I needed a diversion so I came here for an hour.

So you agree they are hiding something?

Generally, when someone loads his assertions with a lot of plural or indefinite pronouns or other weasel words (in this case, "they" and "something"), it means he's hedging on making a concrete claim.

So your vague aspersions can be vaguely handwaved away.

I'm sure you impress stupid people just the same way stupid people seem to impress you. I'm not one of them, though.
 
Generally, when someone loads his assertions with a lot of plural or indefinite pronouns or other weasel words (in this case, "they" and "something"), it means he's hedging on making a concrete claim.

So your vague aspersions can be vaguely handwaved away.

I'm sure you impress stupid people just the same way stupid people seem to impress you. I'm not one of them, though.
Do you believe that the Us Government is presently hiding the names of pedophiles?
 
Do you believe that the Us Government is presently hiding the names of pedophiles?

Who in the US government? It has 23 million employees. Which ones are supposedly hiding the names of pedophiles? Is the US government (or subset thereof) hiding the names of pedophiles as a matter of policy, or have some individuals or organizations gone rogue? Who are you accusing of being pedophiles? How do you come across this information? Why are they being protected when Jeffrey Epstein wasn't?

"The government is doing it" is no less vague.
 
Who in the US government? It has 23 million employees. Which ones are supposedly hiding the names of pedophiles? Is the US government (or subset thereof) hiding the names of pedophiles as a matter of policy, or have some individuals or organizations gone rogue? Who are you accusing of being pedophiles? How do you come across this information? Why are they being protected when Jeffrey Epstein wasn't?

"The government is doing it" is no less vague.
Wow!
 

People asking questions impress you? You would prefer that your unsupported assertions were just agreed with?

You still aren't naming names, can't tell me where you got this information, can't support it with facts or verify its reliability. You just expect us to take your word for it.

You are a retard.
 
People asking questions impress you? You would prefer that your unsupported assertions were just agreed with?

You still aren't naming names, can't tell me where you got this information, can't support it with facts or verify its reliability. You just expect us to take your word for it.

You are a retard.
1777988808926.jpeg
 
What is this supposed to prove? That you know how to post someone else's screenshots?

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Well, although he was convicted of having a sex trafficking network which means nothing to you?

He was convicted of this how can this mean he acted alone?
 
Well, although he was convicted of having a sex trafficking network which means nothing to you?

Anyone can create and post a "screenshot" saying anything they want it to. So no, it means nothing to me.

He was convicted of this how can this mean he acted alone?

I was asking you who he was acting with.

And of course since you don't know ( :ROFLMAO: ), you just use the opportunity to advertise your ignorance even more. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Anyone can create and post a "screenshot" saying anything they want it to. So no, it means nothing to me.



I was asking you who he was acting with.

And of course since you don't know ( :ROFLMAO: ), you just use the opportunity to advertise your ignorance even more. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
They refuse to investigate who he was working with.

And, it’s a fact proven in court that he had a sex trafficking network.

Who he was acting with is the coverup.

Dumb 🫏!!
 
They refuse to investigate who he was working with.

"They" :ROFLMAO:

And, it’s a fact proven in court that he had a sex trafficking network.

You're still unable to say who the "sex trafficking network" was. :ROFLMAO:

Who he was acting with is the coverup.

You tell us. You're the one in the ["I don't"] know. :ROFLMAO:


Yeah, Ma and Pa Bruh didn't raise any Nobel laureates, that's for sure. :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top