Abstaining from bloody meat?

[praise_yeshua]

Act 15:20  But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

Porterhouse rare, please.  Maybe a touch closer to medium rare. 

 

[praise_yeshua]

Porterhouse rare, please.  Maybe a touch closer to medium rare.

Porterhouse.... seared and medium rare is my favorite. It'll be rare at the bone. I threaten to chew the bone about every time I get one...

 

[Ransom]

g) The red in red meat is myoglobin,  not hemoglobin. There's no blood in rare meat, and Yeezy just got caught being wrong again.

 

[praise_yeshua]

g) The red in red meat is myoglobin,  not hemoglobin. There's no blood in rare meat, and Yeezy just got caught being wrong again.

I'm aware of what you've described. However, I'm aware that some blood still resides in the meat of most any animal. While myoglobin is prevalent. There isn't any such thing as blood being total absent. In fact, read this government description of measuring added blood in ground meat.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/993176

Also, you're not a Jew nor have you really studied Kosher practices. Meat must be salted and soaked to remove ALL traces of blood from the meat before it can be cooked. In the case of "liver".... it generally must be cut open and broiled extensively before it can be eaten.

You must not understand the culture. An orthodox Jew certainly doesn't care what you think about "food science"

 

[Ransom]

You must not understand the culture. An orthodox Jew certainly doesn't care what you think about "food science"

An orthodox Jew probably realizes that it is physically impossible to remove every last trace of the blood, as well. By your standards all meat would be forbidden because it could not possibly be made kosher. Clearly, reality disagrees.

 

[praise_yeshua]

You must not understand the culture. An orthodox Jew certainly doesn't care what you think about "food science"

An orthodox Jew probably realizes that it is physically impossible to remove every last trace of the blood, as well. By your standards all meat would be forbidden because it could not possibly be made kosher. Clearly, reality disagrees.

I never set that standard. You're lying. Show where I set that standard?

You know you were wrong. Admit it.

 

[Ransom]

Law of Yeezy, corollary 1.  Would de widdle cwybaby wike his pacifier?

 

[praise_yeshua]

Law of Yeezy, corollary 1.  Would de widdle cwybaby wike his pacifier?

You're the one that said there isn't any blood in slaughtered meat. I didn't say that. You did.

 

[Ransom]

You're the one that said there isn't any blood in slaughtered meat. I didn't say that. You did.

Why are you ignoring the part where I said every last trace of blood could not he removed? Are you lying by omission, or are you just suffering  from that 40-minute time limit on your memory again?

There's no crank like a dishonest forgetful crank . . .

 

[praise_yeshua]

You're the one that said there isn't any blood in slaughtered meat. I didn't say that. You did.

Why are you ignoring the part where I said every last trace of blood could not he removed? Are you lying by omission, or are you just suffering  from that 40-minute time limit on your memory again?

There's no crank like a dishonest forgetful crank . . .

You said that much later after I called you on what you said earlier. You changed your "tune". I didn't forget anything.

 

[Ransom]

You said that much later after I called you on what you said earlier.

Obviously you were too stupid to  have inferred that traces of blood would normally remain after the carcass was drained, and it was necessary for me to follow up by stating the obvious.

My apologies for assuming falsely that you are capable of understanding language in its normal sense, or generally being a reasonable person, or perhaps both.

 

[praise_yeshua]

You said that much later after I called you on what you said earlier.

Obviously you were too stupid to  have inferred that traces of blood would normally remain after the carcass was drained, and it was necessary for me to follow up by stating the obvious.

My apologies for assuming falsely that you are capable of understanding language in its normal sense, or generally being a reasonable person, or perhaps both.

You said it wasn't blood. You said that blood is drain when the body when it was slaughtered. That is what you said. I can't help you made a mistake.

 

[Ransom]

You said it wasn't blood.

I said lots of things that, taken as a whole, form a fuller picture of reality. Your inability to follow complex lines of reasoning is your problem, not mine.

 

[praise_yeshua]

You said it wasn't blood.

I said lots of things that, taken as a whole, form a fuller picture of reality. Your inability to follow complex lines of reasoning is your problem, not mine.

Okay "Grumpy".

I understand the argument well. Thanks for "trying" to help. It wasn't necessary.