Wrapping the O's

Bruh said:
www.theguardian.com

Kash Patel defends FBI hiring policy on applicants who have engaged in bestiality

Senators question FBI chief on move to cut restrictions on agent applicants who have engaged in bestiality
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

“The FBI director, Kash Patel, defended his agency’s decision to roll back restrictions on agent applicants who have previously engaged in bestiality, arguing the FBI “did not want to punish victims of bestiality” by automatically disqualifying them.”

Yeah, go ahead and keep trusting this guy, Kash Patel.

Go ahead, keep trusting this guy to keep conducting a full investigation on anything.
Click to expand...
Tell me you didn't look into this without telling me you didn't look into this.
 
subllibrm said:
Tell me you didn't look into this without telling me you didn't look into this.
Click to expand...
I looked into it. Go ahead and keep trusting this guy and we can talk about it in……I don’t know 5, 10 years

  • CBS reported that the revised policy also changed automatic disqualifications involving prostitution and employment theft, under specified circumstances.
Also, show me where it’s specifically says that if someone WAS NOT trafficked and did this was no longer qualified.
 
Bruh said:
“The FBI director, Kash Patel, defended his agency’s decision to roll back restrictions on agent applicants who have previously engaged in bestiality, arguing the FBI “did not want to punish victims of bestiality” by automatically disqualifying them.”
Click to expand...

And this has what to do with the Charlie Kirk crime scene?

Covering for one irrelevant assertion by making another doesn't work, at least not when you're surrounded by smarter people. :ROFLMAO:
 
Ransom said:
OK, so then they called in the contractors. So what?
Click to expand...
You are correct, Kash Patels FBI said, nothing more to see here everyone go home. Case closed and you believe him.
 
Ransom said:
And this has what to do with the Charlie Kirk crime scene?

Covering for one irrelevant assertion by making another doesn't work, at least not when you're surrounded by smarter people. :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
If you believe someone like this is able to make good decisions you are a foolish, foolish man.
 
Bruh said:
You are correct, Kash Patels FBI said, nothing more to see here everyone go home. Case closed and you believe him.
Click to expand...

LOL. You're really bad at sarcasm.

It's not a matter of believing Kash Patel or not. If the crime scene was released, it was the university's to do with as they pleased. Law enforcement can't hold private property indefinitely, and the owners are not obliged to keep it untouched indefinitely. Smart people understand this.

And if you acknowledge that, all the other vagueposting about Kash Patel, the FBI, Jooooooos, or whatever, is nothing but empty rhetoric. It certainly lacks the power to persuade smart people that something is amiss.
 
Bruh said:
If you believe someone like this is able to make good decisions you are a foolish, foolish man.
Click to expand...

"Someone like this." Again with the vagueposting.

Who isn't able to make good decisions? The entire law enforcement community that released the crime scene? The administration of a university?

Come on, Duh, stop playing coy. You're not at all sexy.
 
Ransom said:
The crime scene was processed and released. At which point, the school was free to use it again as they wished. They were under no obligation to maintain it as a shrine.
Click to expand...
It wasn't the school. The contractor was given the deadline by the governor and the FBI.

 
Last edited:
Ekklesian said:
It wasn't the school. The contractor was given the deadline by the governor and the FBI.
Click to expand...

LOL. It must be true, someone made a video on YouTube.

Even if that someone is so ignorant, he thinks that the FBI has any say over how a university manages its private property after releasing control of the crime scene.

Or even funnier, being ignorant enough to believe him.

Remember, you can't say "gullible" without saying "bull." :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Bruh said:
I looked into it. Go ahead and keep trusting this guy and we can talk about it in……I don’t know 5, 10 years

  • CBS reported that the revised policy also changed automatic disqualifications involving prostitution and employment theft, under specified circumstances.
Also, show me where it’s specifically says that if someone WAS NOT trafficked and did this was no longer qualified.
Click to expand...
Where did you look?

I read the transcript which reveals a total nothing burger.
 
Bruh said:
I looked into it. Go ahead and keep trusting this guy and we can talk about it in……I don’t know 5, 10 years

  • CBS reported that the revised policy also changed automatic disqualifications involving prostitution and employment theft, under specified circumstances.
Also, show me where it’s specifically says that if someone WAS NOT trafficked and did this was no longer qualified.
Click to expand...
Here is a fairly long review of the exchange between Senator Kennedy and Director Patel.

But yes, "voluntary" beastiality is still an automatic disqualification for FBI service.

If anything I find the Senator's questioning more concerning than the fear that the FBI is going to be overrun with dog diddlers.
 
Ransom said:
LOL. You're really bad at sarcasm.

It's not a matter of believing Kash Patel or not. If the crime scene was released, it was the university's to do with as they pleased. Law enforcement can't hold private property indefinitely, and the owners are not obliged to keep it untouched indefinitely. Smart people understand this.

And if you acknowledge that, all the other vagueposting about Kash Patel, the FBI, Jooooooos, or whatever, is nothing but empty rhetoric. It certainly lacks the power to persuade smart people that something is amiss.
Click to expand...
Hey smart guy, I never said anything about the University.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top