Former First Lady Rosalynn Carter in Hospice Care

Dude, the majority of our interaction about your Carter worship has been about his legacy. What else would I mean by "agree with me"....

Oh, oh, oh, oh, it just occurred to me.

You tie his political worth to his nominal Christianity, trying to make something more of him than he actually was. Have it your way, but you'll have a tough time explaining why I would feel like I have to lie about what I was referring to. 'Afraid of Gringo.' Puh-leeze! :rolleyes:
If you say so…OK. You sure have an odd way of wording your sentences at times.
 
Dude, the majority of our interaction about your Carter worship has been about his legacy. What else would I mean by "agree with me"....

Oh, oh, oh, oh, it just occurred to me.

You tie his political worth to his nominal Christianity, trying to make something more of him than he actually was. Have it your way, but you'll have a tough time explaining why I would feel like I have to lie about what I was referring to. 'Afraid of Gringo.' Puh-leeze! :rolleyes:

.
Indeed, there's nothing to fear from me. I'm absolutely harmless - an old teddy bear.

No offense, but the only thing you need to fear on this forum is your own inconsistency. Ever since you made the foolish and erronious statement that there is no such thing as a gay person, I've been watching your posts. Silently, for the most part. You may have noticed (or maybe not) that I didn't respond when you told Dr HuknDuk that he kept strange company (referring to me). That was ok. I didn't respond when you used an absolutely vulgar and vile "gay" term that the others here probably didn't even pick up on. But a lightbulb began to go off for me. I didn't respond the other day when you read the other apostate's post here in a sexual way, when he wasn't referring to sex. Your mind seems to be centered on sex and yet . . .
And yet . . .

And yet, you are so concerned about others' spiritual states. You are very inconsistent. I think you are nothing more than a troll because your posts don't make sense to me alot of the time.

One of the main theme's of the Bible is that of marriage - that one man and one woman were to cling to one another for life and be fruitful and multiply. Jesus, the "star of the show", the Son of God, Himself, in more than one place - in several places, admonished one to not divorce and yet you disobeyed Him. And that's your business. I know nothing of your personal life and why you divorced and it's none of my business anyway. But I just don't understand how you can look down on people like me, look down on Jimmy Carter, look down on Smellin Coffee and others, when you have failed too. You should show a little grace. And try to be a little more consistent. If you really are a person (in real life) that fears God, that reveres the bible and its writings and not a troll, then go back to your wife and if you can't do that, at least stop talking about sex all of the time while you denigrate others. And show a little grace.

The only thing you need to fear on this forum is your own inconsistency.
.
 
.
Indeed, there's nothing to fear from me. I'm absolutely harmless - an old teddy bear.

No offense, but the only thing you need to fear on this forum is your own inconsistency. Ever since you made the foolish and erronious statement that there is no such thing as a gay person, I've been watching your posts. Silently, for the most part. You may have noticed (or maybe not) that I didn't respond when you told Dr HuknDuk that he kept strange company (referring to me). That was ok. I didn't respond when you used an absolutely vulgar and vile "gay" term that the others here probably didn't even pick up on. But a lightbulb began to go off for me. I didn't respond the other day when you read the other apostate's post here in a sexual way, when he wasn't referring to sex. Your mind seems to be centered on sex and yet . . .
And yet . . .

And yet, you are so concerned about others' spiritual states. You are very inconsistent. I think you are nothing more than a troll because your posts don't make sense to me alot of the time.

One of the main theme's of the Bible is that of marriage - that one man and one woman were to cling to one another for life and be fruitful and multiply. Jesus, the "star of the show", the Son of God, Himself, in more than one place - in several places, admonished one to not divorce and yet you disobeyed Him. And that's your business. I know nothing of your personal life and why you divorced and it's none of my business anyway. But I just don't understand how you can look down on people like me, look down on Jimmy Carter, look down on Smellin Coffee and others, when you have failed too. You should show a little grace. And try to be a little more consistent. If you really are a person (in real life) that fears God, that reveres the bible and its writings and not a troll, then go back to your wife and if you can't do that, at least stop talking about sex all of the time while you denigrate others. And show a little grace.

