Are Ufos and Alien Abductions Demonic in origin?

Along with aliens and UFOs, I believe the apparitions of Mary, bleeding hosts, etc. are either demonic, imagined/wishful thinking, natural phenomena, or deliberate hoax - some probably fall into each category. One example, about 6-8 months ago, a eucharistic host appeared to start bleeding (I think this was in Indiana). It was sent to a lab and it was determined to be bacteria that was picked up when the host was dropped on the floor.
 
Along with aliens and UFOs, I believe the apparitions of Mary, bleeding hosts, etc. are either demonic, imagined/wishful thinking, natural phenomena, or deliberate hoax - some probably fall into each category. One example, about 6-8 months ago, a eucharistic host appeared to start bleeding (I think this was in Indiana). It was sent to a lab and it was determined to be bacteria that was picked up when the host was dropped on the floor.
Ewwww...🤢
 
One example, about 6-8 months ago, a eucharistic host appeared to start bleeding (I think this was in Indiana). It was sent to a lab and it was determined to be bacteria that was picked up when the host was dropped on the floor.

Bleeding hosts are a common Eucharistic "miracle," and no doubt the actual cause is similar in pretty much all cases (there are other instances where the cause was determined to be bacteria).

It's funny. The transformation of the host into the body and blood of Christ is supposed to be a miracle in itself; why the need for a further miracle on top of a miracle?

Also, the transformation is supposed to take place without changing the accidental properties of the hoat--in other words, it's Christ's flesh but still physically indistinguishable from a wafer. (Which basically makes transubstabtiation unfalsifiable, but I digress.) Why would something that is supposed to be, by all appearances, bread, bleed? What organs is it bleeding from?

Eucharistic miracles are generally pretty low-budget, anyway, not unlike the gold dust and angel feathers that pass for miracles in charismatic churches.
 
Along with aliens and UFOs, I believe the apparitions of Mary, bleeding hosts, etc. are either demonic, imagined/wishful thinking, natural phenomena, or deliberate hoax - some probably fall into each category. One example, about 6-8 months ago, a eucharistic host appeared to start bleeding (I think this was in Indiana). It was sent to a lab and it was determined to be bacteria that was picked up when the host was dropped on the floor.
Believe the so called Fatima of 1917 was satanic
 
Bleeding hosts are a common Eucharistic "miracle," and no doubt the actual cause is similar in pretty much all cases (there are other instances where the cause was determined to be bacteria).

It's funny. The transformation of the host into the body and blood of Christ is supposed to be a miracle in itself; why the need for a further miracle on top of a miracle?

Also, the transformation is supposed to take place without changing the accidental properties of the hoat--in other words, it's Christ's flesh but still physically indistinguishable from a wafer. (Which basically makes transubstabtiation unfalsifiable, but I digress.) Why would something that is supposed to be, by all appearances, bread, bleed? What organs is it bleeding from?

Eucharistic miracles are generally pretty low-budget, anyway, not unlike the gold dust and angel feathers that pass for miracles in charismatic churches.
the big sham in charasmatic churches for awhile was the "power" to lengthen pastors legs
 
Back
Top