Trump's News Ban from the White House...

The longer he's in office the more the predictions of his overreaching and overreaction seem to be coming true.
 
Politico, MSNBC, CNN and others, no more access inside the White House.
What think ye?

Not strictly unconstitutional, I seem to recall. The 1st Amendment protects the press's freedom to report, not necessarily its access to information. Also, didn't Obama do the same at one point with Fox News? But it's not a good look banning mainstream news gatherers.

Edit: Apparently what Obama did was refuse interview requests from Fox and called on them less during press briefings. Nonetheless, my main point stands. Not a good look.
 
Last edited:
So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.
So you are for innocent men, women and children being murdered in order to have world domination. Seems like you’re anti-pro life Pro-murder at the expense of growth
 
So you are for innocent men, women and children being murdered in order to have world domination.

First, you invent a presupposition in your own imagination--that mistakes don't happen in war and therefore any civilians who die must have been deliberately murdered by the military.

Second, you get mad at people for not agreeing with your imaginary presupposition.

What a fool you are. Our condolences on your self-inflicted wound.
 
First, you invent a presupposition in your own imagination--that mistakes don't happen in war and therefore any civilians who die must have been deliberately murdered by the military.

Second, you get mad at people for not agreeing with your imaginary presupposition.

What a fool you are. Our condolences on your self-inflicted wound.
First, why is the war happening? You seem to not want to answer this.

Second, 😂

What a fool to not understand we live in a fallen world.
 
First, why is the war happening? You seem to not want to answer this.

You never asked this.

What a fool to not understand we live in a fallen world.

Non sequitur. Living in a fallen world doesn't lead to your conclusion.

That which is presented without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. You have consistently failed to show your work. If you aren't obliged to explain how you reach your conclusion that schoolchildren were deliberately targeted, I'm not obliged to believe you.
 
Not strictly unconstitutional, I seem to recall. The 1st Amendment protects the press's freedom to report, not necessarily its access to information. Also, didn't Obama do the same at one point with Fox News? But it's not a good look banning mainstream news gatherers.

Edit: Apparently what Obama did was refuse interview requests from Fox and called on them less during press briefings. Nonetheless, my main point stands. Not a good look.
true... .. the constitution guarantees their right to report the news any way they like... .. but it does not guarantee them a private office or a desk inside the white house... .. even the white house press briefing itself did not exist before woodrow wilson had the first one in 1913.... ....
 
Last edited:
You never asked this.



Non sequitur. Living in a fallen world doesn't lead to your conclusion.

That which is presented without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. You have consistently failed to show your work. If you aren't obliged to explain how you reach your conclusion that schoolchildren were deliberately targeted, I'm not obliged to believe you.
The government said it was an honest mistake. So we will go with that. Because they’ve demonstrated how open and honest they are.

Why do you believe this war is happening?
 
Back
Top