Recent content by Maestroh

This is a bald-faced lie. D.A. Waite argues in favor of the Comma Johanneum. Well, he did.... As did the Syriac Peshiddo, as did the majority of all non-Latin bibles.......and actually, the so-called "fairy tale" has nothing at all to do with its exclusion from any of those. I'd like to...

He doesn't just believe the book else he wouldn't deny the Trinity. Nor would his character necessitate hiding such information. However, your assessment of him as a "simpleton" is, in fact, quite astute. Thank you for your contribution.

I'm going to remind everyone that this individual continually WHINES all over the Internet about what is said on "the censored forum." If he actually has anything resembling a defense of these views, he now has the back and forth he suggests he wants. (he doesn't REALLY want it, and his avoiding...

Sinaiticus authenticity is a multi-orbed study. Let's first go over some of the areas involved in the Sinaiticus authenticity studies. The following tends to be far too much for atomistic scholars who specialize in only one or two realms. But apparently not too much for non-scholars who...

What we have is a "head of the SART team" post. These are the words of Steven Avery Spenser: Sinaiticus authenticity is a multi-orbed study. Let's first go over some of the areas involved in the Sinaiticus authenticity studies. The following tends to be far too much for atomistic scholars who...

Being able to read a manuscript.....being able to know the strokes that change things.......being able to tell how many folks worked on it...... is not relevant to dating a manuscript..... S.............M.................H.................. (Since Avery has decided Simonides couldn't possibly...

By which you mean not familiar with YOUR version of "Sinaiticus studies." All most people need to know can be found in the two Parker books. Elliott substantially covers Simonides. Read those three and you'll know pretty much anything of relevance.

There's NOTHING that has "come forth after the debate" between White and Pinto. There's nothing that wasn't already known by scholars. I find your entire enterprise utterly pathetic because it isn't designed to actually interact with the facts as they are - it's an attempt to capitalize on the...

At CARM, he cannot get away with his little game "look over here because I'm too incompetent to formulate a succinct argument summary."

Here, incidentally, is the previous referenced rebuttal. Avery's post: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/textualcriticism/conversations/messages/8572 Note that he posted this on March 19. I'm not sure why - AFTER being corrected by, you know, someone who actually DOES this work......he...

These are the questions Mr "Iron Sharpeneth" has avoided for 26 months now. Maybe with a different audience we'll get something substantive. I'm still not sure why he bolted over here rather than answering these questions at CARM. 1) Where did David Daniels train in paleography? (post 2) 2)...

Give us the provenance of when Simonides had Claromontanus please.

Since Avery has spent years whining about what he calls "the censored forum" AND since he continues to proclaim his alleged openness to "iron sharpeneth iron," here we go. It's not going to take long for him to want to take the discussion elsewhere or reference a long post elsewhere. I'm not...

Bump to the top for further discussion.