- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,397
- Reaction score
- 3,598
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
I'm not good with the names of particular argumentation tactics like Ransom. But I do recognize that your thinking process is very similar to the "if we can put a man on the moon why can't we....?" logic. If it has a special name I will leave it to someone else to present it to us.
Literally called "appeal to the moon" or argumentum ad lunam. It's a faulty analogy: if we can expend the effort and expense to solve this problem, we should be able to do the same for any problem. The analogy breaks down because sending astronauts to the moon was a relatively simple engineering problem. Doing something like solving homelessness or curing cancer involves many more variables such as human behaviour or biology, which, unlike orbital mechanics, don't always behave in predictable ways.
"The government lied here so we can't trust anything they say, ever" is a hasty generalization. Skepticism is warranted; like the song says, we don't want to get fooled again. As you point out, it's not the same "they"--we're on the fourth administration since the Iraq war began in 2003.[1] I doubt they pass down notes reminding their successors they need to keep lying. Second, "the government" consists of millions of employees and I don't know how many dozens or hundreds of departments. Inconceivable that they would all be lying in unison.
[1] I wanted to count the administrations since the Vietnam war, but Bruh would accuse me of having too much time on my hands.
Last edited: