Search results

Nope, that’s exactly the problem, consequently the need to heed the proverb.

He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.

We’ve discussed preaching methods at length on the FFF over the years. Some people like the yelling stuff, others prefer the methodological plodding exegesis of Piper types. Some prefer the camp meeting’ histrionics and love the Tennessee Windsuckers or comedic value of Tony Hutson and bombast...

How many things in that list were Democrat led?

You said “Or he was castigated for not being 100% Trump.” Aint you saying that somebody here is making the claim that Sub needs to be 100% Trump? What does your claim mean that people are saying that sub needs to be 100% Trump? I think this is the crux of the difference in our philosophies...

No judgement of who is serving the wrong master, though, right?😉

I will believe the Carter critique when I see it, lol. 😉

Which side is represented in the meme of this thread?

Are you actually implying that Ransom is incapable of making an argument? 😂 His response is dismissive because he takes the argument unserious, mostly because the one presenting it.

To be fair, I don’t think anybody here is 100% Trump (and certainly nothing near the extent of brainwashed like the 100% Hyles cult-like stuff). Not a single person who has challenged sub’s perspective has not likewise offered criticism of Trump’s personality and personal integrity.

The video is an hour long. How about giving us the salient points from your perspective?

Why does Fuentes only focus his energy on one side of the see-saw?

That’s only half the story, the other half is a tale of people selling their souls to the Republican party. 😉

I would also add that culpability for the kingdom turmoil that followed from David’s reign could/should not be disconnected from the judgments pronounced by God on David for his sin(s) in 2 Sam 12. So in that manner, “the buck stops here” shows the complexity of assigning complete praise and/or...

A very strong defender of religious liberty indeed!

Good points, which is of course why he is a man after God’s own heart, but a very flawed man at that. Relatively speaking, an unrepentant magistrate who forwards commands which promote restraint of evil, restraint of things like sexual mutilation of little boys and girls for instance, might be...

Makes you wonder what kind of leader would steal a man’s wife, let blind ambition make him a bloodthirsty warrior, and self-reliant pride take count of what a great kingdom he had built.

There was a lot more in that article than promoting the raw pragmatism and ethics of Machiavelli. I read some of his stuff way back in college, and came to the conclusion way back then that his ethical framework wasn’t one I would promote. The balance of the article was that integrity wasn’t a...

Why do you assume Stalin wasn’t restrained? Or that God’s purposes in judgment weren’t accomplished?

Only if Trump can be blamed. 😉