Search results

If you say so, Duh, or something. :ROFLMAO:

I think you don't get to tell me who I debate or something. :ROFLMAO:

Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!

Or something. :ROFLMAO:

Broadly speaking, the fallout from the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal, in which hundreds of teenage girls have been sexually assaulted by grooming gangs, primarily of Pakistani immigrants. It's a major scandal in the UK because the response of the police and government has been less...

The Shah was fiercely pro-West. Their "western civilization" wasn't destroyed--he aggressively pursued further Westernization, for example, expanding the rights of women to give them the right to vote and hold office, rewriting family law, and opening up the workplace to them, and repealing the...

Satire, I think, but in the article I linked, he did say basically the same thing about Jack Kevorkian. But he did say that his advocacy for abortion rights is doing what Jesus would want: I am a recovering sexist who is learning how best to stand up for women. Like many of those pushing for...

At least we can say that as a spiritual advisor to a man sitting on death row for beating his wife to death and his execution a week away, Hood's advocacy of polyamory or "queerness" probably isn't going to have much of an impact.

You're just not properly connecting the dots on the crazy wall.

Hey, don't sweat it, Jeff ... just think of it as medical assistance in dying.

Check out the "New Theology School" he founded. Hood's a joke. His god is activism, not Christ.

If it's true that Spencer has found Christ and been truly redeemed, I would rejoice in that. Should Gov. DeSantis conclude that he was rehabilitated, and commute his sentence, I would also rejoice in that. But from what I've heard about Spencer, he was a violent criminal, and that violence...

"The five people charged appeared to subscribe to anti-government conspiracy theories..." Yep, got him dead to rights. :ROFLMAO:

Anyone heard from Ekklesian lately? :ROFLMAO:

Yeah, your opinions are a mile wide and an inch deep, which is why they're only worth laughing at. :ROFLMAO:

Did you get bored of talking about the UFC in a thread you started yourself? It looks like you lasted about one post before changing the subject again.

Yes. We were talking about what happened in 1979, not 1956. You said Iran wasn't attacking U.S. territory. You were proved wrong, so you changed the subject.

Do you have ADHD? That's the only plausible explanation for why you can't stick to the same topic for more than one post.

So you would change the subject again?

The Iran hostages were taken at the US Embassy in Tehran. In March, Iranian missiles targeted the embassies in Riyadh, Kuwait, Dubai, and Baghdad. So yes, fool, on your land.