Trump now STRONGLY DEFENDS Bill Clinton

I read it, but I often wait for your take when you post things that interests you. So what do you think?
 
ALAYMAN said:
I read it, but I often wait for your take when you post things that interests you. So what do you think?
Click to expand...
It’s a very strong 180 from a man who has been consistently attacking Bill Clinton and questioning his involvement with Epstein. It’s not a good look. My opinion is Trump is much more involved in this Epstein debacle than he was leading us to believe. In fact, I read another article today that stated he’s confirmed as being a passenger on Epstein’s private plane at least eight times. However, that doesn’t mean Trump was involved in any nefarious activities involving minors, but I have a feeling that he might be involved in other areas. We already know of his involvement with women with ties to the porn industry.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
It’s a very strong 180 from a man who has been consistently attacking Bill Clinton and questioning his involvement with Epstein. It’s not a good look. My opinion is Trump is much more involved in this Epstein debacle than he was leading us to believe. In fact, I read another article today that stated he’s confirmed as being a passenger on Epstein’s private plane at least eight times. However, that doesn’t mean Trump was involved in any nefarious activities involving minors, but I have a feeling that he might be involved in other areas. We already know of his involvement with women with ties to the porn industry.
Click to expand...
OK, that was a little different than what I thought you were implying. If there’s any fire where the smoke is, it’ll eventually come out. Like many other conspiracy theories, though, I think it’ll just be a bunch of people speculating and talking based upon their own biased world views, and perspective.

My take on the debacle so far, is just what has been said by republican politicians recently. If the Democrats had anything on Trump they would’ve already brought it out. And why didn’t the Democrats bring all this out in four years when they had the files?
 
ALAYMAN said:
And why didn’t the Democrats bring all this out in four years when they had the files?
Click to expand...
You must know something I don’t. Weren’t the files just released? BTW, they’ve been released but still heavily redacted. You do realize it’s not exclusively Democrats implicated in this mess, right?
 
We can be sure that anything Trump is doing right now is in the interests of Israel™, and mitigating their crimes. Under the counsel of White, Huckabee, and Cruz, he thinks that by "blessing" Israel™ he is securing blessing for the U.S.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
You must know something I don’t. Weren’t the files just released? BTW, they’ve been released but still heavily redacted. You do realize it’s not exclusively Democrats implicated in this mess, right?
Click to expand...
I spoke unclearly, and simply meant that the Dems recent surge of interest is political expediency, not principled pursuit of justice. They could have shown such energy that they’re showing now during the Biden administration and lobbying for their release. Did they? Of course not. It leaves me less than interested in their current feigning moral zeal. Here’s a decent timeline (from a left leaning source) of political efforts to open the files over the last 7-8 years.

What did I say that made you think that I thought Democrats were the only ones involved in the Epstein fiasco?
 
Last edited:
Ekklesian said:
We can be sure that anything Trump is doing right now is in the interests of Israel™, and mitigating their crimes. Under the counsel of White, Huckabee, and Cruz, he thinks that by "blessing" Israel™ he is securing blessing for the U.S.
Click to expand...
Is there anything you might post that won’t magnify the caricature you’ve become, lol?
 
Ekklesian said:
We can be sure that anything Trump is doing right now is in the interests of Israel™, and mitigating their crimes. Under the counsel of White, Huckabee, and Cruz, he thinks that by "blessing" Israel™ he is securing blessing for the U.S.
Click to expand...

Jooos!*

* From now on, every time I notice a gratuitous mention of Jews or Israel, I'm going to add one more "o" to "Joos." Let's see how long Ekklesian can make it.
 
ALAYMAN said:
I spoke unclearly, and simply meant that the Dems recent surge of interest is political expediency, not principled pursuit of justice. They could have shown such energy that they’re showing now during the Biden administration and lobbying for their release. Did they? Of course not. It leaves me less than interested in their current feigning moral zeal. Here’s a decent timeline (from a left leaning source) of political efforts to open the files over the last 7-8 years.

What did I say that made you think that I thought Democrats were the only ones involved in the Epstein fiasco?
Click to expand...
It’s just the routine quip of, “If the Democrats had anything on Trump they would’ve already brought it out,” that I think is silly and overplayed. This Epstein debacle has tentacles. As I’ve said before, when we’re dealing with a matter than impacts world leaders and billionaire businessmen, it’s very plausible that Trump avoids it just like Biden because the shockwaves will reach too far. But for the record, between the two of them, I’ve never seen Biden’s name attached to Epstein, meanwhile it appears that Trump was much closer to Epstein than he had led citizens to believe.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
It’s just the routine quip of, “If the Democrats had anything on Trump they would’ve already brought it out,” that I think is silly and overplayed. This Epstein debacle has tentacles. As I’ve said before, when we’re dealing with a matter than impacts world leaders and billionaire businessmen, it’s very plausible that Trump avoids it just like Biden because the shockwaves will reach too far. But for the record, between the two of them, I’ve never seen Biden’s name attached to Epstein, meanwhile it appears that Trump was much closer to Epstein than he had led citizens to believe.
Click to expand...
Some of the trash in those files are already declared by the DOJ as fake. The Guardian, as a source, is akin to yellow journalism. I’m sure that powerful people had their slimy trails exposed by some of the files, on both sides of the political aisle. None of that negates the validity of the shallow reason the Dems are pushing front page coverage of it slanted towards accusing Trump of wrongdoing without any evidence.
 
ALAYMAN said:
None of that negates the validity of the shallow reason the Dems are pushing front page coverage of it slanted towards accusing Trump of wrongdoing without any evidence.
Click to expand...
Perhaps he should have been more selective about the people he associated with. Running around with women like Stormy Daniels doesn’t normally lead to good outcomes.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
Perhaps he should have been more selective about the people he associated with. Running around with women like Stormy Daniels doesn’t normally lead to good outcomes.
Click to expand...
Just think about if JFK were alive today and all of the fun that the paparazzi could have with Judith Exner. Yeah, presidents and their weakness for shady women, not all as pure as the driven snow like Bill Clinton, lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top