Search results

Your improper strawman attempts to twist and distort my words into something that I did not say is wrong.

Your improper insults or name-calling aside, I did not say the words that you improperly try to put in my mouth. The Scriptures do provide the instructions that can be soundly followed concerning how to evaluate soundly manuscript copies of Scripture. A logical and sound deduction or...

Yes, God is not the author of the confusion that would result from erroneous human KJV-only reasoning with its dependence upon fallacies and its use of unjust divers measures. Your bogus claim that someone supposedly has to "prove your statement wrong" involves use of the fallacy of shifting...

There is no need to address your "likely" speculations that have nothing to do with my scripturally-based position. You have not addressed nor refuted my actual Bible-believing position, and you do not deal with the fact that I am not anti-KJV.

You fail to practice what you preach. You fail to demonstrate that I am avoiding the facts. You suppose, speculate, or assume, but you do not prove. It is the supporters of erroneous KJV-only reasoning with its dependence upon fallacies who do not seem to care about all the facts and who are...

Perhaps you are the one who rejects part of Burgon's careful analysis since Burgon did not support nor advocate any Textus Receptus-only or KJV-only theory. KJV-only appeals to Burgon could be considered a red herring. I have not advocated or recommended the Critical Text so perhaps you try...

KJV-only advocate D. A. Waite asserted that “the Textus Receptus is the big circle of 5,210 Greek manuscripts or more” (Fundamentalist Distortions, p. 28). Waite declared that “the Textus Receptus is based on over 5,210 Greek manuscripts” (Fundamentalist Deception, p. 56). Waite argued that...

You may describe the writings of KJV-only authors, but you do not describe accurately all the writings of believers who disagree with unsound, erroneous, human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching. Poor logic even false logic [use of fallacies] is very common in KJV-only writings and in...

Baxter, Daniel J. Isn't the KJV Perfect? Lulu, 2012. 229 pages www.lulu.com The author of this book stated: "I was raised in an independent, fundamental, Bible believing, hell fire and brimstone preaching, bible thumping, King James Version only Baptist Church" (p. 11). On the back...

As a Bible-believer who seeks to present the truth, I have presented detailed, specific, scripturally-based arguments and verifiable facts. Defenders of human KJV-only reasoning may string together a bunch of generalizations and unproven claims and allegations in their effort to rationalize...

Since those who in effect seek to defend inconsistent, non-scriptural, erroneous, human KJV-only reasoning/teaching are unable to defend it soundly and scripturally, do they become so desperate that their only remaining, improper, vain, bogus tactic is an attempt to put words in the mouths of...

Readers may not think that you have demonstrated patience if they consider your improper, negative, incorrect tactics and name-calling Perhaps you reveal that you may be unable to provide sound answers to verifiable facts, sound documented evidence, and scriptural truths that have been...

You are the one who does not think soundly on all of what Bible-believers present. You do not respond to all the points and evidence that are presented. You skipped over and dodged the sound evidence that was provided. You even ignored the statements from KJV-only sources and authors. You...

As usual, you do not define your term of accusation, and you do not show that you would apply it justly. Would you suggest that the KJV translators were "common-core bible-correctors" when they made hundreds of changes, revisions, or corrections to the pre-1611 English Bibles? KJV-only...

You merely speculate and assume, but you fail to prove soundly what you claim. You don't actually compare all the individual readings that underlie the KJV to any actual majority of Greek NT manuscripts. You do not practice what you preach since you do not actually do what you assert. Can...

Actual evidence indicates that all the printed editions of the Textus Receptus in the 1500’s and 1600’s were not every-word completely identical to the Byzantine text. Sam Schnaiter and Ron Tagliapietra asserted: “The Textus Receptus (TR), which came from a handful of manuscripts of the...

KJV-only posters make claims that their generalizations have been proven when they have not. KJV-only author J. A. Moorman acknowledged that “only a relative few of the 5555 MSS now catalogued have been collated” (When the KJV Departs, p. 17). KJV-only author David Cloud maintained that “the...

Your broad-sweeping generalization has not soundly been proven to be true by verifiable specifics--an actual examination and collation of all existing Greek NT manuscripts with specific results giving the actual number of MSS for each individual word of the Greek NT. The KJV is known to follow...

You do not soundly deal with the specific data, verifiable facts, and scriptural truths that I have presented as you make unproven assertions that are simply not true. You do not practice what you preach.

Incorrect. You fail to prove your allegation to be true. You make a false allegation. Peter Ruckman claimed: “The word ‘scripture’ in the Bible is ALWAYS used of copies or translations” (Biblical Scholarship, p. 354). Ruckman contended: “If it is SCRIPTURE, God gave it; if God gave it, the...