Without the Autographs you can't compare the KJV. You have no more evidence for that translation than there is for any other. And again, the 158 years it took to finally perfect the already perfect 1611 blows up the entire argument.
And this conclusion requires that we admit that the 1611 was not.
The claim has been made that the 1611 translators were led (inspired) to create an English translation without any errors. Yet they clearly failed if it needed to be fixed 158 years later.
What led to the revision of the...
I don't know who's making the claim that you assert.
IMO the message that was given to the authors is contained within the various manuscripts. That message has carried forward over millennia and is as powerful as it was when scribe put pen to paper. There's nothing from antiquity that...
I'm starting to fear that you're not misunderstanding me but intentionally misrepresenting me.
Besides the fact that you didn't say anything about the post that you quoted. Not that it needs a response since it's pretty much a truism.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.