The only thing you need to fear on this forum is your own inconsistency.
.
For what it’s worth, I’ve always felt like Ekkk is more than likely a troll (actually sock puppet) but I don’t know factually he is. I have noticed some similarities in postings between he and another user or two, and I’ve also noticed that, despite his online behaviors, certain other individuals on this forum now seem to cheer him on and are perfectly content with his behaviors and manifest that by their silence. I’m not trying to judge any particular person/people and what they do, I’m just making observations and drawing conclusions.

Anyway, for what it’s worth, I enjoy having a garden variety of people and opinions on the forum, so I hope you stick around. I know most people on here would like everyone to “fit in a box” when it comes to political and spiritual issues, but I’d rather be authentic and not be in the box, even if that means I’m appearing inconsistent or hypocritical at times.
 
Last edited:
Silently, for the most part. You may have noticed (or maybe not) that I didn't respond when you told Dr HuknDuk that he kept strange company (referring to me).
I think it's pretty obvious I was referring to the leftists praising Carter.

Ever since you made the foolish and erronious statement that there is no such thing as a gay person,
There isn't. Not biblically. And not psychologically either, till the 19th century with writings of Freud in particular and Jung. And no one here will allow you to assert unchallenged that there is such a thing as a biologically gay person.

There's no such thing as a straight person either. There is fornication (and a descending list of aberations) and there is marriage. I guess you think that's foolish and erroneous, too. But we've already hashed that out.

I didn't respond when you used an absolutely vulgar and vile "gay" term that the others here probably didn't even pick up on.
You'll have to remind me, but I doubt the others here are as naive as you presume.

And yet, you are so concerned about others' spiritual states.
I am? In what way?

But I just don't understand how you can look down on people like me, look down on Jimmy Carter, look down on Smellin Coffee and others, when you have failed too.
I don't look down on you, or Smelly, but are you saying here that you see your 'gayness' as a failure?

You should show a little grace.
Puh-leeze. :rolleyes:


at least stop talking about sex all of the time
I don't. I'd love to debate Premillennialism, especially Dispensational Premillennialism, Covenant Theology, the interpretation of Revelation, A valid cosmological model, etc...

But there's little interest in those things (and a lot of sacred cows).

But when one engages the culture, sex is nearly impossible not to at least alude to, because the culture puts it in your face. You are a prime example of that. The very statement of your assumed identity is all about sex. Why should we know you're 'gay'? What's the point if it's not to let us know you what gets you off?

It's not so with marriage (and there's no such thing as gay marriage). Marriage is about God, and children, family and society. Sex is a part of marriage, but such a small part. And it's not the point of marriage. Food is a part of supper, but it's not the point of supper. Once it becomes the point, then it's drunkenness.

And neither is sex the point of my divorce. I am not engaging in fornication. One can say he is married or he is divorced, and no one's first thought is about the sex he prefers.

But say you're gay....
 
I think it's pretty obvious I was referring to the leftists praising Carter.


There isn't. Not biblically. And not psychologically either, till the 19th century with writings of Freud in particular and Jung. And no one here will allow you to assert unchallenged that there is such a thing as a biologically gay person.

There's no such thing as a straight person either. There is fornication (and a descending list of aberations) and there is marriage. I guess you think that's foolish and erroneous, too. But we've already hashed that out.


You'll have to remind me, but I doubt the others here are as naive as you presume.


I am? In what way?


I don't look down on you, or Smelly, but are you saying here that you see your 'gayness' as a failure?


Puh-leeze. :rolleyes:



I don't. I'd love to debate Premillennialism, especially Dispensational Premillennialism, Covenant Theology, the interpretation of Revelation, A valid cosmological model, etc...

But there's little interest in those things (and a lot of sacred cows).

But when one engages the culture, sex is nearly impossible not to at least alude to, because the culture puts it in your face. You are a prime example of that. The very statement of your assumed identity is all about sex. Why should we know you're 'gay'? What's the point if it's not to let us know you what gets you off?

It's not so with marriage (and there's no such thing as gay marriage). Marriage is about God, and children, family and society. Sex is a part of marriage, but such a small part. And it's not the point of marriage. Food is a part of supper, but it's not the point of supper. Once it becomes the point, then it's drunkenness.

And neither is sex the point of my divorce. I am not engaging in fornication. One can say he is married or he is divorced, and no one's first thought is about the sex he prefers.

But say you're gay....

