UFC White House

Ransom said:
The Iran hostages were taken at the US Embassy in Tehran.

In March, Iranian missiles targeted the embassies in Riyadh, Kuwait, Dubai, and Baghdad.

So yes, fool, on your land.
Click to expand...
In 1953 the CIA removed Irans elected Prime Minister. Maybe that had something to do with this?

The Iranians called the embassy “nest of spies” maybe they didn’t want to be spied on?

At this point we became the foreign enemy.

Again, we bring these things onto ourselves.
 
Bruh said:
In 1953 the CIA removed Irans elected Prime Minister. Maybe that had something to do with this?
Click to expand...

Do you have ADHD? That's the only plausible explanation for why you can't stick to the same topic for more than one post.
 
Ransom said:
Do you have ADHD? That's the only plausible explanation for why you can't stick to the same topic for more than one post.
Click to expand...
You said, “The Iran hostages were taken at the US Embassy in Tehran.”
 
Bruh said:
You said, “The Iran hostages were taken at the US Embassy in Tehran.”
Click to expand...

Yes. We were talking about what happened in 1979, not 1956. You said Iran wasn't attacking U.S. territory. You were proved wrong, so you changed the subject.
 
Ransom said:
Yes. We were talking about what happened in 1979, not 1956. You said Iran wasn't attacking U.S. territory. You were proved wrong, so you changed the subject.
Click to expand...
Ok Iran did it but it’s very relevant to why.

To be clear, I wasn’t trying to change the subject because I was “wrong” I said what I said because there is much more to the story. In other words, full context. Context matters Mr. Bible scholar, even in politics.

We were also talking about wether or not America should be involved in the Middle East, basically.
 
Bruh said:
Ok Iran did it but it’s very relevant to why.

To be clear, I wasn’t trying to change the subject because I was “wrong” I said what I said because there is much more to the story. In other words, full context. Context matters Mr. Bible scholar, even in politics.

We were also talking about wether or not America should be involved in the Middle East, basically.
Click to expand...
So your argument, based on "context", is that we shouldn't be involved in the Middle East (Iran specifically) because of past indiscretions (meddling) where we should not be, and that Iran has a right to their last 47 years of murderous and threatening behavior? Would you also then be ok if the Choctaw, Houma, or Natchez people in your state suddenly started fire-bombing the state capital and randomly started scalping the residents of Nawluns for what the Americans did to them in dispossessing their land?
 
Bruh said:
Thank you!
I guess I really need to start posting my sources. Some of these people only watch the 10 o’clock news, ABC News and so forth and of course they will not hear the actual news and tell me I’m making things up. Which is fine it’s whatever 😝
Click to expand...
I never watch the alphabet news.
JSYK
 
ALAYMAN said:
So your argument, based on "context", is that we shouldn't be involved in the Middle East (Iran specifically) because of past indiscretions (meddling) where we should not be, and that Iran has a right to their last 47 years of murderous and threatening behavior? Would you also then be ok if the Choctaw, Houma, or Natchez people in your state suddenly started fire-bombing the state capital and randomly started scalping the residents of Nawluns for what the Americans did to them in dispossessing their land?
Click to expand...
We removed their elected Prime minister in 1953. The hostage situation happened in 1979 26 years after we removed their prime minister. It’s very likely that the Iranians that went through 1979 had relatives that were telling stories about 1953.

To be clear, I disagree with what Iran did in 1979. Therefore, I’d disagree with the Indians doing it to us. However, in a round about way I’d have to admit, ok I get it. That being said, it’s kinda like the black community saying we owe them reparations. No one today was in slavery just like the Indians. The Indians today aren’t hearing stories from relatives that were actually there.

Make sense?
 
President Trump stated Israel's campaign against Hezbollah has gone on for too long and that too many innocent people have been killed.

During his remarks, Trump said, "You don't have to knock down an apartment house every time you're looking for somebody," adding that there are "a lot of people in those apartment houses, and they're not all Hezbollah."

He also suggested that Syria should be allowed to deal with Hezbollah, saying, "I think they do a better job of doing it."

Trump then referenced an Israeli strike in Beirut that reportedly occurred shortly before a ceasefire agreement was set to be signed, saying he "did not like that" and made it clear to Israeli officials that he opposed the attack.

Our President may be coming around???
 
Bruh said:
President Trump stated Israel's campaign against Hezbollah has gone on for too long and that too many innocent people have been killed.
Click to expand...

Did you get bored of talking about the UFC in a thread you started yourself? It looks like you lasted about one post before changing the subject again.
 
Ransom said:
Did you get bored of talking about the UFC in a thread you started yourself? It looks like you lasted about one post before changing the subject again.
Click to expand...
And Iran and the Middle East and if we should be over there and Indians and nuclear weapons and the news and news sources and and and and and.
 
Bruh said:
And Iran and the Middle East and if we should be over there and Indians and nuclear weapons and the news and news sources and and and and and.
Click to expand...

Yeah, your opinions are a mile wide and an inch deep, which is why they're only worth laughing at. :ROFLMAO:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top