I think it's pretty obvious I was referring to the leftists praising Carter.
There isn't. Not biblically. And not psychologically either, till the 19th century with writings of Freud in particular and Jung. And no one here will allow you to assert unchallenged that there is such a thing as a biologically gay person.
There's no such thing as a straight person either. There is fornication (and a descending list of aberations) and there is marriage. I guess you think that's foolish and erroneous, too. But we've already hashed that out.
You'll have to remind me, but I doubt the others here are as naive as you presume.
I am? In what way?
I don't look down on you, or Smelly, but are you saying here that you see your 'gayness' as a failure?
Puh-leeze.
I don't. I'd love to debate Premillennialism, especially Dispensational Premillennialism, Covenant Theology, the interpretation of Revelation, A valid cosmological model, etc...
But there's little interest in those things (and a lot of sacred cows).
But when one engages the culture, sex is nearly impossible not to at least alude to, because the culture puts it in your face. You are a prime example of that. The very statement of your assumed identity is all about sex. Why should we know you're 'gay'? What's the point if it's not to let us know you what gets you off?
It's not so with marriage (and there's no such thing as gay marriage). Marriage is about God, and children, family and society. Sex is a part of marriage, but such a small part. And it's not the point of marriage. Food is a part of supper, but it's not the point of supper. Once it becomes the point, then it's drunkenness.
And neither is sex the point of my divorce. I am not engaging in fornication. One can say he is married or he is divorced, and no one's first thought is about the sex he prefers.
But say you're gay....