I’ve said it before, but your style of communication is clunky, putting it politely.
 
For what it’s worth, I’ve always felt like Ekkk is more than likely a troll (actually sock puppet) but I don’t know factually he is. I have noticed some similarities in postings between he and another user or two, and I’ve also noticed that, despite his online behaviors, certain other individuals on this forum now seem to cheer him on and are perfectly content with his behaviors and manifest that by their silence. I’m not trying to judge any particular person/people and what they do, I’m just making observations and drawing conclusions.

Anyway, for what it’s worth, I enjoy having a garden variety of people and opinions on the forum, so I hope you stick around. I know most people on here would like everyone to “fit in a box” when it comes to political and spiritual issues, but I’d rather be authentic and not be in the box, even if that means I’m appearing inconsistent or hypocritical at times.
so... you want people here to call ekk out for his online behavior?.. ..and you get upset that people ignore certain threads and have nothing to say on others?..... it would be fair to expect that.. but who calls you out for your online behavior?..... ... ...do you rmember this very disgusting post you made about me a few days ago?

HukNDuck said........ What’s always funny to me is when I hear a young person squawking like a little parrot about who the best and worst presidents are. Carter is always an easy target simply because he’s still a contemporary figure. They often say something like this: “President Carter was the worst president until Biden came along and rescued him from dead last place!” It’s always apparent the little parrot has no understanding of American history and just repeats what was heard from the parents. So…Carter is worse than the guy who ushered in the Great Depression? The American Civil War? Decades of legalized segregation after slavery ended? Etc.? Cute little parrot….😎https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/06/30/presidential-rankings-2021-cspan-historians/
who called you out on that little piece of garbage?.... from what i can tell nobody did... . even the person i had just replied to above that... and who you want everybody to rush to the defense of... said nothing.... he remained silent..... ... it was as if he never saw it.... .. and for all i know maybe he didn;t.... not everyone on this forum carries the internet around with them in their pocket all day like you do..... i don;t - there are a lot of things i miss and never see..... but recently someone who lurks and reads this forum has started pointing out to me some of your side ways slanderous references - and carelessly tossed around trash.. specifically the ones you are referencing me with... .. and i am not going to ignore it any longer...... ......if you want fair play here then play fair...... stop playing this hypocritical game of words

and... by the way..... speaking of noticing similarities between posters and pinning down sockpuppets - there was a poster here not long ago that you have started to remind me of.... he was also obsessed ..even enamored.. with a controversial politician... talked about fishing in brackish water and even posted pictures very similar to the avatar you have now as his own avatar... ...should we try to draw a conclusion or just do like you do and toss the idea out there as some vague sideways slander?... .or maybe we should just think of it as a coincidence?...... ..what do you say?....
 
Last edited:
so... you want people here to call ekk out for his online behavior... ..and you get upset that people ignore certain threads and have nothing to say on others?..... it would be fair to expect that.. but who calls you out for your online behavior?..... ... ...do you rmember this very disgusting post you made about me a few days ago?


who called you out on that little piece of garbage?.... from what i can tell nobody did... . even the person i had just replied to above that... and who you want everybody to rush to the defense of... said nothing.... he remained silent..... ... it was as if he never saw it.... .. and for all i know maybe he didn;t.... not everyone on this forum carries the internet around with them in their pocket all day like you do..... i don;t - there are a lot of things i miss and never see..... but recently someone who lurks and reads this forum has started pointing out to me some of your side ways slanderous references - and carelessly tossed around trash.. specifically the ones you are referencing me with... .. and i am not going to ignore it any longer...... ......if you want fair play here then play fair...... stop playing this hypocritical game of words
Why do you always assume every post is about you? Did I not say “young person”? I don’t know your age, but I was under the impression you’re in the ballpark of being near 40. I was referring to college aged kids who believe they know it all, specifically a couple kids I know. You don’t know every person I know in life, so unless I specifically call you out by name, stop assuming I am talking about you.

As for Ekk, I have no idea if he’s a sock puppet or what. Regardless, at least he’s usually polite.
 
Why do you always assume every post is about you? Did I not say “young person”? I don’t know your age, but I was under the impression you’re in the ballpark of being near 40. I was referring to college aged kids who believe they know it all, specifically a couple kids I know. You don’t know every person I know in life, so unless I specifically call you out by name, stop assuming I am talking about you.

