Big Shack Attack - Back To "The Shack"

illinoisguy

Well-known member
Elect
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
1,572
Reaction score
697
Points
113
Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the religious bookstore:


"THE SHACK may do well for many in engaging the current culture, but not without compromising Christian truth. The book may be psychologically helpful to many who read it, but it is doctrinally harmful to all who are exposed to it. It has a false understanding of God, the Trinity, the person and work of Christ, the nature of man, the institution of the family and marriage, and the nature of the Gospel. For those not trained in orthodox Christian doctrine, this book is very dangerous."


"Fundamentally, The Shack is about redefining God. Young has said that the book is for those with 'a longing that God is as kind and loving as we wish he was'. . . Young therefore admits that the God of The Shack is different from the traditional God of Bible-believing Christianity. He says that the God who 'watches from a distance and judges sin' is 'a Christianized version of Zeus.'. . .

"Young's god is the god of the emerging church. He is cool, loves rock & roll, is non-judgmental, does not exercise wrath toward sin, does not send unbelievers to an eternal fiery hell, does not require repentance and the new birth, puts no obligations on people, doesn't like traditional Bible churches, does not accept the Bible as the infallible Word of God, and does not mind if the early chapters of the Bible are interpreted as 'myth.'"


 
Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the religious bookstore:


"THE SHACK may do well for many in engaging the current culture, but not without compromising Christian truth. The book may be psychologically helpful to many who read it, but it is doctrinally harmful to all who are exposed to it. It has a false understanding of God, the Trinity, the person and work of Christ, the nature of man, the institution of the family and marriage, and the nature of the Gospel. For those not trained in orthodox Christian doctrine, this book is very dangerous."


"Fundamentally, The Shack is about redefining God. Young has said that the book is for those with 'a longing that God is as kind and loving as we wish he was'. . . Young therefore admits that the God of The Shack is different from the traditional God of Bible-believing Christianity. He says that the God who 'watches from a distance and judges sin' is 'a Christianized version of Zeus.'. . .

"Young's god is the god of the emerging church. He is cool, loves rock & roll, is non-judgmental, does not exercise wrath toward sin, does not send unbelievers to an eternal fiery hell, does not require repentance and the new birth, puts no obligations on people, doesn't like traditional Bible churches, does not accept the Bible as the infallible Word of God, and does not mind if the early chapters of the Bible are interpreted as 'myth.'"


I'm sorry, but I take a lot of what David Cloud says with a heaping teaspoon of salt. His pharisaical attitude, trying to live by the letter instead of the spirit of the law is abhorrent, and his dissecting of everyone else's ministry is harmful, and detrimental to the cause of Christ.
 
Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the religious bookstore:


"THE SHACK may do well for many in engaging the current culture, but not without compromising Christian truth. The book may be psychologically helpful to many who read it, but it is doctrinally harmful to all who are exposed to it. It has a false understanding of God, the Trinity, the person and work of Christ, the nature of man, the institution of the family and marriage, and the nature of the Gospel. For those not trained in orthodox Christian doctrine, this book is very dangerous."


"Fundamentally, The Shack is about redefining God. Young has said that the book is for those with 'a longing that God is as kind and loving as we wish he was'. . . Young therefore admits that the God of The Shack is different from the traditional God of Bible-believing Christianity. He says that the God who 'watches from a distance and judges sin' is 'a Christianized version of Zeus.'. . .

"Young's god is the god of the emerging church. He is cool, loves rock & roll, is non-judgmental, does not exercise wrath toward sin, does not send unbelievers to an eternal fiery hell, does not require repentance and the new birth, puts no obligations on people, doesn't like traditional Bible churches, does not accept the Bible as the infallible Word of God, and does not mind if the early chapters of the Bible are interpreted as 'myth.'"


2 Thes 2:3 😉
 
"On the March 12, 2017 episode 5 of Trinity Broadcast Network’s long running Restoring The Shack television series, Shack author Wm. Paul Young stated that it is a 'lie' to believe that God is 'separate' from His creation. . . .

"What Young was attempting to convey to countless TBN viewers was the same thing I had been taught when I was a part of the New Age movement—that there is 'no separation' between God and creation because God is 'in' everyone and everything. But God is not 'in' everyone and everything. . . .

"It is vitally important to understand the concept of “oneness” (i.e., 'the lie of separation' or what some call 'nonduality') because this concept is at the heart of the New Age/New Spirituality, and it greatly diminishes the view of God being greater and set apart from man. It means that there is no good and evil, no right or wrong, and no separation between God and man—thus, all is one, all is God."


 
In the original "Shack," God the Father is a black woman named "Papa."

See Al Mohler's comments on the "Shack" book:

“'Papa' corrects Mack’s theology by asserting, 'I don’t need to punish people for sin. Sin is its own punishment, devouring you from the inside. It’s not my purpose to punish it; it’s my joy to cure it.' Without doubt, God’s joy is in the atonement accomplished by the Son. Nevertheless, the Bible consistently reveals God to be the holy and righteous Judge, who will indeed punish sinners. The idea that sin is merely 'its own punishment' fits the Eastern concept of karma, but not the Christian Gospel. . . .

"The most controversial aspects of The Shack’s message have revolved around questions of universalism, universal redemption, and ultimate reconciliation. Jesus tells Mack: 'Those who love me come from every system that exists. They were Buddhists or Mormons, Baptists or Muslims, Democrats, Republicans and many who don’t vote or are not part of any Sunday morning or religious institutions.' Jesus adds, 'I have no desire to make them Christian.'. . .

"When it comes to The Shack, the really troubling fact is that so many readers are drawn to the theological message of the book, and fail to see how it conflicts with the Bible at so many crucial points. All this reveals a disastrous failure of evangelical discernment. It is hard not to conclude that theological discernment is now a lost art among American evangelicals — and this loss can only lead to theological catastrophe."


 
This whole thread presumes that there are still religious bookstores. Such stores are a dying breed, especially the further north you go.
 
Back
Top