Israel's High Priest & Red Heifer READY for Daniel Third Temple PROPHECY!

bigoldnick said:
This is crazy, Israel has trained and appointed a new high Priest for the first time in 2000 years and have selected a Red Heifer, its all ready and waiting for the altar and the third temple of Daniel’s prohecy to be rebuilt..check it out
Click to expand...

Jesus is the temple and the sacrifice now. Sprinkling dead cow around the Temple grounds won't sanctify it.

"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away" (Heb. 8:13), not to be revived.
 
Holy cow! :LOL:

Contrary to this video, Matthew 24 does not prophesy or make any mention of a restored temple. It is a prophecy of the destruction of a temple, specifically the Second Temple which was destroyed in 70 AD (within the lifetime or generation of those to whom Christ gave that prophecy, Matthew 24:34). There is nothing anywhere in the New Testament about a Third Temple being built.

This video is nothing more than the usual speculative and meaningless prophecy baloney. The narrator tells us that "every day brings us closer to the fulfillment of prophecy." Well, DUH! Did anybody think we were going backward in time?
 
I am growing more and more "Fluid" in my eschatology these days. Where exactly in the scriptures does it speak of a "restored temple" fashioned after the one that was destroyed in 70 AD? Did Jesus ever make mention of such? Was the "Abomination of Desolation" prophesied for this 'restored' temple during the "Great Tribulation" or was Jesus speaking of the temple that was before him saying of it that "one stone shall not be upon another?"

And how could they rebuild such a temple in such short time? Will they be content with a no frills, prop-up "Costco Warehouse" style building that could go up in a couple of weeks?

As a Christian who acknowledges Christ's "Once for all" sacrifice and the rent veil, I see absolutely no significance or requirement for such a temple and the thought of resuming the temple sacrifices sounds rather blasphemous don't you think?

No doubt the Jews desire to build a temple and we can fully understand why. They believe (according to my understanding) that Messiah will either build the temple or that the temple needs to be built before Messiah comes.

What will the Jews think of such a temple when they actually "Look upon him whom they have pierced" and God replaces their "Heart of stone with a heart of flesh?"
 
Aren't all the prophecies about the rebuilt Temple from before or during the exile?

What did the Israelites do when the exile ended?

They rebuilt the Temple.
 
Ransom said:
Aren't all the prophecies about the rebuilt Temple from before or during the exile?

What did the Israelites do when the exile ended?

They rebuilt the Temple.
Click to expand...
I was thinking there was a "Third Temple" built after the Maccabean Revolt but it was more a renovation and "Building Expansion" by Herod of which was recently completed during Jesus's day when he declared that "One stone shall not be left upon another" in Mt 24.

I know that the A-Millennialists, Post-Toasties, and Preterists say that the "Abomination of Desolation" happened in 70 AD and I am sympatheic to this view but still take a futurist view of Revelation. and I speak rather "Diplomatically" about the specifics of eschatology whenever I am teaching our Sunday School class.
 
Baptist Renegade said:
I was thinking there was a "Third Temple" built after the Maccabean Revolt but it was more a renovation and "Building Expansion" by Herod of which was recently completed during Jesus's day when he declared that "One stone shall not be left upon another" in Mt 24.
Click to expand...

Recently in the sense that buildings of that size often took many years to build (cf. some medieval cathedrals that literally were under construction for centuries). Herod the Great had the second Temple enhanced around 18 BC, which was well before Jesus's day.

I know that the A-Millennialists, Post-Toasties, and Preterists say that the "Abomination of Desolation" happened in 70 AD and I am sympatheic to this view but still take a futurist view of Revelation. and I speak rather "Diplomatically" about the specifics of eschatology whenever I am teaching our Sunday School class.
Click to expand...

The "Abomination of Desolation" was the desecration of the Temple by Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who in 167 BC erected an altar to Zeus in it and then sacrificed a swine on it. That and his aggressive Hellenization efforts led to the Maccabean revolt of a few years later, in which they drove the Seleucids out of Jerusalem, recaptured the Temple Mount and subsequently purified and rededicated the Temple grounds. This is the historic origin of Hannukah.

When Jesus alluded to the "Abomination of Desolation" in Matt. 24, he was talking about the future, but alluding to the past event that it would resemble (hence Matthew's "let the reader understand"). Like Antiochus, Titus desecrated the temple, and a few years later, a Roman temple to Jupiter was built in its place, just as Antiochus had rededicated it to Zeus. When Titus sacked Jerusalem, the Christians in the city fled across the Jordan River to the city of Pella, believing that they were seeing Jesus's words fulfilled.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top