- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 12,863
- Reaction score
- 3,335
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Joooooooooooooooooooos!
Trump: “I can destroy the country!”
- Thread starter DrHuk&Duck
- Start date
Joooooooooooooooooooos!
Ahhh…and you were doing so well for just a few minutes, but then you just couldn’t help yourself and had to drag the Jews into a topic that had absolutely nothing to do with them.
Trump quote:
They're just FOOLS and "LAPDOGS" for the RINOS (Republicans in name only) and Radical Left Democrats and, not that this should have anything to do with it, very unpatriotic, and disloyal to the Constitution," he wrote on Truth Social.
"It is my opinion that the Court has been swayed by Foreign Interests, and a Political Movement that is far smaller than people would think — But obnoxious, ignorant, and loud!"
Two of the justices who voted against the president - Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett - were appointed by him.
For those of you who prefer, you can probably find the same quotes on Trump’s own Truth Social account, or maybe re-quoted on FOX.
They're just FOOLS and "LAPDOGS" for the RINOS (Republicans in name only) and Radical Left Democrats and, not that this should have anything to do with it, very unpatriotic, and disloyal to the Constitution," he wrote on Truth Social.
"It is my opinion that the Court has been swayed by Foreign Interests, and a Political Movement that is far smaller than people would think — But obnoxious, ignorant, and loud!"
Two of the justices who voted against the president - Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett - were appointed by him.
For those of you who prefer, you can probably find the same quotes on Trump’s own Truth Social account, or maybe re-quoted on FOX.
The truth is, you didn’t even know who (or what) you were posting. You deleted the post that you thought was from @subllibrm. It’s okay, you get confused sometimes.
LOL. Most Zionists aren't Jews. But it has everything to do with MAGA, which was brought into the discussion by someone else.
Last edited:
Neither do you, it seems, because it's not that the the SCOTUS ruling didn't "go his way," it was because the ruling ignored the law.
Is Thomas 'ranting' here?
Thomas rips Supreme Court tariffs ruling, says majority 'errs' on Constitution
Justice Clarence Thomas cited President Richard Nixon's 1971 import surcharge precedent in his dissent, arguing Congress authorized tariff authority under emergency powers law.
www.foxnews.com
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas ripped the court's decision blocking President Donald Trump’s use of an emergency law to impose sweeping tariffs on trading partners, calling it a fundamental misread of both the governing statute and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
"As (Kavanaugh) explains, the Court’s decision … cannot be justified as a matter of statutory interpretation. Congress authorized the President to ‘regulate ... importation,’" Thomas wrote in his dissent. "Throughout American history, the authority to ‘regulate importation’ has been understood to include the authority to impose duties on imports."
Focus here. We’re talking about the reaction of Trump, not anyone else (that includes Jews and Zionists).
I'm not the one that brought MAGA into the discussion, but even if I had, it would have been perfectly legit.
You're just pitching a fit because I shined a light on the spin you were promoting. Besides, my last post WAS on topic. Maybe it's your focus that needs a bit of tweaking.
I’ve only mentioned Trump and SCOTUS. I think you’re suffering from some early onset confusion as well.
Well, not everyone in this thread is talking to you, are they? Bus was talking to me when he said MAGA still supported Trump. And I answered only the Zionists. And that's largely the truth (it's certainly true on this forum), which will be painfully manifest when Trump starts bombing Iran for Bibi again.I’ve only mentioned Trump and SCOTUS. I think you’re suffering from some early onset confusion as well.
President Trump isn't going to have to do much more to destroy a nation on its last breath. I wonder why he'd say such a thing unless he had already contemplated doing so in his mind?
Well, you said I was “pitching a fit,” so I don’t know what you’re saying anymore than you do.
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reaction score
- 2,071
- Points
- 113
The truth is, you didn’t even know who (or what) you were posting. You deleted the post that you thought was from @subllibrm. It’s okay, you get confused sometimes.
I may get confused….I may always be confused…but I’m not the one(s) asking for a response from ‘maga’ to the link you posted. What response did you want, expect or need? I’ll be happy to give you such.
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reaction score
- 2,071
- Points
- 113
Yet another poster interacting with you who is ‘confused’.
When I grow up I hope I’m half as smart as you believe you are…
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reaction score
- 2,071
- Points
- 113
For Sub and the Duck:
Trump is arrogant, prideful, narcissistic and spiteful.
I’m willing to post this every couple of weeks if you think it will help you.
Trump is arrogant, prideful, narcissistic and spiteful.
I’m willing to post this every couple of weeks if you think it will help you.
My apologies. I forgot the unwritten rule that only pro-Trump propaganda pieces can be posted on the forum. I’ll try to do better.
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reaction score
- 2,071
- Points
- 113
My apologies. I forgot the unwritten rule that only pro-Trump propaganda pieces can be posted on the forum. I’ll try to do better.
As to my question: what response did you desire?
An honest one like you gave in another post. The ability, unlike some on the forum who constantly deflect and defend, to call out Trump when warranted. An attempt at bipartisanship, rather than being a one-sided mouthpiece for anything Trump. You passed. Congratulations
