Search results

Surely, you don't need to check the wind gauge in order to define what YOU mean when you say either King James Only, King James Onlyist and/or King James Preferred. Come out from behind the shadows and commit to something once in your life.

In your own words please define what you mean when you refer to King James Version Only and King James Version Onlyist.

More fallacious straw man argumentation from our resident Fallacy Meister. I stated that a small consensus could indeed be wrong, but a consensus of born again Spirit filled believers across all denominational lines could NOT be wrong on such immutable doctrines as the identity of the...

More fallacious blather from our resident Fallacy Meister. The autograph is no longer extant. No direct translation or copy of the autograph exists. ALL (absolute consensus) translations and copies are made from non-original copies and translations.  Facts are stubborn things. My antagonists...

I'm not an agnostic. You goofed when you stated, "Any copy or genuine translation of those [the autographs] means that you still hear God's very voice." There are no extant copies or genuine translations of the autographs. All copies and genuine translations are copies of copies or translations...

The problem is that Barry wants to be a rebel and won't submit to the decisions of the Church of God. He and his buddies who would reject the established Canon are rightly treated by the Churches of Christ as heretics or apostates. Jesus didn't command his listeners to search what ever Barry's...

The good doctors in the O.P. stated that given by inspiration of God is  "a direct reference to the sacred writings which Timothy had had in knowledge since his infancy" in direct opposition to your inflated opinion. Timothy did not have the autograph, but every one of the sacred writings he...

Excuse me, but active would be, "God breathes out all Scripture", "The inspiration of God gives all Scripture" or "God inspires all Scripture." Note the present tense. The meaning doesn't change, but the emphasis does. The argument is the present tense copula versus present tense passive. I take...

Gentlemen (and Ladies): As far as I can tell none of the men listed below are/were KJVO and that none of the men believe/believed that anything other than the autograph was inspired, yet, in their writings, they appear to contradict themselves as I will now demonstrate in their commentary on 2...

No one except Barry's cohorts.  As you well know the consensus of born again Spirit filled members of the Church of God recognize the 66 book Canon as "sola scriptura", anyone who rejects that closed Canon (Standard!!!) is rightfully labeled a heretic or apostate by the Church of God.

Consensus of born again Spirit filled Christians doesn?t mean that everyone (absolute unanimity) who professes to be a member of the Church of God agrees or that some particular local church won?t disagree. Determine means to conclude or ascertain after reasoning, observation, etc. It does not...

All that education and you still can't articulate your position. The best you can do is rail, misinform and use straw man arguments. You help yourself. I've had your number for a long time.

Romanism wasn't the defined group, the defined group was born again Spirit filled believing members of the Church of God. When recognizing Scriptural truths only the opinions of born again Spirit filled Christians matter. All other opinion can only help confirm the consensus, they can never...

You stated, "The Canon was not established by a collective voice of the created. It is only RECOGNIZED as God's Word. But, here you go too far, and say that it has authority because of a council." That is your deceptive statement not mine. The Synod of Hipp (393?) and the Synod of Carthage...

Please tell the Reader which of these groups don't believe our 66 book Canon: Baptists, Southern Baptists, Northern Baptists, National Baptists, North American Baptists, International Baptists, American Baptists, Mexican Baptists, General Baptists, Regular Baptists, Missionary Baptists...

The collective voice of the Church of God most certainly did establish the Canon by their recognition, belief, use, etc. of the Canon. Your sectarian, peculiar, private or individually preferred soul liberty does not have more authority than that collective voice Any voice contrary to the...

I don't and won't. I know and have read about many great Christians who call themselves Baptists, however, I'm not a sectarian nor a denominationalist (1Cor 1:12-13, 1Cor 3:3-4). I am a born again Christian who believes the Scriptures. We are to do all things in the name of the Lord Jesus...

That's right Scott, a small group forming a consensus could be wrong, but the consensus of born again Spirit filled members of the Church of God are not wrong about the identity of the Scriptures. Just as I suspected. You will not answer the questions, because when you do you will have to...

It's not a "supposed consensus" as you fallaciously stated above.  It is the collective voice of Baptists, Southern Baptists, Northern Baptists, National Baptists, North American Baptists, International Baptists, American Baptists, Mexican Baptists, General Baptists, Regular Baptists, Missionary...

More fallacious accusations from our resident fallacy-meister.