As for Ekk, I have no idea if he’s a sock puppet or what. Regardless, at least he’s usually polite.
and you are a liar..... i had just made a post to gringo telling him what my dad had told me about carter when you posted that...... don;t try to play coy and obtuse here ... even in this answer above you don;t deny your post was about me... all you try to do is blow smoke around it... .... but you know what you did and you know why you did it...... its your style here and i am not the first person to notice it or the first person you have done it to....... ..do you want me to go back and dig up the posts?.....
 
and you are a liar..... i had just made a post to gringo telling him what my dad had told me about carter when you posted that...... don;t try to play coy and obtuse here ... even in this answer above you don;t deny your post was about me... all you try to do is blow smoke around it... .... but you know what you did and you know why you did it...... its your style here and i am not the first person to notice it or the first person you have done it to....... ..do you want me to go back and dig up the posts?.....
I’ve heard my dad say the same thing. (He’s wrong.) So? It’s extremely common in the conservative circles, especially among some of the IFB college kids I’ve encountered, which doesn’t apply to you, I don’t think. I didn’t notice your comment to Gringo.
 
I’ve heard my dad say the same thing. (He’s wrong.) So? It’s extremely common in the conservative circles, especially among some of the IFB college kids I’ve encountered, which doesn’t apply to you, I don’t think. I didn’t notice your comment to Gringo.
well... unlike you... i actually listen to my dad... the person who raised me... and i believe him..... especially when he is talking about events he witnessed and lived through - that happened before i was even born......
 
well... unlike you... i actually listen to my dad... the person who raised me... and i believe him..... especially when he is talking about events he witnessed and lived through - that happened before i was even born......
Just because he’s my dad doesn’t mean he’s correct about everything he has told me. Should my kid assume I’m right about everything I say just because I’m dad? I actually hope she critically analyzes everything I say. Judge my words against Scripture, history, and other cultures and people’s experiences. I won’t purposely teach anything I know is false. My dad, on the other hand, had a mentality of “just accept it because I said it.”
 
.
I dont see every post. In fact, I dont read every thread AND I dont come here every day. Even in the threads I participate in, sometimes because I dont come everyday, I lose out on what has been said, because I dont always scour the previous posts. In fact, there are often threads that I do see that I purposefully dont participate in because I know I would cause anger towards me if I did if I were to post honestly so I stay out of them and then, sometimes, Im inconsistent and do respond, like in this thread.

I guess it depends on what Ive had for breakfast. Im a mess. LOL.
.
 
.
I dont see every post. In fact, I dont read every thread AND I dont come here every day. Even in the threads I participate in, sometimes because I dont come everyday, I lose out on what has been said, because I dont always scour the previous posts. In fact, there are often threads that I do see that I purposefully dont participate in because I know I would cause anger towards me if I did if I were to post honestly so I stay out of them and then, sometimes, Im inconsistent and do respond, like in this thread.

I guess it depends on what Ive had for breakfast. Im a mess. LOL.
.
and i;m the same way... ..i miss a lot of things that happen here.... ..and purposefully stay out of some threads because i don;t know enough about whats going on.... ..it;s common for most people here i think.... ....but i have seen huknduck start making comments about the "silence being deafening" ..and jumping to the conclusion his point was correct - if 30 minutes went by on a new post and there was no answer....
 
Yup. Saw pictures from that. I don't expect Jimmy to hang around much longer....

I thought it was the ultimate in class that all of the surviving first ladies were present (whether I'd agree with them or not)

Say what you will about Donald, I've always felt that Melania brought an air of class to the WH that had been long absent.
 
Yup. Saw pictures from that. I don't expect Jimmy to hang around much longer....

I thought it was the ultimate in class that all of the surviving first ladies were present (whether I'd agree with them or not)

Say what you will about Donald, I've always felt that Melania brought an air of class to the WH that had been long absent.
I love Melania. I loved Donald too…but I don’t love him being his own worst enemy all the time. As I’ve said before, I may still end up voting for the guy, but he sure doesn’t make it easy on me.
 
I love Melania. I loved Donald too…but I don’t love him being his own worst enemy all the time. As I’ve said before, I may still end up voting for the guy, but he sure doesn’t make it easy on me.
Ditto
 
Top