Where do you start?
How do you progress?
How do you transition from exegesis to preaching/teaching?
How do you progress?
How do you transition from exegesis to preaching/teaching?
FSSL said:Where do you start?
FSSL said:How do you progress?
FSSL said:How do you transition from exegesis to preaching/teaching?
The Rogue Tomato said:Leaping from "there is no perfect translation" to mean "there is no absolute truth".
bibleprotector said:But to be clear, using or not exclusively using the KJB is not the issue here necessarily.
FSSL said:bibleprotector said:But to be clear, using or not exclusively using the KJB is not the issue here necessarily.
It really doesn't take much for you to miss the point.
The title is "antiKJVO," NOT antiKJV.
You are stuck in the mode of negativity. So far, you are unable to post a positive declaration of how you interpret the Bible.
When we discuss the topic, we are quick to declare our approach and find great thinking in well written concise posts.
Why does this happen? We love God's word and like to share how we study it.
bibleprotector said:The Rogue Tomato said:Leaping from "there is no perfect translation" to mean "there is no absolute truth".
So, are you saying that Infidels and Atheists believe there is perfect translation and believe there is absolute truth?
bibleprotector said:Under the banner of Infidelity, we find Modernism . . .
The Rogue Tomato said:There's your leap of logic again (a whopping non-sequitur). It does not follow that if one believes there is no perfect translation, that one also believes there is no absolute truth.
Ransom said:bibleprotector said:Under the banner of Infidelity, we find Modernism . . .
For the love of Jack, do you ever give a straight answer to anything? Sheesh!
bibleprotector said:How is that not a simple, clear cut and straight statement?
Ransom said:immediately before your non-answers.
bibleprotector said:The Rogue Tomato said:There's your leap of logic again (a whopping non-sequitur). It does not follow that if one believes there is no perfect translation, that one also believes there is no absolute truth.
Why object, unless you are an Infidel Atheist?
bibleprotector said:it is impossible to satisfy such questions as answers will always be deemed "evasive", "not answered", "missed the point", etc. etc. etc.