1994, when it passed over Waterloo, Ontario. We're not questioning the nature of an annular eclipse. We don't understand what you mean when you say "light is extended for up to 12+ hours." Because I can assure you that day wasn't any longer than usual.
Your geographic location comes into play with respect to how much light you’re able to observe from the annulus. Perhaps being in Canada it would be different than, say, Argentina. Also, the Earth is not the same shape as in biblical days.
 
Your geographic location comes into play with respect to how much light you’re able to observe from the annulus.

I'm not talking about the amount of light. I want to know what you mean when you say the light is "extended." Are you saying the eclipse makes the day longer, or not?

Perhaps being in Canada it would be different than, say, Argentina.

No, the same physical laws apply.

Also, the Earth is not the same shape as in biblical days.

Come on.
 
No, only the *appearance* of it. It was likely some combination of an eclipse and refracted light in the atmosphere.
You should just admit that no science was involved in the miraculous lengthening of a day in Joshua 10, and then you wouldn't have to keep flailing for scientific-sounding words.
 
You should just admit that no science was involved in the miraculous lengthening of a day in Joshua 10, and then you wouldn't have to keep flailing for scientific-sounding words.
I clearly stated very early on it’s a plausible *theory.* I also very clearly stated that maybe God literally did stop the rotation of the earth. BTW, this theory has been floated around in documented form since the 1870s—at minimum. The recent scholarly work has just begun to lend credence to those notions. I’m not sure why you’re so threatened by God performing miracles through natural processes on earth.
 
To say "this is that" is a metaphor. Thank you again for proving my point.
To say "this is that" is a definition.

To say, "Behold the Lamb," employs a metaphor. To say "Feed my Sheep" employs a metaphor.

To say "Love your enemies in your works, because God does the same thing in His," an imperative. There is no symbolism employed.
 
Back
Top