Our Political Discourse.

Ransom said:
No one is actually scared of the little gay Mexican who thinks Hitler is cool.
Click to expand...
😂 you guys make me laugh, seriously.

Have you only watched reels or have you actually watched a full podcast of his?

How do you know he’s gay?
 
Ransom said:
Everyone knows Neo-Nazism is as gay as a daffodil.
Click to expand...
So have you only watched reels or have you watched an entire episode on his podcast?
 
Ransom said:
You're not denying he's a neo-Nazi homo.
Click to expand...
No I do not believe he is a neo-Nazi. I don’t know him if he’s gay. If I had to guess, I’d say no.

So have you only watched reels or have you watched an entire episode on his podcast?
 
Ransom said:
J. D. Vance is a "fat gay race traitor that married a jeet."

Duh is shocked--shocked--that I don't keep an open mind about Nick Fuentes.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1984292913757433905
Click to expand...
Just bc he used the word Jeet doesn’t mean he’s a racist. In my opinion. But I was raised to say things that you wouldn’t agree with. People are soft these days.
 
Ransom said:
You seem stupid. Are you a neo-Nazi?
Click to expand...
😂 youre killing me. Wow! No im not.

So have you only watched reels or have you watched an entire episode on his podcast?
 
Ransom said:
You seem stupid. Are you a neo-Nazi?
Click to expand...
Just bc someone listens to someone on a podcast doesn’t mean there’re a neo-Nazi

You are sounding very IFB.

So have you only watched reels or have you watched an entire episode on his podcast?
 
Bruh said:
Just bc he used the word Jeet doesn’t mean he’s a racist. In my opinion.
Click to expand...

How about calling Vance a "race traitor" and calling his wife a "jeet"?

Since you won't repudiate Fuentes, I have to assume you agree with his racism, and in addition to obvious limited intelligence, you're morally deficient to boot.
 
Ransom said:
How about calling Vance a race traiter and cling his wife a "jeet"?

Since you won't repudiate Fuentes, I have to assume you agree with his racism.
Click to expand...
If you were to listen to an entire podcast episode you’d know he’s referring to him as a race traitor bc he puts other country’s interests before Americans.

So have you only watched reels or have you watched an entire episode on his podcast?
 
Ransom said:
How about calling Vance a "race traitor" and calling his wife a "jeet"?

Since you won't repudiate Fuentes, I have to assume you agree with his racism, and in addition to obvious limited intelligence, you're morally deficient to boot.
Click to expand...
I already said, I’m with putting America first in any and all decisions. That’s his message and yes I’m with that.
 
It’s like taking verses out of context. You can make it say whatever you want.

If you @Ransom only listen to clips how can you know what he’s actually saying?
 
Bruh said:
If you were to listen to an entire podcast episode you’d know he’s referring to him as a race traitor bc he puts other country’s interests before Americans.
Click to expand...

Oh, so the fact that he called Vance a "race traitor" immediately before calling his wife a "jeet," in the same breath, is a mere coincidence?

Only a genuine white supremacist could be as retarded as you're presenting yourself to be.
 
Bruh said:
It’s like taking verses out of context. You can make it say whatever you want.
Click to expand...

You still haven't denied he's saying what I say he's saying.

At what point can I assume I'm right and that you agree with the repulsive little gay Mexican Nazi?
 
Ransom said:
Oh, so the fact that he called Vance a "race traitor" immediately before calling his wife a "jeet," in the same breath, is a mere coincidence?

Only a genuine white supremacist could be as retarded as you're presenting yourself to be.
Click to expand...
I’m not white, dude 😂 but an American first and foremost
 
Last edited:
Ransom said:
You still haven't denied he's saying what I say he's saying.

At what point can I assume I'm right and that you agree with the repulsive little gay Mexican Nazi?
Click to expand...
Ive denied it this entire conversation.
 
I would hope that anyone who watched the video that Ransom posted, even folks who do not know much about Nick Fuentes, would conclude that Nick Fuentes is a repulsive thug and weirdo whose opinions and rants should not be taken seriously. Christians and conservatives should not be promoting or defending him, or associating with him in any way. If the fundamentalist principle of "separation" means anything at all, it surely must mean that we should separate from Nick Fuentes and his ilk.
 
Bruh said:
So have you only watched reels or have you watched an entire episode on his podcast?
Click to expand...

There are 24 hours in the day. A third of that I spend sleeping; the remainder us spent primarily on productive pursuits, with a few hours left over for recreation.

Here is how I spend those recreation hours, currently:

images


Good stuff, recommended.

images


Bit weird but worth finishing.

Now, with free time being such a limited resource, can you give a succinct and persuasive reason why I should give some of O'Brian's and Ishiguro's up to watch a full podcast of your terminally online gay Mexican groyper neo-Nazi cult leader?

No?

I thought not. So in the interests of redeeming my time for more redeeming purposes, I'll continue to judge Fuentes by the clips. As I mentioned a few days ago, you can judge a book by its cover: it tells you what the book is about and what some people think of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top